SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF: .
BOARD DATE: 9 November 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015534
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in
proceedings dated 25 May 2006 were affirmed. The following additional
findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | |Analyst |
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated 25 May 2006.
| |Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Robert Rogers | |Member |
| |Ms. Ernestine I. Fields | |Member |
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C - Prior Record of Proceedings
Exhibit D – E-mail message from ARBA, St Louis dated 3 November 2006
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
8. On 3 November 2006 new information was received from the Army Review
Boards Agency Support Division, St Louis regarding the decision of the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number
AR20050010428, dated 25 May 2006.
9. The evidence submitted consists of the observation by the Army Review
Boards Agency Support Division, St Louis that the proceedings, as written,
did not indicate what disposition to make of the “Command/Gen Staff NR/EXT
1983” entry in item 14 of the applicant’s DD Form 214.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
3. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number
AR20050010428, dated 25 May 2006, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make
the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly
have been at the time.
4. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20050010428, failed to provide
a disposition for the “Command/Gen Staff NR/EXT 1983” entry in item 14 of
the applicant’s DD Form 214.
5. Any reference to completion of Command and General Staff College,
nonresident extension course in 1983 (Command/Gen Staff NR/EXT 1983) entry
should be deleted.
BOARD VOTE:
_MKP ___ __EF ___ __RR___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records set forth in Docket Number AR20050010428, dated 25 May 2006, to
change the BOARD DETERMINATION AND RECOMMEND to read, “The Board determined
that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for
relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by deleting any reference to completion of the
Command and General Staff College nonresident extension course in 1983 and
by showing completion of the Combined Arms and Services Staff School (CAS3)
4 week course in 1983.”
_ Margaret K. Patterson_____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060015534 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20061109 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |100.070 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002938C070206
Although the applicant indicates that originally there were 10 phases, documents in his file, including those authored by him, suggest that at the time he completed the course in October 1974 there were at least 9 phases. That same year a memorandum from the United States Army Command and General Staff College notes the applicant's enrollment in the correspondence course had been canceled because he failed to complete any credit hours for the RYE in June 1971. The applicant's retirement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009159C070205
He suggested the applicant apply again for the PDE and if not selected again, apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The Chief also advised the applicant in a later email the same day that the applicant was deleted from board consideration because an analyst could not find proof of a college degree in the applicant's official military personnel file. If he submitted a packet and was not considered he must also reapply for consideration by the next...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003187
A copy, dated 6 June 2006, of her graduate academic history, not an official transcript, from the university registrar showing she had completed 15 hours of graduate study during the period Fall 2005 through Spring 2006. c. A series of military orders: (1) Temporary Change of Station (TCS) Orders 06-100-00020, dated 10 April 2006, published by Headquarters, United States Army Reserve (USAR) Command deploying her to support Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) on 20 April 2006. A copy of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014256C071113
The applicant states, in effect, that the previously granted constructive credit for his military education was not sufficient for the promotion board and was entered into the personnel system as completion of the Command and General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC). The applicant requested the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) publish a specific and final decision granting him MLED-4 equivalent and/or constructive credit. The applicant had from the time of his promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009222
The memorandum also informed him that the records reviewed by the board did not indicate that he had completed the required military education by the day of the board. c. He submitted a memorandum on 9 February 2007 to the Army Correspondence Course Program requesting constructive credit for Phase I of the QM advanced course; however, there is no evidence that his request was approved. For MAJ boards, the military education requirement is completion of an officer advanced course or equivalent.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011363C070208
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 February 1987 be brought up to date. These items inlclude a Big Bend Community College Certificate of Progress; a Big Bend Community College Certificate of Course Completion; an M-A-N Service Training Course Certificate; two Army Achievement Medal Certificates, dated 30 June 1983 and 17 December 1986, respectively; a Certificate of Training for the Mountain...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009051
Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1992 correctly shows the number of AAMs he is entitled to. With respect to additional awards of the ARCOM, evidence of record shows orders awarded him two awards of the ARCOM and his DD Form 214 shows these awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * adding to additional awards of the AAM, ARCOM, and his appreciation and service certificates to his DD Form 214 * adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013080
The applicant also requests that this Board take into consideration that many other officers have been promoted to LTC without meeting the education requirements. Based on the above, he respectfully request that he be given a waiver for the education requirements and be considered for promotion to LTC. The applicant was not selected for promotion to LTC based on not meeting the required military education requirements by the board convening dates.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074427C070403
The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she was entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Her DD Form 214 shows that she completed 4 months and 27 days of active military service and that she was awarded MOS 91A as her primary MOS. The available evidence supports that the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct in that it shows she served in the RA in an active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010876
U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, memorandum, dated 22 November 1999, shows the Chief, Officer of Promotions, Reserve Components, informed the applicant a DA Reserve Components Selection Board was convened to consider officers in his grade for promotion to the rank/grade COL and he had been considered for promotion, but was not among those selected for promotion by the board. He also informed the applicant his records indicated he had completed 28 years of active status commissioned...