Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012623
Original file (20060012623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  3 July 2997
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060012623 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  




	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:  

1.  The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities that were caused by his burns be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that he was badly burned when he was working with gasoline in Vietnam.  He sustained 1st and 2nd degree burns which were determined to have been incurred in line of duty.

3.  The applicant provides the denial of his request for CRSC, his separation document, and military medical records which show that on 15 April 1967 while in Vietnam, the applicant spilled gasoline and caught fire while burning trash.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.

2.  On 14 December 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) CRSC Branch denied the applicant’s request for CRSC.

3.  The Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals.  In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant appears to confuse line of duty determinations, and service connection for VA purposes, with CRSC eligibility.  These are not necessarily the same.  If they were the same, CRSC would be automatic for those military retirees with favorable line of duty investigations or VA disability pensions.  Service connection for VA purposes means the VA has determined that the disability was incurred or aggravated during military service.  CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship of the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

3.  As stated above, the fact that a disability was incurred in a theater of operations or during a training exercise is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant approval of CRSC.

4.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___ena__  ___eif___  ___swf___  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





__________Eric N. Andersen_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060012623
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070703
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
 DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005707C070206

    Original file (20050005707C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for his hand injury be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017982

    Original file (20110017982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017982 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests he be granted Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005183

    Original file (20080005183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. It is noted that the applicant's records were destroyed during the fire at the Records Center in St. Louis, however,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012960

    Original file (20100012960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show approval for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006308C070206

    Original file (20050006308C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. While a disability resulting from a military parachute jump would certainly be considered combat related, the applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate that his traumatic arthritis was caused by an injury incurred during a parachute jump. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s COPD and traumatic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001761C070205

    Original file (20060001761C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for lumbosacral or cervical strain be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disability to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018727

    Original file (20130018727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a (CRSC) provides that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation or are medical retirees and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. For periods before 1 January 2004, members had to have disabilities for which they were awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001574

    Original file (20090001574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his injuries were determined to have been incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014983

    Original file (20070014983.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that the Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003937

    Original file (20090003937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Without evidence to establish a direct,...