Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008414
Original file (20070008414.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  05 February 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070008414 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Deyon D. Battle

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Kenneth L. Wright

Chairperson

Mr. Antonio Uribe

Member

Mr. Ronald D. Gant

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a recalculation of his retirement points.

2.  The applicant states that the last drill he was credited for was on 17 September 1992, and that he has been credited for drilling 29 January 1993. He states that he has been credited with 2535 career points, and that he should have been credited with 2727 career points.  

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application, a copy of his Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) and a copy of his Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement dated 21 December 1992.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant entered the Regular Army on 15 September 1952.  On 24 August 1954, after completing 1 year, 11 months and 10 days of total active service, he was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR).  The applicant was honorably discharged from USAR on 1 July 1960, at the expiration of his term of service.  He had completed 5 years, 10 months and 11 days of total inactive service.

3.  On 28 July 1974, the applicant enlisted in the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG) for 1 year.  He remained a member of the NJARNG through a series of reenlistments and extensions.

4.  Orders Number 036-021 was published on 5 February 1993, honorably discharging the applicant from the NJARNG, with an effective date of 29 January 1993, and placing him on the Retired List.

5.  The NGB Form 22 that he was furnished at the time of his discharge shows that he completed 26 years, 3 months and 19 days of total service for pay purposes.

6.  The Army National Guard Retirement Point History Statement, dated 21 December 1992, that the applicant submitted in support of his application shows that he was credited with 2727 total career points, 2535 total points for retired pay and 20 year, 00 months and 29 days of creditable service for retired pay.

7.  On 30 September 1993, the applicant's retirement points were recomputed, and he was credited with 2760 total career points, 2561 total points for retired pay and 20 years, 5 months and 11 days of creditable service for retired pay.  His National Guard Retirement Points History Statement shows that for the period covering 28 July 1992 through 29 January 1993, which was the final entry made to his statement prior to his retirement, he was credited with 20 inactive duty points, 8 membership points, 7 active duty points, 35 total career points, 35 total points for retired pay, and 6 months and 1 day of creditable service for retired pay.  The applicant was furnished a copy of the recomputed retirement statement on 13 December 1993.

8.  During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the United States Army Human Resources Command, Retirements and Annuities, Human Resource Specialist, who opined that the applicant was retired with the correct amount of retirement points to include a recomputation of his retirement points.  The Human Resource Specialist stated that he retired effective 29 January 1993 and that he can not drill and retire on the same day.  The Human Resources Specialist stated that she was forwarding the applicant a copy of his final statement of retirement.

9.  The applicant was furnished a copy of the advisory opinion on 24 September 2007.  To date, there has been no response from the applicant regarding the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There appears to be no error made in the computation of the applicant's retirement points.



2.  The applicant's service was not correctly computed on 21 December 1992; however, his service was recomputed on 30 September 1993, and he was credited with appropriate amount of career points, points for retired pay, and creditable service for retired pay.

3.  The applicant has provided no evidence to show that the recomputation that was accomplished on 30 September 1993 is incorrect; therefore, there is no basis for granting his request.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KLW__  __AU___  __RDG___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




____Kenneth L. Wright____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070008414
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20080205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.  334
135.0200/RETIREMENT POINTS CREDIT
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009744

    Original file (20060009744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR granted relief to the applicant by allowing him service credit from the date he was placed in the Retired Reserve until his reinstatement in the IRR. The applicant also requested “compensation or relief for colonel promotion boards.” If the applicant is selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board sufficiently early, his records should be submitted to a Special Selection Board for promotion consideration to colonel under the appropriate criteria. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013041

    Original file (20140013041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing his period of Inactive National Guard (ING) service started on 11 October 1994. This document also shows that his anniversary year end date was changed to 24 September 1994 causing him to be 16 days short of completing a full year of service in an active status. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected by showing his anniversary year end for 1994 as 10 October 1994, and his period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012192

    Original file (20130012192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. c. NGB Form 22 that shows he enlisted in the NJARNG on 27 August 1968 and was separated on 5 March 1976. f. Letter from the NJARNG to a Member of Congress, dated 20 March 2013, advising him that based on the documents the applicant submitted, the NJARNG determined he completed 18 years and 11 months of military service.

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-079

    Original file (2011-079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 29, 2011, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST, ALLEGATION, AND EVIDENCE The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he retired from the Coast Guard Reserve under the Reserve Transition Benefits (RTB)1 program with 15 years, 8 months, and 8 days of creditable service instead of being discharged in 1992.  The applicant was assigned to Coast Guard Reserve Unit Pittsburgh [in the SELRES] from September 1984 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018469

    Original file (20090018469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states in July 2009 when he asked for assistance with his retirement packet he was informed he was ineligible for retired pay and all of his other retirement points documents were worthless and would be revoked. The applicant provided a USAR chronological statement of retirement points, dated 7 September 2006, which shows he completed 20 years and 3 days of qualifying service for retired pay as of 12 April 1999. This letter states: * the applicant resigned his commission in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008243

    Original file (20090008243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he attended every monthly drill with his unit from 4 August 1992 through 3 August 1997. The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), DD Form 214N (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), orders to active duty, certificate for award of the Army Achievement Medal, Certificate of Achievement, Certificate of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003915

    Original file (20080003915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows that when the applicant made application for retired pay benefits, he was advised he had only 19 years, 8 months, and 28 days of creditable service for retirement and he was not eligible to receive retired pay. Based on the evidence and equity consideration in this case, the applicant is entitled to: a. have his discharge from the Army National Guard and transfer to the Retired Reserve on 17 November 1992 revoked; b. have a correction made to his ARPC Form 249-2-E,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057160C070420

    Original file (2001057160C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that when he retired from Army National Guard (ARNG) Active Guard Reserve (AGR) duty status on 30 March 1995, the law including Reserve retirement points (1405 service) for enlisted personnel had just been passed on 5 October 1994, as Public Law 103-337, section 635. The computations for his retired pay did not correctly include his retirement points from 1405 service. The AGR-USAR (U. S. Army Reserve) Separation Branch, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051166C070420

    Original file (2001051166C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that when he retired from Army National Guard (ARNG) Active Guard Reserve (AGR) duty status on 30 March 1995, the law including Reserve retirement points (1405 service) for enlisted personnel had just been passed on 5 October 1994, as Public Law 103-337, section 635. The computations for his retired pay did not correctly include his retirement points from 1405 service. The AGR-USAR (U. S. Army Reserve) Separation Branch, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command...