Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005848
Original file (20060005848.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  9 January 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060005848 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Anderholm

Chairperson

Mr. Jerome L. Pionk

Member

Mr. Scott W. Faught

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he sustained injuries to his left ear and that he received the Purple Heart but he did not receive the certificate showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a Board of Veterans Appeals decision document which shows that he sustained a rupture of the left tympanic as a result of a shell blast.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20050004346, on 24 January 2006.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant provided a copy of a Board of Veterans Appeals decision document which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board.

4.  The Board of Veterans Appeals considered the applicant's request for award of service connected disability.  The Board of Veterans Appeals decision document shows that the entry "In September 1944, the concussion of a shell blast produced a rupture of the left tympanic membrane." 

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant sustained injuries as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the Board of Veterans Appeals decision document verifies his entitlement to award of the Purple Heart.

2.  Although the Board of Veterans Appeals decision document shows that the applicant sustained an injury to his left ear, there is no indication in that document which shows that the injuries were incurred as a result of hostile action.  Additionally, this document does not show that the applicant sought medical treatment for such injuries.  Therefore, this document is not a sufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart.

3.  As stated in the previous case, there is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.

4.  Absent evidence which shows that the applicant sustained injuries as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_JEA____  _JLP___  __SWF___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20050004346, dated 24 January 2006.




_James E. Anderholm_
          CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004623

    Original file (20090004623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The second page of a DD Form 2844 (Medical Record - Post-Deployment Medical Assessment) shows the applicant had retained shrapnel in his left hand. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant's service medical records show that the applicant received treatment for a right tympanic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007382

    Original file (20070007382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070007382 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence shows the applicant sought medical treatment for tinnitus (ringing) in his ears while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011848

    Original file (20130011848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 April 2013, his request was denied based on the medical documentation provided by the applicant that indicated his follow up examination for subjective hearing loss and tympanic membrane perforation following exposure to an IED attack was normal and without limitations. The fact that the applicant sustained a perforated eardrum while serving in Iraq is not disputed; however, the evidence provided by the applicant shows that on 1 December 2005, he sought treatment for ear pain and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609453aC070209

    Original file (9609453aC070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on documentary evidence in his file, the applicant should have been awarded the Purple Heart for combat related injuries suffered near Betzdorf, Germany on 25 June 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055809C070420

    Original file (2001055809C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action by a Japanese mortar shell on Okinawa on 26 May 1945 and was not awarded a Purple Heart. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 26 May 1945 while serving as an infantryman in Okinawa and that he was treated by medical personnel. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024667

    Original file (20100024667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the Purple Heart (PH) for frozen feet or trench foot that he received during the Battle of the Bulge in Belgium in December 1944. The applicant returned to duty and was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 16 May 1945. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017465

    Original file (20100017465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During Vietnam, the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for injuries received on 18 November 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023771

    Original file (20110023771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of his father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart and correcting his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show his wounds/injuries. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was injured in action against enemy forces in June 1945 and was treated at the 127th General Hospital in Nancy, France from 16 June to 3 July 1945 for a ruptured tympanic membrane of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005903

    Original file (20110005903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart 2. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the following awards to the list of awards in item 33 of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55: * Purple Heart * European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with three bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081051C070215

    Original file (2002081051C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.