Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010996
Original file (20080010996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	        30 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010996 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a medical retirement and that his narrative reason for separation be changed to "Major Depressive Disorder." 

2.  The applicant states that the diagnosis of personality disorder was incorrect and that he should have been given a medical retirement.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted on 4 November 1992 and trained as a multichannel transport operator/maintenance.  He remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments. 

2.  On 27 April 2007, the applicant was admitted to the hospital for anxiety.  On 30 April 2007, he was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety occupational problem, a dependent personality disorder, and essential hand tremor by a psychiatrist.  The psychiatrist found that the applicant met the medical retention standards in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3, that there was no psychiatric disease or defect on Axis I (adjustment disorder with anxiety occupational problem) which warranted disposition by a Medical Evaluation Board, and that the applicant was not fit for duty and should be separated administratively.    
3.  The psychiatrist also found that Axis II personality disorder diagnosis represented a character and behavior disorder within the meaning of Army Regulation 40-501; Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13; the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Edition); and the ICD-9 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, 9th Edition).  He indicated that this condition was a deeply ingrained, lifelong, maladaptive pattern of long duration which interfered with the applicant's ability to perform adequately.  This disorder was so severe that the applicant's ability to perform effectively in a military environment was significantly impaired.  The psychiatrist recommended that the applicant be separated in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13 as expeditiously as possible.   

4.  Discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder were initiated on 12 June 2007.  On 
12 June 2007, the applicant consulted with counsel, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving an honorable discharge, acknowledged that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge under honorable conditions was issued to him, and he elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf.  On 14 June 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that the applicant be furnished an honorable discharge.   

5.  On 2 July 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder.  He had served a total of 14 years, 7 months, and 29 days of creditable active service.

6.  Item 25 on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry, "AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, PARA [paragraph] 5-13.”  Item 26 on his DD Form 214 shows the entry, "JFX."  Item 28 on his DD Form 214 shows the entry, "PERSONALITY DISORDER.”

7.  The applicant provided a DVA Rating Decision, dated 31 May 2008, which shows that service connection was granted for major depressive disorder (also claimed as depression/anxiety with memory loss and shaking nightmares) with an evaluation of 50 percent effective 3 July 2007.   

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier’s ability to perform duty.  The diagnosis of personality disorder must have been established by a psychiatrist or doctoral-level clinical psychologist.  The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JFX is “Personality Disorder” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13.  

10.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) states that personality disorders render an individual administratively unfit rather than unfit because of physical illness or medical disability.  These conditions will be dealt with through administrative channels.

11.  Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The governing regulation states that personality disorders render an individual administratively unfit rather than unfit because of physical illness or medical disability.  

2.  It is acknowledged that the DVA has diagnosed the applicant with a major depressive disorder, rather than personality disorder, and has granted him a 50 percent disability rating due to this condition.

3.  However, the Army has an interest in promoting the reliability of its medical records.  Alteration of a diagnosis in those records after the fact may lead to fundamental questions about the veracity of the records in this case and in general.  For these reasons, it would not be proper to change the reason for the applicant's separation which would, in effect, alter a diagnosis in the applicant's medical records. 

4.  The Secretary's interest is in ensuring an orderly system in which a physician makes certain observations and diagnoses and recording them faithfully in the medical records at the time.  It would take an extraordinary showing to alter a diagnosis.  In the applicant's case, a military psychiatrist diagnosed him with a personality disorder.  That diagnosis was duly recorded in his medical records and, notwithstanding the DVA's diagnosis, he has not presented sufficient reason to alter the Army's diagnosis upon which his administrative separation was based.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary it is presumed that the applicant was diagnosed by competent military medical authorities as having a personality disorder. 

5.  The applicant’s narrative reason for separation was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of his separation.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____XX____  ___XX_____  ____XX____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _XXXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010996





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010996



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010456

    Original file (20080010456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010456 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 March 2008, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, for a physical condition, not a disability. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011628

    Original file (20060011628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011628 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Operating under different law and its own policies and regulations, the DVA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining medical unfitness for military service, awards ratings because a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016413

    Original file (20090016413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated that it was unlikely that any rehabilitative measures would make the applicant an effective Soldier and he recommended the applicant's prompt administrative separation in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), based on her personality disorder. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms she was honorably separated on 15 June 2005 in the rank of PFC/E-3 under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007086

    Original file (20130007086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 June 2007, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder and directed the applicant be issued an honorable discharge. e. [Applicant] reported on his application to correct his record he had been seen by the VA and diagnosed with PTSD, apparently soon after discharge. There is also no indication that, at the time of his discharge, he had a behavioral health condition for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017283

    Original file (20100017283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 states the narrative reason for separation for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 is "personality disorder." The applicant contends he should have been diagnosed with ADHD, and his discharge should have been based upon that condition, not the stated "personality disorder." The evidence of record in this case shows the applicant was evaluated by a psychiatrist who diagnosed him with an adjustment disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019360

    Original file (20090019360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's records to show he was medically discharged by reason of medical disability caused by his PTSD and that his disability be rated at 30 percent which would, in effect, allow for medical retirement. However, Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration) states that a Soldier who is diagnosed with PTSD should be referred to a medical evaluation board (MEBD) if the Soldier's medical fitness for return to duty is questionable, problematic, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008121

    Original file (20110008121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 October 2006, the applicant was counseled and was told she was being considered for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 5-13 (personality disorder), not amounting to disability. She was also told the following: * she was rehabilitatively transferred to the 2nd Platoon, 977th MP Company on 15 August 2006 * she was counseled on 26 August 2006 for taking her duty pistol into her barracks room * she was counseled on 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016775

    Original file (20090016775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was the opinion of this examiner that discharging the member from the Army in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), is in the best interests of both the individual and the Army. The separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, due to a personality disorder and directed that the applicant receive an honorable discharge. Evaluations revealed no current anxiety symptoms,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015881

    Original file (20140015881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was: * medically discharged under honorable conditions instead of discharged with an uncharacterized discharge by reason of personality disorder * discharged on 5 October 1989 instead of 26 September 1989 2. Because this mental status evaluation determined he was diagnosed with a personality disorder that affected his ability to function effectively in a military environment, his chain of command initiated separation action against...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016421

    Original file (20080016421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states that the applicant was discharged from the military on 31 October 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder. Counsel also argues that the Army incorrectly discharged the applicant for personality disorder and that the applicant should have been discharged for PTSD, that the applicant's medical records from 2006 support a discharge based on a diagnosis of PTSD not of...