Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012429
Original file (20060012429.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  21 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060012429 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Marla J. N. Troup

Chairperson

Mr. John G. Heck 

Member

Mr. Donald L. Lewy

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) be amended to include time that he served at the United States Military Academy (USMA) as a cadet.

2.  The applicant states that while he served on active duty his PEBD was December 1993 and his time served at the USMA was not included in the calculation of his PEBD.  The applicant continued that he was enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) prior to attending the USMA as a cadet and therefore, his time at the USMA should be considered continued service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and a DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service-for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Arkansas Army National Guard (ARARNG) on 4 January 1990.  The applicant attended the USMA during the period 5 June 1991 through 2 June 1995.  The applicant was commissioned as an officer in the United States Army on 2 June 1995.

2.  Records show that while serving on active duty his PEBD was computed as 2 May 1994.  This PEBD shows that he received credit for the period of enlisted service prior to his attendance at the USMA.

3.  The applicant's records do not show that his PEBD was adjusted based on his attendance at the USMA.

4.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R Chapter 7 (Basic Pay) defines creditable service for determining a PEBD.  Chapter 1, paragraph D.4 of this regulation states that service as a cadet or midshipmen at a military academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member.  Table 1-1 of this regulations states that a member currently serving as an officer who has had service as a cadet or midshipmen in any of the military academies is entitled to creditable service if he concurrently retained a commission or warrant in the Army.  This table states that members who held no concurrent enlisted status and/or Reserve status or had an enlistment contract or period of obligated service that was not terminated were not entitled to creditable service for USMA attendance.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his PEBD should be adjusted to include service while attending the USMA was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.

2.  The applicant's PEBD shows that he received credit for the period of enlisted service prior to his attendance at the USMA.  There is no indication in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence showing that he maintained an enlisted status or concurrently retained a commissioned or warrant status while attending the USMA.

3.  In accordance with applicable regulation, the applicant's USMA service is not creditable service for calculating his PEBD.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MJNT_ _  _JGH____  _DLL__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





___Marla J. N. Troup__
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002906C071029

    Original file (20070002906C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that the time he served as a cadet at the USMA was not included as prior service on his retirement DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows, in Item 12 (Record of Service) that he completed a total of 20 years, 11 months and 23 days of active military service and that he had no prior active or inactive service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000912

    Original file (20130000912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his USMA separation and recoupment of education costs documents, ROTC enlistment and appointment documents, and active duty orders. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant: * was disenrolled from the USMA in November 2008 * enrolled in ROTC a year later (i.e., November 2009) * was commissioned in the VAARNG three years later (i.e., May 2012) * was ordered to FTNGD-OS duty in October 2012 b. c. The applicant's Reserve active duty service, beginning...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078008C070215

    Original file (2002078008C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In accordance with the DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 1, Table 1-5 service as a cadet or midshipman is creditable for basic pay purposes if you concurrently held an enlisted status in the Army on or after January 1, 1953. Other creditable service was added to the applicant’s record as basic pay.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01661

    Original file (BC-2002-01661.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, should the Board approve the relief sought, the record should be corrected to reflect a pay date of 17 Mar 87. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the following legal opinion is provided. Exhibit F. Letter, HQ USAF/JAG, dated 28 Feb 03.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006260

    Original file (20070006260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows she separated on 1 February 1990 with a characterization of service as under honorable conditions (general discharge) and the reason for her separation was Dropped from the Rolls (DFR). The applicant contends that her discharge should be changed to a medical discharge as the medical doctors at USMA found her medically unfit for continued service. Cadets of USMA are not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000257

    Original file (20070000257.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and the Hearing Advisor discussed exactly what would happen during the Preliminary Hearing, including procedural matters, evidence, and types of evidence submitted. On 10 July 2006, the USMA Superintendent approved the findings of the HIH that the applicant violated the Cadet Honor Code by cheating on or about 13 April 2006 and forwarded the records of proceedings to the Department of the Army recommending the applicant separation from the USMA, transfer to the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007373

    Original file (20150007373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * USMEPCOM (United States Military Entrance Processing Command) Orders 5034033, issued by Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), St. Louis, MO, on 3 February 2015 * an email from Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Indianapolis, IN, dated 18 March 2015, subject: Navy Service in Lieu of Debt * DFAS – Debt and Claims Account Statement, dated 29 December 2014 * DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479

    Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * transcripts from the USMA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075732C070403

    Original file (2002075732C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 8 April 1983, the Superintendent informed the applicant that, as a result of a hearing by an IO on 17 January 1983, he was found deficient in conduct for receiving 160 demerits for the period 1 June 1982 through 30 November 1982. The Board notes that the applicant's Officer Record Brief shows his BASD as 13 July 1983. The Board cannot determine from the available records if this is his correct PEBD (the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the USAR effective 22 July...