Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016875
Original file (20060016875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060016875 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. John J. Wendland, Jr.

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Chairperson

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the total prior active service shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214, dated 11 October 2006, does not show the correct total prior active service he completed because it was based on erroneous information contained on the DD Form 214 he was issued when he was discharged from the U.S. Air Force (USAF) on 14 June 2000.  The applicant also states, in effect, he submitted a request to the USAF to correct the DD Form 214, dated 14 June 2000, and received a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated
20 November 2006, showing he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 24 days net active service.  The applicant further states, in effect, that based on the correction by the USAF to his previous discharge document, he now requests correction of the DD Form 214, dated 11 October 2006, that was issued by the U.S. Army.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center, Fort Benning, Georgia, memorandum, undated, subject: Correction to DD Form 214, along with his email request, dated 22 November 2006; DD Form 214, dated 14 June 2000; Headquarters, USAF Academy, Colorado, memorandum, dated 20 November 2006, subject: Application for Correction of Military Records (DD Form 149) [Applicant's Name], BC-2006-03442 BCMR Case 01; DD Form 215, dated 20 November 2006; and DD Form 214, dated 11 October 2006.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military service records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 27 June 2006 to attend the Officer Candidate Course.

2.  The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 11 October 2006.  This document shows that the applicant completed the Officer Candidate Course and was honorably discharged, in the rank of sergeant/pay grade E-5, to accept a commission in the U.S. Army.  Item 12 (Record of Service), block c (Net Active Service This Period), shows that he completed 3 months and 15 days net active service.  Item 12, block d (Total Prior Active Service), shows he was credited with 11 months and 14 days total prior active service.

3.  On 12 October 2006, the applicant was appointed a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army in the rank of second lieutenant/pay grade O-2.  He is currently serving on active duty in the U.S. Army.

4.  The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he was honorably discharged from the USAF on 14 June 2000.  Item 18 (Remarks) of this document shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant attended the USAF Academy in a Cadet status from 1 July 1999 to 14 June 2000.  Item 12, block c, shows that he was credited with completing 11 months and 14 days net active service during this period.

5.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, USAF Academy, Colorado, memorandum, dated 20 November 2006, that shows, in pertinent part, the Noncommissioned Officer in Charge, Cadet Personnel Branch, USAF Academy, Colorado, acknowledged that she corrected the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 14 June 2000, by issuing a DD Form 215.  The applicant also provides a copy of a DD Form 215, dated 20 November 2006.  This document shows that Item 12, block a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214 was changed from "1999 Jul 01"  and corrected to read, "1998 Jul 22".  This document also shows that Item 12, block c, of the DD Form 214 was changed from "00 [years], 11 [months], 14 [days]" to
"01 [years],10 [months], 24 [days]."  There is no indication on the DD Form 215 that Item 18 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 was corrected, which, in pertinent part, contains information concerning the applicant's period of attendance at the USAF Academy.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separation - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 provides instructions for the preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the Enlisted/Officer Record Brief, separation approval authority documentation, separation order, or any other document authorized for filing in the Official Military Personnel File.  The Separation Documents regulation instructions for completing Item 12 (Record of Service), Block d (Total Prior Active Service), provide, in pertinent part, to "enter the total amount of prior active military service less lost time, if any."


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 issued by the U.S. Army with an effective date of 11 October 2006, should be corrected to show
1 year, 10 months, and 24 days total prior active service because the USAF recently corrected his active duty service on his previously issued DD Form 214, dated 14 June 2000, based on a correction to the date he entered active duty.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the date the applicant entered active duty as a Cadet in the USAF was changed from 1 July 1999 and corrected to 22 July 1998.  Thus, the evidence of record shows that the applicant's period of service as a Cadet in the USAF was from 22 July 1998 through 14 June 2000.  The evidence of record also shows that a USAF official corrected the applicant's
DD Form 214 to show that he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 24 days net active service during this period.

3.  Based on the correction made to the date the applicant entered active duty in the USAF, as recorded on the discharge documents issued by the USAF, calculation of the applicant's net active service for the period shows he actually completed 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days net active service during the period under review.  Thus, the correction made to Item 12, block c, of the applicant's DD Form 214 (dated 14 June 2000) is in error by 1 day.  (It is also noted that the information contained in Item 18 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 may be in error in view of the correction made to Item 12, block a.)  Therefore, the applicant is advised to contact the USAF concerning correction of the net active service for the period covered by his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 14 June 2000.

4.  In this regard, based on the evidence of record, and in view of the foregoing, Item 12, block d, of the applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of
11 October 2006, should be corrected to show 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days total prior active service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__ LMD     ___EEM_  ___RMN_  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 11 October 2006, as follows:

	Item 12  (Record of Service)

		    Block d  (Total Prior Active Service):
			       (Year(s), Month(s), Day(s))

		    Delete:  "0000  11  14"

		    Add:      "0001  10  23"

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting the applicant's total prior active service to show 1 year, 10 months, and 24 days.  




____LaVerne M. Douglas____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060016875
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
2007/06/12
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
20061011
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-200, Paragraph 16-1a 
DISCHARGE REASON
Accept Commission or Warrant in the US Army
BOARD DECISION
GRANT PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Ms. Mitrano
ISSUES         1.
100.0000.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001012

    Original file (20140001012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) - 2000-05-27 * Item 12b (Separation date This Period) - 2004-11-29 * Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) - 0008-04-29 * Item 18 (Remarks) – “Block 12c includes service as a USMA cadet from 19970701 to 20000526” 5. For a Soldier who has cadet status, enter "Block 12c includes service as a USMA cadet From (date) To (date); Service not creditable for any purpose in commissioned officer status." As a result, the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-103

    Original file (2010-103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2010-103 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct her discharge form DD 214 to show in block 12.a. The Coast Guard recommended that the Board deny relief, stating that under Article 12.C.16.a.5. of the Personnel Manual states that “[s]ervice time while attending a Service Academy may not be counted in computing, for any purpose, the length of service of an officer.” COMDTINST M1900.4D states with regard to the net active service entry in block 12.c.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011428C070208

    Original file (20040011428C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 1 (Name [Last]), 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Service in the program for enlisted members who retain that status remains creditable under all provisions. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214, in item 12d will be corrected to show that he had no prior active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072637C070403

    Original file (2002072637C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to reflect his time as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy. The version in effect at the time, dated 1 July 1981, paragraph 1.4a(3) stated that a DD Form 214 would be prepared for each cadet of the U. S. Military Academy who fails to graduate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001489C070205

    Original file (20060001489C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve under the DEP on 16 May 1981 and was discharged on 8 September 1981, which is a period of 3 months and 23 days. Although there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of active duty service from 9 September 1981 to 30 June 1983, he should have been issued one. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001896

    Original file (20090001896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001896 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and his Officer Record Brief in support of his application. SERVICE NOT CREDITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE IN COMMISSIONED OFFICER STATUS" will be entered in item 18 of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017266

    Original file (20100017266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant completed two separate periods of active service -- 29 June 2000 through 13 October 2004 and 10 January 2005 through 21 July 2006. However her DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 July 2006 shows she entered active duty this period on 29 June 2000, which is the date she entered active duty on her prior period...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-123

    Original file (2012-123.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    § 182(b) and (c)(1), a cadet who does not complete the course of instruction at the Coast Guard Academy may be transferred to the Reserve and “order[ed] to active duty for such period of time as the Secretary prescribes (but not to exceed four years).” Summary of Past Actions Month Sept. 2007 July 2009 June 2010 Feb. 2012 Action Enlisted for 6 years of active duty Discharged (DD 214) and reenlisted for 2 years Discharged (DD 214) and appointed a cadet Disenrolled, discharged (DD 214),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01751

    Original file (BC-2011-01751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01751 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following blocks on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: 1. He appealed his dismissal on 12 February 2007 and received his DD Form 214 from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete...