Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004809
Original file (20070004809.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  21 August 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070004809 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Conrad V. Meyer

Chairperson

Mr. Dale E. DeBruler

Member

Ms. Ernestine R. Moya

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show awards of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam but refused the Purple Heart.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the orders and citation awarding him the Bronze Star Medal in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 November 1967.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  The highest rank he attained while on active duty was sergeant/pay grade E-5.  He was honorably discharged and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group on 10 October 1969.

3.  The applicant's records further show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 15 October 1968 through 14 October 1969.  He was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade.

4.  Item 26 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entries for wounds received. 

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.  However, it shows award of the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  There are no medical records in the applicant's official military personnel file that show he sustained wounds as a result of hostile action or that show he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.

8.  There are no general orders in the applicant's records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

9.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. 

10.  Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 9591, dated 21 September 1969 show that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam.

11.  Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 2, dated 1971.

13.  Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

14.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI, the TET 69 Counteroffensive, and the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

15.  A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal.
16.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

17.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contends that he is entitled to awards of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  There is no evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds while in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart in this case.

3.  General Orders show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

4.  General Orders show the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which is not shown on his separation document.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. 

5.  Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, records show the applicant participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of four bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal.

6.  Evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 9 November 1967 through 10 October 1968.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to 
award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__cvm___  __ded___  __erm___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart. 




							Conrad V. Meyer
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070004809
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070821
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
107.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068804C070402

    Original file (2002068804C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal, the appropriate number of "campaign stars" on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Action Ribbon, and an undefined "V" award. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that he was ever recommended for, or awarded a Bronze Star Medal. The Board notes that the Combat Action Ribbon is a Navy/Marine Corps award and as such,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002716

    Original file (20070002716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR 672-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010484

    Original file (20080010484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1968, in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010994

    Original file (20080010994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart, and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Army Commendation Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster. However, absent orders awarding him a second Army Commendation Medal, there is insufficient basis for correcting his military records to show a second award of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017844

    Original file (20080017844.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a copy of a Purple Heart Certificate, dated 28 September 1968, showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 27 September 1968; and a copy of Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division General Orders Number 6602, dated 11 June 1969 and citation showing award of the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service during the period July 1968 to June 1969 in support of his request. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014445

    Original file (20090014445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in October 1968 in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 11 October 1966 through 14 May 1969; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019942

    Original file (20090019942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010126

    Original file (20080010126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 28 April 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006074

    Original file (20080006074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award. Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in 6 campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the "Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster)" from the DD Form 214 and adding the "Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster);" b. deleting the "BSM with "V"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071654C070402

    Original file (2002071654C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the...