Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013510
Original file (20060013510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  20 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060013510 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Kathleen A. Newman

Chairperson

Mr. David K. Haasenritter

Member

Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B2O (Light Weapons Infantryman).

2.  The applicant states that he was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam for duty with a combat construction battalion.  His commander changed his MOS from 11B2O to 12B2O (Combat Construction Specialist).  Soon afterwards he was reassigned to an infantry unit and performed duty as an infantryman. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 9 July 1970.  The application submitted in this case is dated 
14 September 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 10 July 1968, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded MOS 11B2O (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  On 2 January 1969, the applicant was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam for duty with the 299th Engineer Battalion (Combat).

5.  On 14 March 1969, the applicant was promoted to specialist four, pay grade E4, in MOS 12B2O.

6.  Special Orders Number 77, 299th Engineer Battalion (Combat), dated 
18 March 1969, reclassified the applicant from primary MOS 11B2O to 12B2O.


7.  Special Orders Number 112, 299th Engineer Battalion (Combat), dated
22 April 1969, awarded the applicant a secondary MOS of 11B2O.

8.  On 14 May 1969, the applicant was reassigned to the 12th Infantry Regiment for duty in his secondary MOS as a rifleman.  He was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

9.  On 19 December 1969, the applicant returned to the United States for duty at Fort Hood, Texas, where he performed duty as a tank driver with the 66th Armored Regiment.

10.  On 9 July 1970, he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He had completed 2 years of active duty.

11.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) "12B2O Combat Construction Specialist."  

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at that time, provided, in pertinent part, that Item 23a of the DD Form 214 would be completed to  show  primary MOS code number and title. 
  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's last primary MOS was 12B2O, awarded to him at the time of his promotion to specialist four.   Item 23a of his DD Form 214 is in agreement; therefore, the applicant's request to change it should not be granted.

2.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 9 July 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
8 July 1973.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__DKH __  __LMD__  __KAN __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




___Kathleen A. Newman___
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060013510
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070327 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
 
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0500
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015378

    Original file (20080015378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available records. Evidence of record shows the applicant held MOS 05B and MOS 11B and served as a security guard in these MOSs while assigned to Advisory Team 32, MACV.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007503

    Original file (20090007503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 12B when he was released from active duty. The evidence shows that at the time the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he held MOS 62F. He was promoted in MOS 12B and on his release from active duty, he held this MOS as his primary MOS and MOS 62F as his secondary MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020325

    Original file (20100020325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as infantry in addition to his combat engineer MOS. Therefore, at the time his DD Form 214 was completed and issued, it correctly showed his primary MOS code number and title as "12B Combat Engineer." ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009775

    Original file (20090009775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 271, paragraph 38, United States Army Support Command, dated 27 September 1968, withdrew the applicant's primary MOS of 57A1O and awarded him primary MOS 94B2O, effective 13 September 1968. The evidence of record shows the applicant's primary MOS at the time of his release from active duty was 94B2O (Cook). In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012939

    Original file (20080012939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 19 January 1968 be corrected to show he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12B (Combat Engineer). Company C, 15th Engineer Battalion, Unit Order Number 2, dated 7 January 1967, shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 in MOS 12B2O effective 7 January 1967. The evidence of record shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750

    Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)." Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014188

    Original file (20090014188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090014188 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following: he was a United States citizen, his alien registration number was actually his naturalization certificate number, and his military occupational specialty was combat engineer and construction. As a result, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004770C071029

    Original file (20070004770C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and, in effect, also that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be amended to show he held primary military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The War Department received requests to award the CIB to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies. It is acknowledged that the applicant was awarded primary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007803

    Original file (20100007803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no records to show the applicant was awarded MOS 11B or any other infantry MOS. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Concerning award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence of record shows the applicant held MOS 62E and 62A.