Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011784
Original file (20060011784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  6 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011784 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Anderholm

Chairperson

Mr. Scott W. Faught

Member

Mr. Roland S. Venable

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 63B2O, and his last unit of assignment as the 227th General Supply Company.  He also indicates that his DD Form 214 is missing medals and ribbons.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his MOS and last unit of assignment are incorrect on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 11 September 2000, the date of his discharge.  The application submitted in this case is dated 9 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 20 April 1989, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded MOS 63B1O (Light Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).   He continued to serve through two reenlistments.

4.  On 1 December 1998, the applicant was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E5, in MOS 63B2O.

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 611-21 (Military Occupational Classification System) provides, in pertinent part, that the fourth character in an enlisted MOS code reflects the type and degree of skill representing the extent of qualification with the total MOS.  Under the Enlisted Personnel Management System (EPMS) it reflects the skills typically required for successful performance at the grade with which the skill level is associated.

6.  Orders 249-0020, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) Fort Campbell, Kentucky, dated 5 September 2000, reassigned the applicant from the 227th General Supply Company to the United States Army Transition Center, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, for processing out of the United States Army.

7.  On 11 September 2000, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct.  He was reduced to private, pay grade E1. 

8.  Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the 494th Transportation Company, Forces Command.

9.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his MOS as 63B1O (Light Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).

10.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214, lists the Army Good Conduct Medal (three awards), National Defense Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Noncommissioned Officers Professional Development Ribbon, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia, Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait, Air Assault Badge, and the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Mechanic Bar.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant's last unit of assignment was the 227th General Support Company.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit of assignment.

2.  The EPMS requires that the MOS skill level (fourth character) be in agreement with the individual's rank and pay grade.  His MOS was changed from 63B2O to 63B1O due to his reduction to private, E1.  Therefore, his request to change his MOS should not be granted.

3.   There is no available evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant, showing that he is entitled to any award not already included in Item 13 of his DD Form 214.   Therefore, his request for additional awards should not be granted.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 11 September 2000; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
10 September 2003.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence or argument, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__JEA __  __RSV__  __SWF __  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214, the 227th General Supply Company, Forces Command.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of his military occupational specialty and addition of awards to his DD Form 214.




__James E. Anderholm____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011784
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070306 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
 
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT 
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014239

    Original file (20080014239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 states, in pertinent part, that item 14 will list formal in-service training courses of 40 hours or more successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. It is awarded to members of Active Army, Army National Guard, and U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers for successful completion of designated NCO professional development courses. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to sergeant in July 2003 and was awarded primary MOS 63Y2O...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059751C070421

    Original file (2001059751C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Company A, 2nd Battalion, 12th Infantry; correction of item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show award of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) and six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM); and correction of item 18 (Remarks) to show his dates of service in Southwest...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009503

    Original file (20140009503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct amount of time for each military occupational specialty (MOS) listed. A calculation of the time the applicant held/served in each MOS of record shows the following: 1997 06 30 date retired from active duty - 1977 08 30 date awarded MOS 63B = 19 10 00 or 19 years and 10 months (MOS 63B) 1997 06 30 date retired from active duty - 1982 06 24 date awarded MOS 72E = 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011524

    Original file (20090011524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant submitted various documents, memoranda, and letters in support of his request as follows: a. copies of his DA Forms 2166-7 for the periods July 1991 through September 1991 showing he was assigned to the 22nd Support Command, Directorate of Engineering and Housing, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia; October 1991 through September 1992 showing he was assigned to the 9th Battalion, 227th Aviation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017835

    Original file (20140017835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders Number 070-17, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) on 10 March 2008, awarded HHC, 1st Battalion, 184th Infantry Regiment, the Valorous Unit Award for the period 15 January 2005 through 14 January 2006. His record does not contain and he has not provided any evidence or orders that show he was awarded any State awards as a member of the CAARNG. However, his record contains no evidence and he provides no evidence that shows he was promised promotion to, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007823

    Original file (20140007823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 June 2004 to show: * the Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars * his last unit of assignment as the 226th Engineer Company vice Engineer Company 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served on active duty from 17 January 2003 to 24 June 2004 and deployed to Kuwait/Iraq from 17 March to 9 July 2003. However, his record is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011122

    Original file (20120011122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) to show the major command as the 82nd Airborne Division vice Forces Command (FORSCOM) * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) and the Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars 2. His DD Form 214 shows in: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003638

    Original file (20090003638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was awarded and held MOS 11B. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he should have been or should now have his records corrected to show he was awarded MOS 11B. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request to award MOS 11B and the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007850

    Original file (20080007850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his military service records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The SF 189 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested his “total service record book including medical.” The NA Form 13045 shows that the applicant was informed the medical records he requested were lent to the Veterans Administration and referred the applicant to the VA claim number. The evidence of record shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023808

    Original file (20100023808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his foreign service in Korea and to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of service for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...