Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012280
Original file (20060012280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  1 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060012280 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Barbara J. Ellis

Chairperson

Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Member

Mr. Michael J. Flynn

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he was transferred from Okinawa to the Republic of Vietnam and was stationed there for several months. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 23 January 1972, the date of his release from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 15 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicantÂ’s failure to timely file.

3.   On 21 May 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 71H2O (Military Personnel Specialist)

4.   On 12 August 1970, the applicant was assigned for duty as a company clerk with the 3rd Battalion, 3rd Basic Combat Training Brigade, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri.

5.   On 12 February 1971, the applicant was enroute overseas for duty in the Republic of Korea.  On 15 March 1971, he was assigned duty as a clerk typist with Headquarters, Joint United States Military Assistance Group-Korea (JUSMAG-K).

6.   On 1 April 1971, the applicant's duty station was changed to Okinawa.

7.  On 19 January 1972, the applicant was returned to the United States and was subsequently released from active duty on 23 January 1972.  He had completed 1 year, 8 months and 3 days of creditable active duty and attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E4.

8.  Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was assigned to JUSMAG-K with duty in Okinawa.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he was overseas for 10 months and 
11 days.  Item 30 (Remarks) indicates that he did not have any service in the Republic of Vietnam.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.   The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to the JUSMAG-K for all of his overseas service.  Furthermore, it shows that his duty stations included Korea and Okinawa, but does not include any evidence that he served in the Republic of Vietnam.

2.   Therefore, based on the above, the applicant's request should not be granted.

3.   Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 23 January 1972; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
22 January 1975.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___LDS__  __BJE__  ___MJF__  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__      Barbara J. Ellis_____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060012280
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070201 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
  . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
120
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025145

    Original file (20110025145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for the period 1 - 30 April 1972 * a MAC Transportation Authorization, dated 24 May 1973 * temporary duty (TDY) orders, dated 22 May 1972, from Headquarters, 160th Signal Group * envelopes he used to send mail home from RVN * a portion of a letter to his parents CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of active service that was characterized as honorable. Based on his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013629

    Original file (20060013629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, on two separate applications, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), item 30 (Remarks) be corrected to show he was charged only once for excess leave. He also states that item 25 (Education and Training Completed), shows the entry "Korea (NCO Academy)." Because the ABCMR considers individual applications and decides cases on the evidence, and because it is not an investigative body, and because the ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011344

    Original file (20130011344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "V – 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001386

    Original file (20110001386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam area service in Thailand. The available evidence does not show he served in Vietnam or Thailand. _______ _ X___ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004901

    Original file (20130004901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Drill Sergeant Identification Badge is awarded upon successful completion of the Drill Sergeant Course and assignment as a drill sergeant to a training command. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of service for entitlement to the Korea Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 ending on 31 March 1998 the: * Drill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016890

    Original file (20090016890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was stationed with the 1st Special Forces Group in Okinawa and went on a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to Korea. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show he served outside of Okinawa and the period in which he served, there appears to be no basis to grant him additional awards at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AGCM to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004788

    Original file (20070004788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized to members of the Armed Forces who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in the Republic of Korea in direct support of military operations from 7 November 1971 through 6 December 1972. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007322

    Original file (20140007322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam service and the Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018799

    Original file (20110018799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Infantryman Badge * Combat Infantryman Badge (3rd Award) 2. Additionally, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he had satisfactorily held an infantry or special forces MOS...