Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009381C080213
Original file (20070009381C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  14 November 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070009381 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mrs. Nancy L. Amos

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Chairperson

Ms. Carmen Duncan

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his service percentage multiplier for his retired pay be based upon 19 years, 4 months, and 14 days of service.

2.  The applicant states that records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) are in error in that they indicate he served 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days.  However, his actual years of service are 19 years, 4 months, and  14 days.  

3.  The applicant provides a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 19 April 2007, with a Retirement Points Accounting System (RPAS) explanation sheet; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23 (Army National Guard Retirement Credits Record); a Reserve Retirement Credit Report; a U. S. Marine Corps Reserve enlistment contract; discharge orders, dated 13 September 1971; an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); a DD Form    214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 June 1969; two DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), for the periods ending 20 June 1974 and 6 April 1977; and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 August 1986.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 August 1966.  He was released from active duty on 30 June 1969 and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He was discharged from the USAR on 19 January 1970 and enlisted in the U. S. Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR).  He was discharged from 

the USMCR on 5 October 1970.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 6 October 1970.  He was discharged from the ARNG on 26 July 1971.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 July 1971 and remained on continuous active duty until his physical disability retirement on 26 August 1986 with a 30 percent disability rating.  He was placed on the retired list on 27 August 1986.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 August 1986 shows he completed 9 years, 4 months, and 20 days of active duty for the period covered by that DD Form 214 and 8 years, 6 months, and 16 days of prior active duty for a total of 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days of active duty.

4.  The applicant provided a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 19 April 2007, that shows he had 19 years, 4 months, and 14 days of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement.  This statement shows that during his service in the USAR he performed no active duty; during his service in the USMCR he performed 16 days of active duty; and during his service in the ARNG he performed 15 days of active duty.  During his time in the USMCR and the ARNG he earned 50 or more retirement points per retirement year, sufficient to qualify as a “good” retirement year.

5.  An updated Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 7 November 2007, shows the applicant had 19 years, 5 months, and 14 days of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement.

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1401 (Computation of retired pay) states in pertinent part that the monthly retired pay of a person retired under section 1201 (Physical disability retirement for Regulars and members on active duty for more than 30 days) is calculated by the retired pay base as computed under section 1406(b).  

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1406(b) (retired pay base for members who first became members before 8 September 1980 and who are entitled to retired pay under section 1201) states the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay of the grade to which the member is entitled under section 1372 or to which he was entitled on the day before retirement, whichever is higher.

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1401 further states that the retired pay base is multiplied by 2 and 1/2 percent of the years of service credited to the member under section 1208 or the percentage of disability on the date when retired.  Section 1208 states a member of a Regular component (retired for disability) 

shall be credited with the service that he is considered to have for the purpose of separation, discharge, or retirement for length of service or the sum of his active service as a member of the armed forces, whichever is greater.

9.  Title 10, section 101(d)(3) defines “active service” to mean service on active duty or full-time National Guard duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant appears to be confusing two concepts – what his qualifying years of service would have been for a Reserve retirement (had he been otherwise eligible for a Reserve retirement, which he was not) and the retired pay base/multiplier for calculating the retired pay of a Regular Army member who retired for disability (which he was/did).  It is noted that two of the years that would have qualified for a Reserve retirement showed that the applicant completed only 31 days of active duty during that same period.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days of active duty.  His retired pay base is multiplied by 2 and 1/2 percent of the years of service credited to him under section 1208 (since it would have been greater than his 30 percent disability rating).  Section 1208 states he would be credited with the service that he is considered to have for the purpose of separation, discharge, or retirement for length of service (he would have had    17 years, 11 months and 6 days of service towards a length of service retirement) or the sum of his active service as a member of the armed forces.  “Active service” is also defined as active duty.  The evidence of record shows he completed a total of 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days of active duty.  

3.  Based on the above, it appears that DFAS properly calculated his retired pay based upon 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days of active service.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lds___  __cd____  __qas___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__Linda D. Simmons____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070009381
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20071114
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Ms. Mitrano
ISSUES         1.
128.00
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02589 2

    Original file (BC 2010 02589 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability retirement be changed to a length of service retirement. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to retired pay for his over 30 years of service with retired pay calculated near 80 percent rather than the 75 percent cap for a disability retirement. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077915C070215

    Original file (2002077915C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that her records be corrected to reflect her correct active service time in order to receive the severance pay due her. In a 25 June 2002 letter to a Member of Congress (MC), the applicant provides details of her efforts to correct her records. She was a member of the Army Reserve until 30 June 2000 when she was medically discharged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014180

    Original file (20100014180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This time accounts for his first period of Regular Army active service and his 42 days of active service while in the Reserve components. A letter, dated 27 July 2010, from DFAS to a Member of Congress states, in pertinent part, the applicant's military records reflect he has 29 years, 3 months, and 11 days for his service base pay; the Department of the Army retired the applicant with 24 years, 4 months, and 26 days of total active service (service percent multiplier); and the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078928C070215

    Original file (2002078928C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, there is no prohibition against calculating ORC service on a "year for year" basis since the 10 May 2001 advisory opinion by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) in Docket Number AR2001056085, dated 27 September 2001, was silent on the applicant's service in the ORC and did not state that " year for year ORC was specifically excluded by statute." Evidence of record shows that the applicant received credit for attendance at only 38 drill periods and 15 days of annual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10286-02

    Original file (10286-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    104—450, see 1996 U.S. Code Cong.and Adm. News, p. 238.House Report No. (b)(1) as so designated, substituted “under this section” for “under this chapter”, and added subsecs. Amendment to this section by section 635(b) of Pub.L.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012152

    Original file (20050012152.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050012152 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. This is true, since he was promoted to Major on 1 July 1955 he should have been moved up one rank upon retirement. This is not true, as per the attached Certificate of Retirement from the Armed Forces he retired on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017349C070206

    Original file (20050017349C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a NGB Form 22, with an effective date of 15 December 2003, which shows, in pertinent part, that at the time of the applicant's discharge she had completed a total of 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days service for retired pay. The evidence of records shows that the applicant completed her last 6 years of qualifying service as a member of the ARNG. The evidence of records also shows that, at the time of her discharge, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002407

    Original file (20150002407.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders Number 210-236 dated 29 July 2010, issued by the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG), showing the applicant was promoted to sergeant major (SGM)/E-9 with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 7 August 2010 * Orders Number 274-026 dated 1 October 2014, issued by the FLARNG, showing the applicant was discharged from the FLARNG and assigned to the Retired Reserve effective 30 January 2015 * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement - Application for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013029

    Original file (20080013029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of an Information Paper, dated 24 March 2008; her Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings; her PEBLO (Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officer) Counseling Checklist/Statement; her Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) proceedings; her discharge orders from the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS), dated 28 April 2008; a memorandum, subject: Physical Disability Separation, [name], PFC, [social security number], dated 28 April 2008; and her discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055894C070420

    Original file (2001055894C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant had completed in excess of 6 months (180 days) of active duty at the time she was separated. The regulation does not require 6 months of continuous active duty; however, presumably the Army Finance and Accounting Service at the time did not determine she had 6 months of active duty because it was not continuous. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was entitled to...