Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010303
Original file (20060010303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  28 June 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010303 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:  

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for post-operative stomach condition be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that he had about 75 percent of his stomach removed at the Seventh Day Adventist Hospital in Bangkok.  He then describes being wounded by shrapnel in his left index finger during World War II in Northern Africa and states that he was awarded the Purple Heart for that wound.

3.  The applicant provides his separation document which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart during World War II.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.

2.  In the processing of this case the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) CRSC Branch was contacted by the Board’s staff,  The USAPDA CRSC Branch stated that they approved the applicant for combat-related compensation for Disfigurement of Head, Face or Neck (7800) at 0% as Purple Heart eligible, and Condition of the Skeletal System (5299) at 0% as Purple Heart eligible.  They denied the applicant combat-related compensation for Postoperative Stomach Injury (7308) at 20% for "lack of evidence to support claim".  

3.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant has stated that he had 75 percent of his stomach removed at the Seventh Day Adventist Hospital in Bangkok.  However, he does not state that the operation was due to a wound or injury that was combat related.  As stated above, the fact that a disability was incurred in a theater of operations or during a training exercise is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant approval of CRSC.

3.  The applicant’s Purple Heart for shrapnel to his finger has no bearing on whether his post-operative stomach condition is combat related.

4.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jtm___  ____dac_  ___wfc__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





__________John T. Meixell_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010303
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070628
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003622C070206

    Original file (20050003622C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, the applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), and that the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch be investigated. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and a VA rating decision which shows that he was rated zero percent disabled by the VA for post operative rectal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007592C070206

    Original file (20050007592C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010127

    Original file (20060010127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for loss of index finger be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disability to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012240

    Original file (20060012240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for impaired hearing and loss of motion of his middle finger be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant has not submitted any evidence which shows that his VA rated disability for hearing loss is combat related for CRSC purposes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008399C070206

    Original file (20050008399C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 1 March 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s neurotic stomach disorder was not combat related and denied his request for CRSC. Even if the applicant were to submit evidence to show that he experienced stomach problems while in Vietnam, he would still have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015325

    Original file (20100015325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) determination be corrected to show he is eligible for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for his arteriosclerotic heart disease. The guidance states that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014983

    Original file (20070014983.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that the Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003507C070206

    Original file (20050003507C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Leonard G. Hassell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 20 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s loss of motion of two fingers and traumatic arthritis were not combat related and denied his request for CRSC. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003005C070206

    Original file (20050003005C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. However, medical records must establish that a military retiree was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003546C070206

    Original file (20050003546C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, the applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.