Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003181
Original file (20110003181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003181 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct date of discharge and total active service.

2.  The applicant states his discharge date was 21 July 1971 vice 28 July 1971.  He further states he had 98 days of service vice 22 days as reflected on his
DD Form 214.  He further states on 9 January 1971, he was transported by a detective to Fort McPherson, GA, where he worked for 3 weeks wrapping meat while on active duty.  The applicant further states on 28 April 1971, he was the duty Soldier at Fort Gordon for 4 months while in the stockade prior to his discharge on 21 July 1971; therefore, he had more than 98 days active service.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 May 1970 for a period of 2 years.

3.  He received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice on 8 June 1970 for being absent without leave (AWOL) for the period 31 May 1970 to 4 June 1970.

4.  The applicant’s record contains DA Form 20B (Insert Sheet to DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Record of Court-Martial Conviction) which shows he was AWOL during the period:

* 11 June 1970 to 7 January 1971
* 12 January 1971 to 27 April 1971

5.  Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code and Subsequent to Normal Date ETS) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he was in a confinement status on 28 April 1971.

6.  Special Orders Number 208, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army School/
Training Center, Fort Gordon, GA, dated 28 July 1971, shows he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Transfer Point, Fort Gordon with a reporting date of 28 July 1971 for separation processing.

7.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was discharged on 28 July 1971.

8.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-212 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Unfitness and Unsuitability) by reason of unsuitability, character and behavorial disorders.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

	a.  Item 11d (Effective Date (of separation)) the entry 28 July 1971;

	b.  Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) the entry "0  0  22";

	c.  Item 22a(3) (Total) the entry "0  0  22"

	d.  Item 22b (Total Active Service) the entry "0  0  22"

	e.  Item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost (Preceding Two Years)) the entry "413 days lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 972 from 31 May 1970 thru
3 June 1970; 11 June 1970 thru 8 January 1971; and 12 January 1971 thru
27 July 1971"; and

	f.  Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged) the applicant authenticated this document with his signature.

9.  The evidence of record shows the applicant performed creditable time from  19 May 1970 through 30 May 1970; 4 June 1970 through 10 June 1970; and
9 January 1971 through 11 January 1971, for periods of 12, 7, and 3 days respectively.  

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  This regulation specified that the
DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  

11.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  Section III contains preparation instructions for the DD Form 214.  It states for:

* Item 11d, enter the date separation is accomplished
* Item 22a(1), enter the total service completed between date inducted and separation date of the DD Form 214, less time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972
* Item 22a(2), enter all prior service excluding any service shown in Item 22a(1)
* Item 22a(3), enter the total of line 22a(1) plus line 22a(2)
* Item 22b, enter the total active service the individual has completed beginning with the earliest period of active service up to and including the current period of active duty, less time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his discharge date and total active service time is incorrect on his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and found to be without merit.
2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty on 19 May 1970 and he received a general discharge on 28 July 1971 with multiple periods of time lost due to being AWOL and in confinement.

3.  The evidence of record further shows the applicant only performed creditable active service from 19 May 1970 through 30 May 1970; 4 June 1970 through
10 June 1970; and 9 January 1971 through 11 January 1971, for a total of
22 days, which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003181



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003181



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029546

    Original file (20100029546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 28 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029546 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show service credit for all of the time he spent on active duty. Item 22b (Total Active Service) - "0 years, 2 months, and 11 days" c. Item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) the entries: * 14 May 1969 - 20 May 1969 * 26 May 1969 - 27 June 1969 * 30 July 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028921

    Original file (20100028921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He was discharged on 5 October 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010502

    Original file (20080010502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence clearly shows that he completed 4 months and 10 days of total active service. However, the evidence clearly shows that he only completed 4 months and 10 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the entry, "0 4 10," in item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period), of his DD Form 214; and b. showing the entry "0 4 10," in item 22b (Total Active Service), of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001705

    Original file (20070001705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001705 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost [Preceding Two years]), of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), which shows the entry "6APR71 –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008581

    Original file (20100008581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation further states when a member returned from an absence that is or appears to be unauthorized, the unit commander will informally investigate the case at once. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows the AWOL time during the period 25 September 1969 - 4 November 1969 was to be made good per the letter from the 257th Replacement Company, dated 11 April 1970. Therefore, this portion of his DD Form, 214 should be corrected to remove the erroneous period of AWOL and to show 40...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008233

    Original file (20080008233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge and correction of his records as follows: a. correction of entries pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969 and 1 May 1969 to 13 June 1969), in Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); b. correction of an entry pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969), in Item 44 (Lost Time) of his DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); c. correction of the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000265

    Original file (20110000265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further stated: a. item 22a(1) would show the total service between dates shown in items 10c or 17c and 11d of the DD Form 214, as represented by continual and foreign service, less time lost; b. item 22a(2) would show all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1); c. item 22a(3) is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024991

    Original file (20100024991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, he requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) by showing: * his date of birth as 4 November 1949 * his entry date on active duty as 7 July 1969 * his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) * any and all military awards to which he is entitled 2. Therefore, Item 24 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062850C070421

    Original file (2001062850C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 2 March 1972 to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (automotive maintenance) instead of 94B (cook). He also requests that his date of entry on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 28 November 1968 be corrected to show 22 March 1968 instead of 29 November 1968. Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of...