Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009243C080213
Original file (20070009243C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 November 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070009243 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mrs. Nancy L. Amos

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. William D. Powers

Chairperson

Mr. Gerald J. Purcell

Member

Mr. John G. Heck

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his military service time for the Cuban Missile Crisis be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant makes no additional statement.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 September 1958.  He was honorably released from active duty on 9 September 1961.  There is no evidence of record to show that he was recalled to active duty after his September 1961 separation.

3.  On 23 August 1962, President Kennedy called a meeting of the National Security Council to air concerns that Soviet missiles were in the process of being introduced into Cuba.  On 31 August 1962, the President was informed that a    29 August 1962 U-2 mission confirmed the presence of surface-to-air-missile batteries in Cuba.  In October 1962, the President confronted the Soviet ambassador with the findings.  On 24 October 1962, ships of the U. S. Navy blockaded Cuba.  On 28 October 1962, Soviet Premier Khrushchev broadcast a message on Radio Moscow stating that the cited batteries would be dismantled and returned to the Soviet Union.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was released from active duty in September 1961, a year prior to the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis.  There is no evidence of record to show he was recalled to active duty to serve during the Crisis.  

2.  Even if the applicant had been recalled to active duty during that Crisis, the DD Form 214 is only a snapshot of a member’s service at the time of separation; therefore, service during the Crisis would not be entered on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 September 1961.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wdp___  __gjp___  __jgh___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__William D. Powers___
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070009243
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20071127
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Ms. Mitrano
ISSUES         1.
100.00
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2011-016

    Original file (2011-016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 23, 2011, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who was honorably discharged from the Coast Guard in 1966, asked the Board to correct his discharge form DD 214 to show that he received a medal for participating in the Cuban Missile Crisis1 and to have the Coast Guard issue a DD 215 showing all of the medals and citations he received. All of the medals that a Coast Guard member could receive for serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001584

    Original file (20150001584 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was ordered to active duty in support of a contingency operation during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015901C080407

    Original file (20070015901C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the period of the applicant's honorable active duty service entitles him to the NDSM, and that his service in Korea between 1962 and 1963 entitles him to the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 26 June 1963 DD Form 214 by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021485

    Original file (20130021485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no substantiating evidence that the applicant served in direct support or within the area of eligibility for which the AFEM was authorized for operations in the Cuban Missile Crisis. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the NDSM to the awards already listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009583C070206

    Original file (20050009583C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) is a military award of the United States military which was first created in 1961 by Executive Order of President John Kennedy. The first campaign of the AFEM was the Cuban Missile Crisis and the award was issued to those who served in the designated area of operation during the period of 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. However, the criteria for award of the AFEM required that individuals must serve in the designated area of operations in order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010608C080213

    Original file (20070010608C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides orders, dated 6 March 1962, assigning him to Fort Benning, GA; his DD Form 214; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 8 April 1965; his Honorable Discharge Certificate; a letter, dated 5 July 2001, from the Review Boards Agency Support Division; two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1552), both dated 5 April 2001; an Army Precommission Extension Course diploma; three subcourse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886

    Original file (20090007886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011658

    Original file (20120011658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is authorized for 30 consecutive days of service at a normal post of duty service in Berlin between 9 May 1945 and 2 October 1990. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011658 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011658 2 ARMY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000109

    Original file (20090000109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing in addition to the award shown on his DD Form 214, effective 24 December 1956, his authorized awards include the Korea Defense Service Medal and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010705

    Original file (20080010705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested that he be awarded the AFEM, but item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 does not show that he served overseas at any time during his active duty service. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he ever served in the designated area of operations of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis...