RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 November 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009342
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. Eric N. Anderson
Chairperson
Mr. Donald L. Lewy
Member
Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests payment of an enlistment bonus in conjunction with her enlistment for military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Food Service Specialist).
2. The applicant states that she never received her bonus.
3. The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 1 June 1981; an undated self-authored letter; and a copy of DD Form 1966/6 and 1966/7 (Annexes to Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), in support of her application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 6 years in pay grade E-1 on 23 June 1980. Her DD Form 1966/6 shows the following entry in Item 38 [I am interested in the following military skills; I fully understand that I will not be guaranteed any specific military skills or assignment to a geographical area unless it is included in Section VI of this form and in my DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) and attached annexes or if my recruiter listed it in Item 37 above]:
"Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 1st Battalion,
95th Regiment, 4th Brigade, One Station Unit Training (OSUT)
MOS 94B, Bonus, Split Training."
3. Item 42j (Specific Option/Program Enlisted For) of Section VI (Enlistment Options Accepted) of the DD Form 1966/7 shows the applicant enlisted for:
"Headquarters, 4013th U.S. Army Garrison, 300 Miller Road
Bossier City, Louisiana, 71112, Unit Identification Code
(UIC) W8MFAA; Alternate Training Program in accordance
with Army Regulation 140-111 (U.S. Army Reserve Enlistment
Program)."
4. Item 10c of Section B (Agreements) of the DD Form 4, initialed by the applicant, shows that the agreements in this section and the attached annex(es) were all the promises made to the applicant by the Government and that anything else anyone promised the applicant was not valid and would not be honored.
5. The applicant's records show that she attended basic combat training at Fort McClellan, Alabama, during the period 1 June 1981 through 14 August 1981. The DD Form 214 she was issued confirms that she was honorably relieved from active duty for completion of her initial active duty training (IADT).
6. On 15 April 1981, Headquarters, 90th U.S. Army Reserve Command, San Antonio, Texas, published Orders Number 057-9004-04, ordering the applicant to annual training during the period 12 July 1981 through 25 July 1981.
7. On 13 August 1981, the applicant was issued a certificate of training certifying that she had completed "on the job training" in MOS 03C (Physical Activities Specialist), at Fort Drum, New York.
8. On 6 March 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) in pay grade E-2 for a period of 4 years. Item 10b, Section B, of her DD Form 4 stated:
"Individual enlisting for remainder of obligation of 4 years,
3 months, and 17 days; expiration of term of service (ETS)
22 June 1986; enlisting for ARNG-ROTC (Reserve Officer
Training Corps) Simultaneous Membership Program."
9. On 22 May 1982, U.S. Army ROTC Instructor Group, Lexington, Missouri, published Orders Number 6-1 discharging the applicant from the USAR for the purpose of accepting a commission in the U.S. Armed Forces. She was appointed as a commissioned officer of the United States in the grade of 2nd lieutenant effective 22 August 1983.
10. On 22 April 1988 and in lieu of academic elimination from the Adjutant General Basic Course for consistently failing to meet physical fitness standards, the applicant requested voluntary discharge from the USAR in accordance with chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-100 (Personnel Separations-Officer). She was honorably discharged on 7 September 1988.
11. In an undated self-authored statement, the applicant states that she enlisted in the USAR during her junior year of high school. She further adds that she attended basic training in the summer of 1980 and trained at Fort Drum, New York, as a recreational specialist in the summer of 1981. She concludes that she never received her bonus.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that she is entitled to payment of an MOS bonus.
2. Evidence of record shows that upon her initial enlistment in the USAR, the applicant did not enlist for a bonus option. She was simply interested in a particular type of training, unit of assignment, MOS, and bonus. The only promise made to her was the "Alternate Training Program". There is no evidence of any promises made by her recruiter.
3. The Alternate Training Program is a split option program for USAR enlistment only, where applicants are allowed to enlist during their junior year of high school, complete basic training during the summer break between their junior year and senior year, then go back to school to finish their senior year. At the end of their senior year, the applicants attend advanced individual training. There is no bonus associated with the Alternate Bonus Program.
4. In view of the foregoing evidence, the applicant is not entitled to relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ena___ __dll___ __rmn___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
Eric N. Anderson
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070009342
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20071120
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
112.1100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083807C070212
The available records contain the applicant’s enlistment contract and his pay records. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant completed advanced individual training (AIT) or was awarded a military occupational specialty (MOS). The applicant attended basic training from 20 June 1994 through 25 August 1994.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017432
The Board recommended that all Department of the Army records of the applicant be corrected by amending his enlistment contract to include the sentence, If an enlistment bonus is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the Cash Enlistment Bonus Program and the Government fails to verify that the Soldier actually is eligible and such failure results in nonpayment of the bonus, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records may pay the bonus, at its sole...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011525
This form shows her last name as "C-------" and her first name as "J--------." This form shows her last name as "C------" and her first name as "J--------." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 that captures her period of ADT from 6 January 2008 through 19 January 2008 with an entry-level status characterization of service; and b. reissuing the applicant an Honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508994C070209
The applicant states that she completed a valid enlistment contract containing a SRIP addendum for a $5,000.00 SRIP bonus. She was later denied her SRIP bonus installment payments and told that the one SRIP payment she had already received would be collected back from her. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected: a. by showing that the individual concerned was entitled to a $5,000.00 SRIP skill bonus for MOS 94B; and b. by refunding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001118
Paragraph 5 of his DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to active duty as an enlisted Soldier for a period of not more than four years or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, could order the cadet to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019293
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In this case, the applicant's record confirms she completed the AIT portion of her split training that resulted in her being awarded MOS 94B between 11 June and 16 August 1986, which is properly recorded in Items 12a and 12c of her DD Form 214. The applicants record also shows that she completed the basic training portion of her IADT between 5 June and 7 August 1985 which is properly documented on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060609C070421
On 25 October 1994, the Oklahoma State University PMS, notified the applicant that he was initiating action to disenroll her from the ROTC program due to her frequent absence from military science classes, labs, and physical training sessions. In summary, her father was informed that the applicant’s performance while attending the University of Miami was not the bases for her disenrollment as she did not withdraw from ROTC until she attended Oklahoma State University, and that the Oklahoma...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012317
His enlistment bonus for 6 years is shown as $2,000.00 with the stipulation of payment as follows: a. initial payment of one half of the total after receiving his secondary school diploma, completing IADT, and qualifying in an MOS; and b. two subsequent payments of one quarter of the total upon completion of the 2nd and 4th years of service; 3. With his completion of MOS training, the applicant met the final requirement for the enlistment bonus. Payment of the total $2,000.00 is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009853
The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 25 May 1985, that shows she was honorably REFRAD after completing 3 years of total active service. In support of her application, the applicant provides a DA Form 873 that shows, in pertinent part, she was granted a Secret security clearance on 23 May 1979; a DA Form 134 that shows she successfully completed 4 years of instruction in the Senior ROTC on 15 May 1981; 2 pages of a DA Form 2-1...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022193
On 10 May 2010, her ROTC commander submitted a recommendation to the U.S. Army Cadet Command, that the applicant be disenrolled from the ROTC program and be required to repay her scholarships monies in the amount of $12,690.50. In a memorandum to the Commander, U.S. Army Cadet Command, dated 15 November 2011, the Assistant Secretary of the Army stated the applicant's appeal was reviewed, it was determined her debt was valid, and he directed she be ordered to repay educational expenses in...