Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014890
Original file (20070014890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  04 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070014890 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Jeanne Marie Rowan

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Anderholm

Chairperson

Mr. William D. Powers

Member

Mr. Jerome L. Pionk

Member

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the adjustment of his Major (MAJ) date of rank (DOR).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has the documentation to support adjusting his DOR from 12 June 2003 to 20 May 2003, the date the President approved the promotion board. 

3.  As new evidence, the applicant provides copies of DA Form 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions) dated 12 September 2002, DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard) dated 12 September 2002, and two
DA Forms 5500 (Body Fat Content Worksheet) dated 12 June 2003 and one undated.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070007159 on 13 September 2007.

2.  The applicant was commissioned as a Captain (CPT) in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR), Medical Corps, on 30 July 1996.  Effective 15 January 2002, he was assigned to the 3274th U. S. Army Hospital, Fort Bragg, NC in a CPT position.

3.  The applicant submitted new evidence to the Board for its review and consideration.  The new evidence provided is a copy of the applicant's Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) dated 12 September 2002, which shows he passed a record APFT and that his weight met the Standard Table Weight allowed. 

4.  Army Regulation (AR) 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers) states in pertinent part, that an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must meet the requirements before being promoted in the Reserve component.  An officer's promotion is automatically delayed when the officer is documented as overweight as defined in AR 600-9 or has failed the APFT most recently administered, or through his own fault has not taken and passed an APFT within the period required. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support amending its previous decision by correcting his military record to show he was promoted to MAJ with a DOR of 20 May 2003, the date the President approved the 2003 Reserve Component Selection Board.  The applicant has shown that he was in compliance with Army APFT and weight standards on 12 September 2002 which is his last record test prior to the publication of the Board results.  

BOARD VOTE:

__JEA__  __WDP__  __JLP ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR’s decision in Docket Number AR20070007159, dated 13 September 2007.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to Major with a date of rank and effective date of 20 May 2003.




___James E. Anderholm _
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20080304
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007159C071029

    Original file (20070007159C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 9 September 2003, the date he was promoted to MAJ. Therefore, it would be equitable to show the applicant was promoted to MAJ with a DOR and effective date of 12 June 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to Major with a date of rank and effective date of 12 June 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015981

    Original file (20070015981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 4-11c, states in pertinent part that an officers promotion will be delayed when under suspension of favorable personnel actions; when documented as overweight as defined in Army Regulation 600-9 has failed the APFT most recently administered. By regulation, before being promoted a RC officer must be medically qualified; must have undergone a favorable security screening; and must meet weight and APFT standards. The evidence further confirms the applicant did not meet all the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068568C070402

    Original file (2002068568C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his 7 years MTIG as a CPT for promotion to MAJ was 30 November 1997, but that he was promoted to MAJ in the USAR with an effective date and DOR of 2 October 1998. On 17 November 1998, the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) published a promotion memorandum promoting the applicant to the rank of MAJ with an effective date and DOR of 2 October 1998, based on being qualified for promotion as a result of passing the APFT. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065184C070421

    Original file (2001065184C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits copies of: an 11 December 1997 letter informing him of his eligibility for promotion consideration by the upcoming AMEDD Promotion Board; reassignment orders; letters from AR-PERSCOM with six endorsements; two DA Forms 705 dated 6 June 1998 and 2 January 1999 respectively; two DA Forms 5500-R dated 6 June 1998 and 1 January 1999...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027837

    Original file (20100027837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for [U.S. Army Reserve Command] Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 25 August 2003, shows his commander verified he was qualified for promotion. An officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date he/she completes the maximum service. The evidence of record does not show errors in the applicant's rank or DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010900

    Original file (20090010900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010900 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 4-11a of Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must meet the requirements listed below before being promoted in the Reserve components. Paragraph 4-21b(2) of Army Regulation 135-155 states that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have his/her promotion date and effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018522

    Original file (20100018522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior enlisted service, the applicant's military record shows he was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer in the rank/grade of second lieutenant (2LT)/O-1 on 16 July 1986. On 28 September 2007 and 12 May 2010, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components (RC), informed the applicant of the following: a. he was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by the 1993 CPT Department of the Army (DA) RC Selection Board (RCSB); however, a copy of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001796C070205

    Original file (20060001796C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The standard time in grade for promotion to 1LT is 2 years or 18 months. The officer’s records will be screened to determine eligibility for promotion to the next higher grade far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date promotion service is completed. While the advisory opinion noted that an updated security clearance and current physical were required at the time the applicant was due for promotion, it is acknowledged that there is no evidence to show he did not meet those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011159

    Original file (20100011159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DA Form 705 which shows she passed the APFT on 19 November 2006. Therefore, her record should be corrected to show she was promoted to CPT with a DOR and effective date of 19 November 2006 and entitlement to all back pay and allowances due as a result of this adjustment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. promoting her to captain (CPT)/O-3 with a DOR and effective date of 19...