Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015024
Original file (20070015024.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070015024 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Chairperson

Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Member

Mr. John G. Heck

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he did not have any misconduct during his military service.

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 August 1975 for a period of 4 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  The highest grade he attained during his military service was private first class (PFC)/E-3.

3.  The applicant's records further show that he was honorably separated for disability and placed on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) on 3 December 1976.  He was subsequently removed from the TDRL and retired for permanent disability on 30 June 1980.  The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued at the time of his separation for temporary disability shows he completed 1 year, 3 months, and 20 days of active military service.

4.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he was awarded the Parachutist Badge.  Item 26 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's record does not show his conduct or efficiency rating during his military service.  However, the applicant's record is void of any derogatory information or a specific disqualification by his unit commander.  As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service.

BOARD VOTE:

__lds___  __lmd___  __jgh___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding the individual the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 14 August 1975 to 3 December 1976; and

	b.  showing award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) in Item 26 of his DD Form 214, dated 3 December 1976. 




							Linda D. Simmons
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015182

    Original file (20070015182.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Records) shows that the applicant had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 7 September 1960 to 12 August 1963 and received conduct and efficiency rating of excellent. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015522

    Original file (20060015522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart; the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 February 1967 to 1 July 1969; the Vietnam Service Medal, with two bronze service stars; the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014523

    Original file (20070014523.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also submitted a copy of Headquarters, United States Army Military Assistance Command-Vietnam, Army Advisory Group, certificate showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for distinguishing himself by meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam, during the period March 1972 to February 1973. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION |GRANT | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides no evidence. There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003111C070206

    Original file (20050003111C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060391C070421

    Original file (2001060391C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart three times and the CIB. The applicant records do not reflect the dates that he served as an 11B in a combat unit in Vietnam, requirements for award of the CIB. b. showing that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period of 29 June 1967 to 10 February 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014695

    Original file (20070014695.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one Overseas Service Bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. The evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period in the Republic of Vietnam for award of one Overseas Service Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008277C070206

    Original file (20050008277C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his OMPF has 5 different orders for his AGCM (4th Award) and he requests that 4 of the awards be removed from his OMPF. These orders awarded the applicant the AGCM (4th Award) for the period 29 January 1997 to 28 January 2000. Orders awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st through 3rd Award) are correct for those time periods in which the applicant served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014031C071108

    Original file (20060014031C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual’s DD Form 214, dated 12...