RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 21 December 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060006335
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Beverly A. Young | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Peter Fisher | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Thomas Ray | |Member |
| |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his narrative reason for discharge be
changed from Personality Disorder to Schizophrenia, Paranoia in item 28
(Narrative Reason) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty).
2. The applicant states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)
granted him service connection for schizophrenia, paranoid type with 70
percent disability rating. He states that an appeal is pending for 100
percent [disability rating].
3. The applicant indicated on his application that he had provided a DVA
Rating Decision; however, this document is not available.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 2001. He
completed the required training and was awarded military occupational
specialty 19K (M1 Abrams Armor Crewman). He was assigned to Germany in
December 2001.
2. He was promoted to private first class on 12 July 2002.
3. The applicant underwent a mental status evaluation on 4 December 2002
and was diagnosed by a military psychiatrist with having schizotypal
personality disorder. The psychiatrist indicated that this condition was
not amenable to hospitalization, treatment, transfer, disciplinary action,
training, or reclassification to another type of duty within the military.
The psychiatrist also indicated that this condition was present prior to
the applicant’s enlistment and was a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern
of behavior and thought process that interfered with the applicant’s
ability to perform his duty. He recommended the applicant be separated
from the U.S. Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
paragraph 5-13.
4. On 21 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of
pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
paragraph
5-13, for personality disorder. The applicant was advised of his rights.
5. The applicant acknowledged notification of separation action on 21
December 2002. He consulted with legal counsel and did not submit
statements in his own behalf.
6. On 25 December 2002, the separation authority approved the separation
action with issuance of an honorable discharge.
7. The applicant was discharged on 17 January 2003 under the provisions of
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 for personality disorder with an
honorable discharge. He served 1 year, 6 months, and 5 days total active
military service.
8. Block 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 shows his separation code
as “JFX” (Personality Disorder).
9. Block 28 on his DD Form 214 shows the narrative reason as “PERSONALITY
DISORDER.”
10. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribed the specific
authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for
the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes
to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation, in effect at the
time, showed that the SPD code “JFX” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form
214 specified the narrative reason for separation as involuntary release or
transfer for “Personality Disorder” and that the authority for separation
under this separation program designator was “AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-13."
11. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier
may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability
under Army Regulation 635-40 that interferes with assignment to or
performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition be a
deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that
interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's administrative discharge proceedings under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 were conducted in
accordance with law and regulations applicable at that time.
2. The applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects he was separated with a
separation code of "JFX" for Personality Disorder in accordance with the
governing regulation in effect at the time.
3. The applicant’s contention that the DVA granted him service connection
for schizophrenia, paranoid type with 70 percent disability rating and a
100 percent disability rating was pending is acknowledged. However, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed he was examined by
competent military medical personnel who made a valid determination that he
had a personality disorder at the time of his separation.
4. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the
evidence of record that the narrative reason given to him was in error or
unjust.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
PF______ TR______ JR______ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
Peter Fisher__________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060006335 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20061221 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |20030117 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR635-200, paragraph 5-13 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |Personality Disorder |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Chun |
|ISSUES 1. |110.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010996
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is acknowledged that the DVA has diagnosed the applicant with a major depressive disorder, rather than personality disorder, and has granted him a 50 percent disability rating due to this condition. In the applicant's case, a military psychiatrist diagnosed him with a personality disorder.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015745
The psychologist opined she met the criteria for Personality Disorder with Schizoid and Paranoid features; therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 625-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) her unit should consider an administrative separation under chapter 5-13, as it was likely she would continue to present with emotional and behavioral difficulties that reflect a long-standing pattern of difficulties. The psychologist opined she met the criteria for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005412
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 16 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of pending separation action under the provisions of chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) by reason of a personality disorder. The applicant contends he was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011727
On 08 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed by a medically qualified psychiatrist as suffering from a long standiing disorder of character and behavior, which is of such severity as to interfere with his being able to adequately serve in the U.S. Army. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014208
The applicant states, in effect, the reason for his separation is incorrect and his discharge has been classified as service connected because of an adjustment disorder by the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). The examining psychiatrist strongly recommended that the applicant be separated expeditiously because he met the criteria in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-13, administrative separation for personality disorder. On 29 January 2007, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017732C070206
The unit commander notified the applicant of pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 for personality disorder, date unknown. On 3 November 2004, the unit commander recommended that the applicant be separated from the U.S. Army for an Adjustment Disorder and receive an honorable discharge. On 11 November 2004, the applicant acknowledged that he had been advised by his consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011113
Records show the applicant was counseled on 20 August 2004 for his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13, for personality disorder. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired, and states that separation for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008154
The applicant finally states, in effect, that she really didnt pay attention to what was put on her separation papers (DD Form 214), as long as it said honorable and when she could be discharged. The separation authority approved the applicants separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 due to a personality disorder, and directed that the applicant receive an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms, in Item...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010473
The applicant states, in effect, that he was separated from the Army against his will for mental reasons, and that he has subsequently proved this reason for discharge was inaccurate. The Staff Psychiatrist diagnosed the applicant with a personality disorder, not otherwise specified (paranoid cluster) and recommended the applicant be separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), by reason...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016413
He further stated that it was unlikely that any rehabilitative measures would make the applicant an effective Soldier and he recommended the applicant's prompt administrative separation in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), based on her personality disorder. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms she was honorably separated on 15 June 2005 in the rank of PFC/E-3 under the provisions of...