Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006074
Original file (20080006074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        30 OCTOBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006074 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) and the Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served 2 tours of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and these awards were not annotated on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his order awarding him the BSM with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) and a copy of his Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) Award Certificate, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 5 December 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 71H (Personnel Specialist).  He attained the grade of specialist five/E-5.  On 11 July 1969, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  On 4 December 1972, he was honorably discharged from the USAR upon completion of his statutory military obligation. 

3.  The applicant served in the RVN from 5 December 1967 through 22 July 1968.  He performed duties as a personnel specialist with the 101st Administration Company, and as an armor intelligence specialist with Troop B, 2nd Squadron, 17th Cavalry (Airmobile).  

4.  The applicant served again in the RVN from 25 January 1969 through 22 May 1969.  He performed duties as a personnel management specialist with Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 11th Transportation Company and with the 1099th Transportation Company.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart and the BSM with "V" Device.  On 20 September 2007, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) which corrected his DD Form 214 to show the Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster).  

6.  There are no medical records in the available military personnel file that show the applicant sustained wounds as a result of hostile action or that show he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action for a third time.  However, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does show that he was a patient on 5 May 1969.  The applicant also provided a copy of his Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) Award Certificate showing he was wounded on 5 May 1969.

7.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster shows the applicant's casualty status code was "23" each time he was wounded in action.  This code indicates the status "hostile wounded in action, not serious hospitalized."  The Vietnam Casualty Roster shows he was wounded on 20 April 1968, 27 April 1968, and on the third occasion, 5 May 1969.

8.  General Orders Number 1327, Department of the Army (DA), Headquarters (HQ), U.S. Army Support Command, Saigon, dated 10 October 1969, awarded the applicant the BSM with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for action on
5 May 1969.  There is no evidence in his official record showing that he received the BSM with "V" Device (Second Oak Leaf Cluster).
9.  Review of the applicant's record indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

8.  The applicant's records show that he received ratings of excellent in conduct and efficiency.  There is no evidence the applicant was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to
22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970.

11.  The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars.  However, his records indicate he participated in
6 campaigns:  the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III; the Tet Counteroffensive; the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV; the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V; the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VI; and the Tet 69 Counteroffensive, 1969 campaigns.

12.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 lists all approved Army campaigns, including campaigns of the Vietnam War.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  This regulation also states that a silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the first oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the Purple Heart.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's name is on the Vietnam Casualty Roster showing that he was wounded for the third time on 5 May 1969.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) and to have his record corrected to show this award.

2.  General Orders awarded the applicant the BSM with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to have his record corrected to show this award.

3.  There is no evidence in the applicant's official record that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) and the applicant has not provided any evidence of this third award.  Therefore, there is no basis upon which to grant this request.

4.  The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for the first award of the AGCM.  There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the AGCM for the period 5 December 1966 through 11 July 1969 and to correction of his records to show the award of the AGCM (First Award).

5.  General Orders awarded the applicant's unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which is not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this foreign unit award.

6.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in 6 campaigns during his service in the RVN.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of 1 silver star and 1 bronze service star to be affixed on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  ____X____  __X______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the "Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster)" from the DD Form 214 and adding the "Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster);"
	
b.  deleting the "BSM with "V" Device" from the DD Form 214 and adding the "BSM with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster)";

	c.  awarding the AGCM (First Award) for the qualifying period of 
5 December 1966 through 11 July 1969 and correcting the record to show this award;

	d.  authorizing the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and correcting the record to show this award; and 

	e.  deleting the "Vietnam Service Medal with 2 campaign stars" from the DD Form 214 and adding the "Vietnam Service Medal with 1 silver service star and
1 bronze service star."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the BSM with "V" Device (Second Oak Leaf Cluster).



      _________XXX_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006074



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006074



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021146

    Original file (20120021146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * page from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * two photographs * memorandum, subject: Authorization for Individual Foreign Award, dated 9 June 1970 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 4 January 1968 to 20 October 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017135

    Original file (20090017135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd Award), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 38 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 also shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments, and his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001769

    Original file (20090001769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The record further shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; b. awarding him the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 16 November 1967 through 18 August 1969; c. adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005413

    Original file (20110005413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) - he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Squadron, 1st Cavalry Division (Air Mobile) RVN from 28 June 1968 to 13 June 1969; c. Item 38 - he had all "excellent' conduct and efficiency ratings; d. Item 40 (Wounds) - he sustained fragment wounds to his back and both arms on 9 March 1969; and e. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005956

    Original file (20110005956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Official orders on file announcing his award of the BSM w/"V" Device confirm the applicant was wounded in action while serving in the RVN on 29 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 29 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019340

    Original file (20080019340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award the applicant the PH for wounds sustained in action in the RVN on 13 May 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027

    Original file (20090003027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012834

    Original file (20080012834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH and the BSM for three separate periods, and that these awards were announced in official orders. As a result, Item 24 of the applicant’s separation document should be corrected to add the PH and to show his entitlement to the BSM with 2nd OLC to denote three awards instead of two awards of the BSM. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016375C080407

    Original file (20070016375C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the BSM, AM and CIB while serving on active duty and these awards were erroneously omitted from the list of awards contained on his separation document. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The applicant's record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, he is entitled to the RVN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017868

    Original file (20080017868.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 November 1965 through 28 September 1968. As a result, absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows he was awarded the BSM with oak leaf cluster while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...