Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012901
Original file (20070012901.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  25 January 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070012901 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. David K. Haasenritter

Chairperson

Mr. James R. Hastie

Member

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of Item 7a (Place of Entry Into Active Duty) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 May 2007, to show "Fort Bragg, North Carolina", instead of "San Antonio, Texas."

2.  The applicant states that he was discharged from his enlisted status on 12 February 1992 and was ordered to active duty and executed his oath of office as a Warrant Officer at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on 13 February 1992.

3.  The applicant provides the following documentary evidence in support of his application: 

	a.  DD Form 214, dated 31 May 2007.

	b.  DD Form 214, dated 12 February 1992.

	c.  Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Orders 24-86-A-009, dated 24 January 1992 (Active Duty Orders).

	d.  Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Orders 21-86, dated 21 January 1992 (Discharge Orders)

	e.  DA Form 71 (Oath of Office-Military Personnel), dated 13 February 1992.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that, with prior service in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 31 May 1979 in St. Louis, Missouri.  He later enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 October 1980 in St. Louis, Missouri.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76P (Materiel Control and Accountability Specialist).  He was honorably discharged and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 16 October 1983. 

2.  The applicant’s records further show that after a short break in service, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 20 November 1984 in San Antonio, Texas.  He completed the Special Forces Qualification Course and was awarded MOS 18E (Special Forces Communications Sergeant).  He subsequently executed a series of extensions and/or reenlistments.  The highest enlisted grade he attained was sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7. 

3.  On 2 July 1990, the applicant submitted an application for appointment as a warrant officer of the U.S. Army Reserve.  He was accepted as a Special Forces Warrant Officer and completed the Warrant Officer Technical Certification Course in February 1992.

4.  On 21 January 1992, Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, published Orders 21-86 reassigning the applicant to the U.S. Army Transition Point, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, with a reporting date of 11 February 1992.  His date of discharge was 12 February 1992.  

5.  On 24 January 1992, Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, published Orders 24-86-A-009, ordering the applicant to active duty in the grade of Warrant Officer One with assignment to the 1st Special Forces Group, Fort Lewis, Washington.  The Orders further stated that the applicant would be discharged from his enlisted status on the day preceding the effective date of his appointment and that to preclude a break in service, the oath of office would be administered the day after discharge.  The effective date of appointment was 13 February 1992. 

6.  On 12 February 1992, the applicant was discharged in accordance with chapter 16 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of accepting an appointment as a warrant officer.  The DD Form 214 he was issued on 12 February 1992 shows the entry “San Antonio, TX” in Item 7e and the entry “8802 Tradewinds #309 San Antonio TX 78239” in Item 7b (Home of Record at Time of Entry).

7.  On 13 February 1992, the applicant executed an oath of office at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. 

8.  The applicant subsequently served in a variety of assignments within the Special Forces community in the United States and overseas.  He was promoted to the grade of chief warrant officer four (CW4) on 1 November 2004 and retired on 31 May 2007.  

9.  The DD Form 214 he was issued on 31 May 2007 shows he completed 26 years, 1 month, and 18 days of active military service.  Item 7e of this form reflects the entry “San Antonio, Texas” and Item 7b reflects the entry “8802 Tradewinds San Antonio Texas 78239.”

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  This regulation specified that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  The DD Form 214 is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  

11.  Item 7 of the DD Form 214 shows the place of entry onto active duty and home of record at time of entry.  A Soldier’s initial enlistment contract or appointment document is the source for this date, or any approved change by the Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC).  Item 7a shows the city and state where the soldier entered active duty.  Item 7b shows the street, city, state and ZIP code listed as the Soldier’s home of record. “Home of Record” is the place recorded as the home of record of the soldier when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, or ordered to a tour of active duty.  This cannot be changed unless there is a break in service of at least 1 full day (Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume 1, App A, Part I).  Home of record is not always the same as the legal domicile as defined for income tax purposes.  Legal domicile may change during a soldier’s career.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant “entered active duty” in San Antonio, Texas, when he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 1984. Therefore, San Antonio, Texas, was established as his home of record and the entry is shown correctly in Item 7e of his DD Form 214, dated 31 May 2007. 

2.  Evidence of record further shows that the applicant did not have a break in service when he was discharged as an enlisted member and was appointed as a warrant officer.  The fact that he executed his oath of office on 13 February 1992 at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, did not change his home of record.  Therefore, the entry in Item 7b is also shown correctly.

3.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that warrants correction of his records.  Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__dkh___  __jrh___  __eem___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




						David K. Haasenritter
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016996

    Original file (20120016996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a change of his home of record (HOR) from "North Carolina" to "Philippines." His record includes: * a DD Form 214 covering his RA service showing his HOR as an address in Daly City, CA * a DA Form 597-3 showing his HOR as an address in Hayward, CA * active duty orders showing his HOR as an address in San Mateo, CA * retirement orders showing his HOR as an address in "Hatward, CA" (presumably an error that should read "Hayward, CA") * an amendment to his retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002801C070206

    Original file (20050002801C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the place of entry into active duty and home of record that are listed in his military service records are in error and should be corrected. The applicant contends, in effect, that the place of his entry into active duty and home of record should be corrected because they were incorrectly recorded on his enlistment documents and subsequently on his discharge document. As a result, the enlistment document, and the information that was originally entered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008429

    Original file (20140008429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140008429 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his officially recorded home of record (HOR) be changed. Therefore, his HOR should have been changed from Georgetown, SC, the location where he initially enlisted, to Converse, TX, his legal residence/HOR on the date of commissioning; and d. he must sign the final DD Form 214 prior to 31 August 2014, his date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018363

    Original file (20110018363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 1992 to show item 7a (Place of Entry Into Active Duty (PEAD)) and item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) as San Antonio, TX vice Showlow, AZ. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010139

    Original file (20140010139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 March 2000 to show her home of record (HOR) as San Antonio, Texas. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * driver's license information * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office) * Texas dental license * tax documents * real estate purchase agreement/settlement statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Correction of the HOR must be based on evidence that a bona fide error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605505C070209

    Original file (9605505C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 1 February 1986 that the place of entry into active duty was San Antonio, Texas, instead of Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Orders issued by Fort Sill, dated 12 March 1974, indicate that the applicant was ordered to active duty from the Texas Army National Guard, in the rank of second lieutenant, as a Reserve officer of the Army effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060401C070421

    Original file (2001060401C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's statement indicates that his home of record (HOR) is San Antonio, Texas; however, he is a German National and he was forced to pay $900.00 for travel to Germany for both his wife and himself after he was discharged. A member traveling to a different location is entitled to allowances for travel performed up to the amount payable for travel from the last permanent duty station to the HOR or PLEAD, whichever is greater. That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002474

    Original file (20140002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her final DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her Place of Entry Into Active Duty (Place EAD) was San Antonio, TX, not Miami, FL. The applicant states that her initial DD Form 214 shows her Place EAD was Miami, FL, which is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. correcting Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Dix, NJ,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010170

    Original file (20070010170.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 3rd Battalion, 321st Field Artillery Regiment, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Permanent Order Number 170-003, dated 6 May 2003, shows that the applicant was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious achievement while supporting the Special Forces Qualification Course during the period 2 May 2003 through 16 May 2003. The applicant submitted several Certificates of Achievement, Recognition, and Appreciation issued to him throughout his military service. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051454C070420

    Original file (2001051454C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also concluded that no reimbursement exists because there was no evidence of “official” travel supported by official orders for the period of time the applicant was attached for duty at Fort Bragg. k. The DOHA, based on Comptroller General decisions and provisions of the JFTR, denied the applicant reimbursement for per diem for the period the applicant was attached and was present at Fort Bragg because it was determined to be disciplinary travel. c. Notwithstanding the determination...