Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006784
Original file (20070006784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	


	BOARD DATE:	  25 October 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070006784 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Chairperson

Mr. Scott W. Faught

Member

Mr. Roland S. Venable

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 9 (Command to Which Transferred), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that item 9, of his DD Form 214, shows that he was transferred to the USAR (United States Army Reserve) CON GP (Control Group) (RET [Retired]).  He was advised by the DEERS (Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System) Army Reserve Control Office that this entry is incorrect and should have been coded differently for an active duty retiree.  As coded, it gave the impression that he was a reservist when he retired and not eligible for benefits until age 60. 

3.  He served on active duty from 6 June 1973 through 31 December 2003.  He assumed the entry in item 9, of his DD Form 214, was correct and he was transferred to a Reserve Control Group since retirees could be recalled to active duty.  He recently applied for the mail order prescription pharmacy, and his application was rejected.  He was told that the DEERS indicated that he was ineligible.  He believes that his DD Form 214 was coded incorrectly because of confusion at the transfer point regarding his status.  They believed that he was an AGR (Active Guard Reserve) officer because he served as the IG (Inspector General) for the AL (Alabama) NG (National Guard).  He informed them that he was active duty and assigned to Falls Church, with duty at Montgomery, Alabama.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, and a copy of his retirement order, with amendments, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s military records show he was commissioned in the Regular Army as a second lieutenant (2LT/O-1) effective 6 June 1973.  He was promoted to colonel (COL/O-6) effective 1 April 1996. 

3.  The applicant served until he was separated for the purpose of retirement on 31 December 2003.  He was placed on the Retired List effective 1 January 2004, in the rank and pay grade of COL/O-6.  He had completed 30 years, 6 months, and 25 days of active creditable service.

4.  Item 9, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry "USAR CON GP (RET)          AR-PERSCOM (US Army Personnel Command – now known as the Army Human Resources Command), 9700 Page Blvd, St. Louis, Mo 63132."

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that item 9 (Command to Which Transferred) will be completed to show the entry of "NA" when the applicant is placed on the AUS (Army of the United States) Retired List and not transferred to the Retired Reserve (applicable to RA enlisted (with 30 or more years AFS (Active Federal Service)); or the USA Retired List (applicable to RA officers); or TDRL (Temporary Disability Retired List); or permanent disability list.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant was separated for the purpose of retirement on 31 December 2003.  He was placed on the USA Retired List effective 1 January 2004, in the rank of COL, after completion of more than 30 years of AFS.

2.  Item 9, of his DD Form 214, shows that he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired).  However, regulations require that item 9, of his DD Form 214, show the entry "NA" when an RA officer with 30 or more years of AFS is placed on the USA Retired List.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of item 9, of his DD Form 214 to show the entry, "NA."









BOARD VOTE:

__LDS__  __RSV___  _SWF___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the entry "NA" in item 9 (Command to Which Transferred), of his 31 December 2003 DD Form 214.




_____Linda D. Simmons______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070006784
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20071025
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
20031231
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 600-8-24
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025676

    Original file (20100025676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017550

    Original file (20080017550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Table 2-1 states that when the Soldier retires (including temporary and permanent disability), and is placed on the Army of the United States (AUS) retired list and is transferred to the Retired Reserve (applicable to Regular Army (RA) enlisted Soldiers with less than 30 years active Federal service (AFS) and Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010236

    Original file (20070010236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 9 (Command to Which Transferred), of his DD Form 214, shows the entry "NA"; item 12a (Dated Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) shows the entry "1986 01 11" (11 January 1986); item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), shows the entry "0022 04 20" (22 years, 4 months, and 20 days); item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) show the entry "0000 00 15" (15 days); item 12f (Foreign Service) shows the entry "0000 00 00"; and item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows the entry "1984 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014902

    Original file (20080014902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Chapter 3 (Board Schedules and Procedures), Section III (Promotion Reconsideration Boards), paragraph 3-22 (Correction of military records as a result of a special selection board action), provides, if the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013866

    Original file (20140013866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Table 2-1, Rule 3, provided that for Regular Army commissioned officers who were discharged (including those who resigned their commission) and accepted appointment in the USAR, the entry in Item 9 would show the officer was assigned to the USAR CON GP (Annual Training or Reinforcement, as appropriate); and c. for Item 23, enter the appropriate term (REFRAD, Discharge, Retirement, REFRAD and Order to Active Duty in Another Status, Release from Active Duty for Training (ADT), Release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011631

    Original file (20060011631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant voluntarily retired from active duty in the rank of LTC (O-5) with 25 years and 23 days active service, effective 1 January 2006. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant retired from active duty, effective 1 January 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. promoting the applicant to the rank of COL (O-6), effective and with a date of rank of 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017622

    Original file (20060017622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant voluntarily retired from active duty in the rank of LTC (O-5) with 25 years and 23 days active service, effective 1 January 2006. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant retired from active duty, effective 1 January 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. promoting the applicant to the rank of COL (O-6), effective and with a date of rank of 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013029

    Original file (20140013029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that he would have continued on active duty until his MRD for maximum years of commissioned service (30 June 2015) had it not been for the improperly conducted CY11 ARNG AGR REFRAD Board which selected him for REFRAD. Though it is not possible to know whether he would have been selected by a "properly" conducted REFRAD board, it is reasonable to presume he would have served until 30 June 2015 if he had not been selected for REFRAD by the CY11 ARNG AGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008410

    Original file (20060008410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 9, Block g (Remarks) of the DD Form 261 shows, in pertinent part, that while participating in a Field Training Exercise (FTX) during Annual Training (AT), on order of the battalion commander, the applicant was transported to Camp Shelby Hospital for an evaluation due to several problems, including stress during the FTX. The applicant's military service records are absent a report of any medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB) proceedings. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010949

    Original file (20060010949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 9 (Command to Which Transferred) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show “Troop A, 2nd Squadron, 106th Cavalry, (WX4ZA0), 825 Reynolds Street, Pontiac, IL 61764.” 2. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and was released from active duty on 26 July 2006. Evidence of record also shows that he enlisted in the Army National Guard effective 27 July 2006 and was...