Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010119
Original file (20070010119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	


	BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070010119 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Michael J. Fowler

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Vick

Chairperson

Mr. Thomas H. Ray

Member

Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the reason for separation be changed on her U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) Orders C-09-5543000, dated 
12 September 1995, from completion of 20 or more years reserve duty to read physical disability. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) corrected her release from active duty orders and her DD Form 214.  She has been trying for almost a year to have the above orders corrected.

3.  The applicant provides ARPERCEN Orders C-06-700309, dated 9 June 1995; ARPERCEN Orders C-09-554300, dated 12 September 1995; U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) Orders C-09-554300A01, dated 6 June 2000; AR-PERSCOM Orders C-06-701036, dated 6 June 2000; a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with the ending period 26 June 1995; a U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis (USAHRC-STL) Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 
20 December 2006; a letter addressed to the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 28 December 2006; and a two page e-mail.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was commissioned in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 
29 March 1973.  

3.  On 26 June 1995, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214, with the period ending 26 June 1995, as corrected by the ABCMR in Docket Number AC1999027810, shows the entry "DISABILITY, OTHER."
4.  ARPERCEN Orders C-09-554300, dated 12 September 1995, show that effective 12 September 1995 the applicant was released from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and assigned to the Retired Reserve by reason of completing 20 or more years reserve duty.

5.  The applicant's records contained a memorandum from ARPERCEN, dated 
6 November 1995, Subject: Notification of Medical Disqualification.  The memorandum stated that the applicant did not meet the standards for retention in the USAR and/or entry on active duty by reason of medical disqualification.

6.  AR-PERSCOM Orders C-06-701036, dated 6 June 2000, amended the orders dated 9 June 1995 to show that the applicant was released from active duty on 26 June 1995 by reason of physical disability.

7.  AR-PERSCOM Orders C-09-554300A01, dated 6 June 2000, amended ARPERCEN Orders C-09-554300 to change the effective date of assignment to the Retired Reserve from 12 September 1995 to 28 June 1995.  The reason for assignment was not changed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the memorandum from ARPERCEN, dated 
6 November 1995, indicated that the applicant did not meet the standards for retention in the USAR and/or entry on active duty by reason of medical disqualification.

2.  Furthermore, the applicant's DD Form 214 as corrected by the ABCMR shows she was released from active duty by reason of "DISABILITY, OTHER" and her corrected release from active duty orders show she was released by reason of physical disability.  Since the evidence shows the applicant did not meet retention standards because of medical disqualification, her reason for assignment to the Retired Reserve should also have been amended to read medical disqualification/physical disability.

BOARD VOTE:

__JEV_ _  __THR__  __JCR___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that a corrected copy of AR-PERCEN Orders C-09-554300A01, dated 6 June 2000 pertaining to the individual concerned be prepared to show: 

	a.  As reads:  Reason:  COMPL 20 OR MORE YRS RES DTY; Effective Date:  12 sep 95; and

	b.  How changed:  IATR:  Reason:  Medical Disqualification/Physical Disability; Effective Date:  VOCO 28 June 95 VOCO Confirmed.




	______ James E. Vick __
          		CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070010119
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
22 JANUARY 2007
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
MR. SHATZER
ISSUES         1.
110.0200.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072661C070403

    Original file (2002072661C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also stated that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to a medical disqualification. The applicant had not done so. Army Regulation 140-111 (U. S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program), Table 2-1, states that soldiers must meet Army weight standards and have a current (within five years) qualifying military physical to be reenlisted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007213C070206

    Original file (20050007213C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides two AHRC Forms 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points); her Retirement Points Accounting System Statement; a copy of ARPERCEN, Orders C-03-410376A01 dated 14 September 1995; a copy of ARPERCEN, Orders C-03-410376 dated 15 March 1994; reassignment orders dated 9 January 1992; her notification of eligibility for retired pay at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069736C070402

    Original file (2002069736C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 1989 USAR Standby Advisory Board reviewed his record and selected him for promotion to MAJ. A 1989 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings directed that his discharge be voided, that he be promoted to MAJ, that he be credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement, and that an explanation be placed in his records to show that the resulting gap in Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs) was due to no fault of the officer. On 18 October 1988, ARPERCEN issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072743C070403

    Original file (2002072743C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 1997, the OKARNG issued a NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) honorably discharging the applicant from the OKARNG as a SGT, pay grade E-5, by reason of the individual's request. The investigation further substantiated that: the applicant submitted false information on his application for Army National Guard federal recognition in January 1987 by stating “No” to the question, “Have you ever been arrested or convicted by a civil court of other than minor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010903

    Original file (20060010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge be voided and that she be processed for a physical disability separation with resultant benefits and severance pay. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 13 August 1997, the date of her discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). However, even if a LOD had been performed, it is doubtful that her diagnosed pelvic adhesive disease would have been the proximate result of her performing duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008377C070208

    Original file (20040008377C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. f. Orders D-12-505221, ARPERCEN, dated 12 December 1995, discharging the applicant from the USAR effective 12 December 1995. g. Orders 99-38, Headquarters, US Army intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, dated 20 May 1992, discharging the applicant from the RA on 1 September 1992. h. SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination), Buffalo MEPS, dated 3 September 1997, showing the applicant was disqualified for enlistment due to "elevated intraocular pressure." The Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009301

    Original file (20090009301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that his request for a medical waiver was disapproved and that he had remained in the Retired Reserve, thereby being eligible for retirement benefits. The applicant requested a waiver of his medical disqualification so that he could complete 20 years of qualifying service for a non-regular retirement. The law granting an early retirement based on completion of 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002607

    Original file (20130002607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she was not counseled or afforded the opportunity to transfer into the Retired Reserve in accordance with Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve – Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) and Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prior to being discharged from the USAR on 30 September 1999. Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-4, states that USAR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016026C070206

    Original file (20050016026C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of AHRC Form 249-2 (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 9 June 2005, which shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant had completed 17 qualifying years, at the time the form was produced. Paragraph 2-8 defines qualifying service and states, in pertinent part, that a Reserve Component Soldier must earn a minimum of 50 retirement points each retirement year to have that year credited as qualifying service. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000742

    Original file (20140000742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center memorandum, dated 28 October 1983, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, states he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to the rank of LTC in the MSC effective 12 August 1983. He held the rank of LTC on the date he retired from the USAR and he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC effective 2 November 2001. However, there is no evidence of record and he...