Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015981
Original file (20070015981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070015981 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his major (MAJ) date of rank (DOR) be adjusted from 23 August 2003 to 4 December 2002.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he signed the Oath of Office on 
5 December 1995, and at that time was given credit for 7 years of service in an active status which is reflected in Item D of his Appointment Memorandum dated 22 November 1995.  He also states he was promoted to MAJ with an effective DOR of 25 August 2003, which is 8 months and 20 days after his promotion eligibility date.  He further states that he is now requesting that his DOR be adjusted to 4 December 2002.   

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:
Self-Authored Statement; Service School Academic Evaluation Report (DA Form 1059); United States Army Personnel Command Memorandum, dated 
22 November 1995; and Oath of Office-Military Personnel.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he initially enlisted into the Air Force (AF) and served on active duty in an enlisted status for 3 years, 9 months, and 3 day, from 
10 September 1964 through 12 June 1968, at which time he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of sergeant (E-4), and transferred to the AF Reserve (AFRES).  


2.  On 5 December 1995, the applicant was appointed a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of captain (CPT) in the United States Army Reserves (USAR), Dental Corp and credited with 7 years of constructive service in an active status. Based on the applicant's DOR to CPT his maximum time in grade (MTIG) date for promotion to MAJ is established as 3 December 2002.

3.  The applicants Official Personnel Military File (OPMF) contains a Service School Academic Evaluation Report dated 17 May 1996.  This document shows he completed the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Course on 17 May 1996.  

4.  In 2002, the DA Reserve Components (RC) MAJ AMEDD Selection Board selected the applicant for promotion with a promotion eligibility date (PED) of 
4 December 2002.

5.  The applicant's OMPF contains a notation which states that on 29 May 2002, he was flagged for personnel action based on his Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) and security clearance.

6.  On 7 June 2002, the DA RC MAJ AMEDD Selection Board sent a memorandum with a suspense date of 7 August 2002, through the 81st Regional Support Command (RSC) notifying the applicant and his command that his promotion to MAJ had been suspended due to him not meeting all of the promotion requirements.  

7.  On 12 March 2003, a second memorandum was sent informing the applicant and his command that to date no documentation confirming his promotion eligibility had been received.  

8.  The applicant's OMPF contains a notation which shows that on 20 August 2003 the applicant's unit commander made an inquiry in regards to his promotion.  The unit commander was informed that the applicant's security clearance was the hold-up.  However, the system management system (SMS) further showed that his APFT and height and weight were also issues.  

9.  On 28 April 2004, the promotion authority received the required documents showing that the applicant met all promotion requirements on 25 August 2003.  Based on this date a promotion memorandum was issued promoting the applicant to MAJ with an effective DOR as 25 August 2003.


10.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Human Resources Center (HRC)-St. Louis.  This official stated that the applicant had been appointed a CPT in the USAR with 
7 years of constructive credit effective 5 December 1995, with a promotion eligibility date (PED) for promotion to MAJ as 4 December 2002.  The 2002 Department of Army (DA) Reserve Components MAJ Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Selection Board selected the applicant for promotion with a PED of 
4 December 2002.  On 7 June 2002, after determining the applicant did not meet all requirements for promotion to MAJ a memorandum with a suspense date of 
7 August 2002 was sent to the applicant through the 81st Regional Support Command notifying him and the command that his promotion action was being suspended.  Subsequently, on 12 March 2003, a second memorandum was sent stating that no documentation had been received verifying that the applicant met all promotion requirements for his promotion to MAJ.  

11.  The HRC official also states that on 28 April 2004, more than a year later, documentation was finally received confirming that the applicant had met all promotion requirements on 25 August 2003, and based on this date a promotion memorandum was issued reflecting his DOR as 25 August 2003.  This official further states that the applicant served 7 years, 8 months, and 20 days as a CPT based on the fact that he did not meet all promotion requirements on his PED and therefore recommends that his request to have his DOR adjusted to 
4 December 2002, be denied.  

12.  On 21 February 2008, the applicant was provided a copy of the HRC-St. Louis advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to rebut or respond to its contents.  To date, he has failed to reply.  

13.  Army Regulation 135-101, prescribes the policies, procedures and eligibility criteria for appointment of commissioned officers in the Reserve in the six branches of the Army Medical Department (AMEDD).  This regulation provides that officers will be granted CSC for periods of professional training and experience accrued after receipt of the basic qualifying degree.  

14.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and the commissioned and warrant officers of the USAR.  This regulation specifies that a captain will be considered for promotion to major after serving 7 years time in grade.


15.  Paragraph 4-11a (3-5) Reserve Component (RC) officer promotion regulation specifies, in pertinent part, that promotion authorities will ensure that a favorable security screening is completed before announcing a promotion.  It states in pertinent part that prior to promotion in the RC an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must be medically qualified, have undergone a favorable security screening; and must meet standards of the Army Body Composition Program.  

16.  Paragraph 4-11c, states in pertinent part that an officers promotion will be delayed when under suspension of favorable personnel actions; when documented as overweight as defined in Army Regulation 600-9 has failed the APFT most recently administered. Or, through his or her own fault (as determined by the first commander who is senior to the officer concerned), has not taken and passed an APFT within the period required.

17.  Paragraph 4-13 outlines the security screening requirement.  It states, in pertinent part, that promotion authorities will ensure that a favorable security screening is completed before announcing a promotion.  The security screening process is described as a review of an officer’s military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) or Personnel Electronic Management System (PERMS), which ensures there is no derogatory or unfavorable suitability information contained therein.  It further states that if the results of this screening are favorable, final promotion action may proceed.  A promotion will be withheld only when the security screen reveals unfavorable or derogatory information, and the promotion authority is required to process a National Agency Check (NAC).  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DOR to MAJ should be adjusted to 
4 December 2002 was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.  

2.  By regulation, before being promoted a RC officer must be medically qualified; must have undergone a favorable security screening; and must meet weight and APFT standards.  

3.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2002, DA RC MAJ AMEDD Selection Board.  However, based on not meeting all the requirements for promotion by his PED, his promotion action was suspended and the applicant and his command were notified by memorandum of this action on 7 June 2002 and subsequently 
12 March 2003.  
4.  The evidence further confirms the applicant did not meet all the requirements for promotion to MAJ until 25 August 2003.  Therefore, this is the earliest DOR the applicant is eligible for promotion and there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.   

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x ___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




       _    __x_____   ___
      CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070015981



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070015981



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084855C070212

    Original file (2003084855C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his major (MAJ) date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to 30 June 1994 based on the constructive credit he received upon his appointment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The record also confirms that based on the applicant’s constructive service credit his PED to MAJ would have been established as 30 June 1994; however, he remained in training in the STRAP through 30 June 1996, and at the applicant’s request in an application to this Board, action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010971

    Original file (20070010971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record in this case appears to show the applicant was not promoted on his PED because he did not possess a valid security clearance; however, it provides no information regarding why a security screening of his record was not completed at the time, or why his security clearance packet was not properly processed. The evidence of record also shows that he was promoted to CPT on 29 August 2006, 3 years, 6 months, and 3 days after he was promoted to 1LT on 4 February 2003. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010900

    Original file (20090010900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010900 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 4-11a of Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must meet the requirements listed below before being promoted in the Reserve components. Paragraph 4-21b(2) of Army Regulation 135-155 states that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have his/her promotion date and effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076996C070215

    Original file (2002076996C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also states that her captain (CPT) DOR was 23 May 1995, which established her Promotion Eligibility Date (PED) to MAJ as 22 May 2002 under maximum years in grade (MYIG) provisions of the law. Paragraph (a) states, in pertinent part, that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title, far enough in advance of completing the MYIG so that, if the officer is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065184C070421

    Original file (2001065184C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits copies of: an 11 December 1997 letter informing him of his eligibility for promotion consideration by the upcoming AMEDD Promotion Board; reassignment orders; letters from AR-PERSCOM with six endorsements; two DA Forms 705 dated 6 June 1998 and 2 January 1999 respectively; two DA Forms 5500-R dated 6 June 1998 and 1 January 1999...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027837

    Original file (20100027837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for [U.S. Army Reserve Command] Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 25 August 2003, shows his commander verified he was qualified for promotion. An officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date he/she completes the maximum service. The evidence of record does not show errors in the applicant's rank or DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016783 C070206

    Original file (20050016783 C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction to his date of rank for first lieutenant (1LT) to 12 September 2003. In an advisory opinion, dated 18 January 2006, the Chief, Promotions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command (HRC) – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that they recommended disapproval on the applicant's request to adjust his DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006828C080407

    Original file (20070006828C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Department of the Army (DA), Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, Subject: Promotion of Reserve Component (RC) Officers on a Promotion List Resulting from a Mandatory Promotion Board; Promotion Memorandum, dated 10 August 2000; IRR Transfer Orders, dated 27 June 2002; Promotion Orders, dated 31 May 2005; and ARNG Separation Orders, dated 20 February 2002. Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013460

    Original file (20070013460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAHRC-STL memorandum, dated 13 April 2005, shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to 1LT by an Administrative Promotion Board that convened on 31 March 2005. USAHRC-STL Orders B-05-501580, dated 9 May 2005, show that the applicant was promoted to 1LT effective 18 April 2005, with a date of rank of 18 April 2005. Based on her date of rank of 18 April 2005 and completion of 5 years time in the lower grade, the applicant's promotion eligibility date (PED) for CPT is 17 April 2010.