RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 25 January 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012986
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. David K. Haasenritter
Chairperson
Mr. James R. Hastie
Member
Mr. Edward E. Montgomery
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his Reentry Eligibility Code (RE Code) from RE-4 to RE-3.
2. The applicant states that his commander informed him prior to separation that he would be able to get back in the Army after his discharge
3. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 3 May 2007, in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 October 2006 for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat at Fort Knox, Kentucky.
2. On 5 January 2007, while attending advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia, the applicant participated in a unit urinalysis and his urine specimen tested positive for marijuana.
3. On 28 February 2007, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for using marijuana between 5 December 2006 and 5 January 2007. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $650.00 pay per month for two months, 45 days of restriction, and 45 days of extra duty.
4. On 2 April 2007, the applicants immediate commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him from the Army for commission of a serious offense, use of marijuana. The immediate commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
5. On 2 April 2007, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the separation memorandum and on the same day he declined the opportunity to consult with legal counsel. However, he was advised by his immediate commander of the basis for the contemplated separation for misconduct, the type of discharge and its effect on further enlistment or reenlistment, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures/rights that were available to him.
6. On 2 April 2007, the immediate commander remarked that the applicants performance had been substandard and that the applicant had shown an inability to be trusted, learn, or live the Army values. Though not disrespectful, he clearly did not have the potential to become a productive soldier in the military and that all efforts to rehabilitate him were exhausted.
7. On 3 April 2007, the applicants intermediate commander recommended approval of the applicants separation and commented that the applicant had brought discredit to his unit and the Army through his misconduct. He further recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
8. On 20 April 2007, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of commission of serious offense (misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs), and directed the applicant be furnished an Entry Level Separation (Uncharacterized). Accordingly, he was discharged on 3 May 2007. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged with a Character of Service of Uncharacterized, a Narrative Reason for Separation of Misconduct-Drug Abuse, and a Reentry Code of 4. This form further confirms that he completed 6 months and 29 days of creditable active military service.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 established policy and prescribed procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. Action would be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation was impracticable or was unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldiers overall record. Only a general court-martial convening authority may approve an honorable discharge or delegate approval authority for an honorable discharge under this provision of regulation. If characterization of service under other than honorable conditions is not warranted for a Soldier in entry-level status, service will be described as uncharacterized.
10. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and
procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes:
a. RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.
b. RE-4 applies to individuals separated from last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Evidence of record confirms that the applicants reason for separation and RE code were assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 due to misconduct, commission of a serious offense. The underlying reason for his discharge was his misconduct abuse of illegal drugs. Absent the misconduct, there was no fundamental reason to process the applicant for discharge. The only valid narrative reason for discharge permitted under that paragraph is "Misconduct. Therefore, he received the appropriate RE code associated with his discharge
2. All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.
3. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. The RE-4 assigned to the applicant at the time of his discharge is correct.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__dkh___ __jkh___ __eem___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
David K. Haasenritter
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX
RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008393C070205
On 14 February 2006, the applicant was informed by his commander that his blood test results had tested positive for amphetamines and that he was being recommended for separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 22 March 2006 and directed that the applicant be issued an uncharacterized entry-level separation. The applicant was discharged because he tested...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017222C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge to honorable. On 7 November 1978, the applicant's unit commander recommended his elimination from the Army, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, due to misconduct (civil conviction). On 2 March 1979, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant's discharge, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, for civil court conviction, and directed his reduction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010599
The applicant provides the following in support of this application: a. a legal brief from his counsel; b. his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty); c. his enlistment contract which shows that he enlisted in the North Carolina Army National Guard on 31 July 2003; d. a portion of his DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) which shows, in pertinent part, that he tested positive for marijuana, and was informed by letter of the reason for his disqualification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000586
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000586 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he served for more than 3 years in the Regular Army and was discharged for wrongful use of a controlled substance. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013022
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. It states, in pertinent part, that separation under this chapter applies to Soldiers who are in an entry level status and, before the date of the initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty and have demonstrated that they cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004381
The applicant requests that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "4" to "3." Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities, reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that his assigned RE code is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012042
On 10 August 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense and directed her service be uncharacterized. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009924
The applicant's record does not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. On 20 June 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009834
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016114C071113
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 20 September 1991, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, chapter14, for a pattern of misconduct, with an UOTHC discharge. After carefully evaluating the evidence of record in this case, the applicant’s discharge processing was conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and that the character of his service...