Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005802C070205
Original file (20060005802C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        5 December 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060005802


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr.        |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Donald W. Steenfott           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his medical records be
corrected to show that he suffered from mental illness while in the
service.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that a Captain N____ thought that the
applicant’s behavior indicated mental disturbance in the form of “bipolar
activity, PTSD, mental hygiene suggesting hypochondria [and] a psychotic
disorder.”  He also states that he was attacked by three armed men and
received several blows to the temporal areas which suggests that dementia
due to head trauma was the cause of his chronic adjustment disorder and
psychosis.

3.  The applicant provides a handwritten description of how he believes the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) should have rated his alleged
conditions, a 20 March 2006 letter from the VA, and other correspondence
and documents concerning his appeals to the VA.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 29 July 1976, the date of the discharge.  The application
submitted in this case is dated 12 April 2005, but it was received on 25
April 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 27 June 1974.  He was
advanced to pay grade E-3 in August 1975.  After several instances of
misconduct, including nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code
of Military Justice and negative counseling statements, he was processed
and approved for elimination.  He was separated with an under honorable
conditions discharge on 29 July 1976.
4.  On 10 November 1980 the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the
discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions, but did not
change the reason or authority.

5.  There are no service medical records associated with the available
records.  Among the documents submitted by the applicant and to which he
apparently refers is a 3 June 1978 consultation referral to Mental Hygiene
which states that the applicant had over 20 visits to the outpatient clinic
in the past 2 months.  He had missed clinic appointments, but had recently
been evaluated for chest pain with an electrocardiogram, chest x-ray, and
“etc.”  The referring physician asked that the applicant be evaluated on a
routine basis for hypochondriasis.

6.  The MedLine Plus medical dictionary defines hypochondriasis as extreme
depression of mind or spirits often centered on imaginary physical
ailments.  MedLine Plus is an online medical reference service provided as
a joint venture by the United States National Library of Medicine and the
National Institutes of Health.

7.  Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to
award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or
aggravated by active military service. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no convincing evidence that the applicant suffered from any
mental illness or psychotic condition.  The mere referral to evaluate the
applicant for hypochondria does not indicate that he had a psychotic
disorder or any other mental illness.

2.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards
compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that
said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial
adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two
concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not
considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of
processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to
qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that
agency.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 29 July 1976; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 28 July 1979.   The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lds______  _phm_  __dws ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _       Linda D. Simmons____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060005802                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061205                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |145.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090390C070212

    Original file (2003090390C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of that formal LOD investigation, a statement was obtained from the physician who had made the entry that the applicant had stated she had been taking anti-psychotic medications prior to AT. As the illness progresses, psychotic symptoms develop: The preponderance of evidence supports a finding that the applicant’s schizophrenia existed prior to her entry on active duty during her AT, and there is no evidence of any event which may have aggravated that condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009839

    Original file (20070009839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in pertinent part, that medical evidence supports a discharge characterization upgrade. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) the applicant was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged and his characterization of service was under other than honorable conditions. The second psychiatrist states, it is his professional opinion that the applicant should have been honorably discharged under medical conditions so as to be eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008335C070205

    Original file (20060008335C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In the letter from the applicant’s wife, she stated that the applicant did not have hypertension before he went into the Army and opines that his hypertension is due to his experiences in Vietnam. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003954C070206

    Original file (20050003954C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He has been treated for mental problems by the VA since 1995. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003185

    Original file (20150003185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states: * the applicant had several serious medical conditions that, under the governing regulations, should have rendered him unfit and medically retired due to, but not limited to, PTSD and major depressive disorder with psychotic features * the governing regulations, Army Regulation (AR) 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) and AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), rebut the presumption of regularity * the applicant had much more than a mere...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082411C070215

    Original file (2002082411C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be given incapacitation pay for the period 9 October 1992 to 18 March 1996. APPLICANT STATES : That he is entitled to incapacitation pay from the date of the inception of his disabling mental condition while he was on active duty in 1990, to the date he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086462C070212

    Original file (2003086462C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 July 2002 the applicant requested that the Army Discharge Review Board change the reason for his discharge from personality disorder to physical disability retirement or separation, citing the evidence contained in the above mentioned psychologist's evaluation report and the Department of Veterans Affairs disability rating. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated. Consequently, due to the two concepts...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00529

    Original file (PD2010-00529.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the seven months since the previous C&P exam, the CI had been hospitalized once for command hallucinations and suicidal ideation. Subsequent VA records indicate the CI was hospitalized at least four more times in 2006-2008 with hallucinations and suicidal ideation, with GAFs ranging from 20 to 58. The Board determined, therefore, that none of the stated conditions were subject to Service disability rating.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00080

    Original file (BC-2005-00080.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and states based on the preponderance of evidence of the record and accepted medical principles, the reviewer concurs with the findings and recommendations of the IPEB. He now requests change of records to show "medical separation" not further specified contending his condition did not exist prior to entering...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510555C070209

    Original file (9510555C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be corrected to a medical discharge. In that recommendation his commander stated that the applicant had been counseled on five occasions between 10 February and 17 May 1977 for insubordination, appearance, negative attitude towards the Army, AWOL, poor duty performance, and shirking. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.