RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 December 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005430
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Allen Raub | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Frank Jones | |Member |
| |Mr. Qawiy Sabree | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the typographical errors
contained on his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the correct
information.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 contains
typographical errors that have created a problem with his government
employment because his entitlement regarding his military service cannot be
accurately determined. He goes on to state that item 3 (Social Security
Number (SSN)) has a typographical error, that item 11a (Type of Transfer or
Discharge) has a typographical error, item 11d (Effective Date) has a
typographical error, item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve Obligation) has a
typographical error, item 17b (Term of Service) is incorrect, and item 22b
(Total Active Service) is incorrect.
3. The applicant provides a narrative explanation of his application, a
copy of his DD Form 214, and a letter from the Retirements and Benefits
Section of the Department of Agriculture explaining that he needs his DD
Form 214 corrected to properly document his military service.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 5 January 1972. The application submitted in this case is
dated 27 March 2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in
Wichita Falls, Texas, on 17 July 1971, for a period of 6 years. At the
time of his enlistment his SSN was documented as containing the numbers
1813 as the last four digits. He was ordered to initial active duty for
training (IADT) for a period of 20 weeks on 3 September 1971 and was
transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky to undergo his basic combat training
(BCT). He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, on 10
November 1971, to undergo his training as a supply clerk.
4. On 5 January 1972, he was honorably released from IADT and was returned
to his USAR unit in Texas. He had served 4 months of total active service.
5. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD contains several
typographical errors. His SSN contains a typo in the last four digits that
appear as “1818”, then “181X3” (with the second “8” X’d over), and should
properly be reflected as “1813.” In item 11a, a typographical error was
made in the State in which it reflected he was transferred to the State of
Illinois, which was subsequently X’d out and the entry “Texas” was
inserted. However, the “Illinois” entry still shows through the X’s. In
item 11d, under effective date, it reflects that he was REFRAD on 3 January
1972, which was X’d out and replaced with
a “5.”
6. In item 16, under Terminal Date of Reserve Obligation is the entry
3 September 1971.
7. In item 17b, under term of service, is the entry “6” years.
8. In item 22b, under Total Active Service, is the entry “6” years.
9. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority
for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The regulation, then in effect,
provides, in pertinent part, that typographical errors in words or
abbreviations only may be corrected by erasure and overtype. All other
corrections will be by retyping the form. That regulation also provides
that for personnel serving on active duty for training (ADT), item 17b will
be annotated with the entry “NA.”
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 contains numerous errors and unauthorized
overtypes that create confusion by anyone viewing that form. The
applicable regulation, then in effect, does not allow corrections to
numbers contained on that form. Therefore, it would be in the interest of
justice to correct that form to provide clarification of the data contained
on that form.
2. Accordingly, the applicant’s DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect
in item 3 that the last four digits of the applicant’s SSAN is “1813.”
3. In item 11a, the entry should reflect that he was released to the Army
Reserve of Texas.
4. In item 11d, the effective date should reflect that he was REFRAD on
5 January 1972.
5. In item 16, the Terminal Date of Reserve Obligation should reflect the
date of 17 July 1977. The applicant enlisted on 17 July 1971 for a period
of 6 years; therefore, his Reserve obligation expired on 16 July 1977.
Accordingly, the terminal date of Reserve obligation should be corrected to
reflect 16 July 1977.
6. In item 17b, the entry “6” years should be changed to reflect “NA.”
7. In item 22b, the entry “6” years should be changed to reflect “4”
months, which is the period of his service on IADT.
8. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 5 January 1972; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 4 January 1975. The applicant did not file within the
3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence it
would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in
this case.
BOARD VOTE:
__AR ___ ___FJ___ __QS ___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing:
a. in item 3 of his DD Form 214 dated 5 January 1972, that the last
four digits of his SSAN is 1813;
b. in item 11a, that he was transferred to the Army Reserve of
Texas;
c. in item 11d, that the effective date of his REFRAD is 5 January
1972;
d. in item 16, that the Terminal Date of Reserve Obligation is 16
July 1977;
e. in item 17b, that the entry “NA” be entered under term of service
instead of the 6 years that is currently reflected; and
f. in item 22b, that the entry “4” months under total active
service be entered instead of the 6 years that is currently reflected.
______ Allen Raub_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060005430 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20061212 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |19720105 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-200, CH 5, SEC VII |
|DISCHARGE REASON |REFRAD |
|BOARD DECISION |(GRANT) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |AR 15-185 |
|ISSUES |189/corr 214 |
|1.110.0000 | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006880
(h) Item 30: Enter "This abbreviated form issued to Army National Guard members per appendix A, this AR [Army Regulation]" on all abbreviated DD Forms 214 issued. Noncontinuous periods of active duty are summarized on separate DD Forms 214; therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to amend his existing DD Form 214 to include the second period of activation from 7 April 1968 to 11 April 1968. (d) Item 17a: "Other" block will be checked and enter "call Executive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003771
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) listed his last name as "Pxxxin." With respect to the last name, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his induction into the AUS the applicant listed his last name as "Pxxxin."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016898
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 8 November 1971 to show his date of entry as 2 February 1967 instead of 19 December 1967. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period shows he completed 3 years, 10 months, and 20 days of creditable active service during this enlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020107
Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Pittsburgh, PA, Special Orders Number 122, dated 22 June 1966, show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) for a period of 24 months on 22 June 1966. Records show the applicant was inducted into the AUS and entered active duty on 22 June 1966. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 11d of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated from active duty effective 21 June 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028283
The applicant states the separation date shown on his DD Form 214 contains a typographical error in the year and should show 11 April 1967, not 11 April 1965. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 12 April 1965. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct this item to show the applicant was separated from active duty on 11 April 1967.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008415
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * item 3 (Social Security Number (SSN)) * 11d (Effective Date) 2. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his REFRAD lists his SSN using the number "5" as the fifth digit, and lists his date of separation as 19 December 1969 in item 11d. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stipulated that the military qualification record and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009803
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry date listed in item 17c (Date of Entry) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he entered military service in August 1966 vice 10 June 1964, as is currently shown. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and entered active duty on 10 June 1966, and not 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003765
Records show he completed 7 months and 17 days of foreign service in USAREUR. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in: * Item 17c (Date of Entry) 17 September 1971 * Item 11d (Effective Date) of separation 16 November 1972 * Item 22b (Total Active Service) 1 year and 2 months * Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) 7 months and 17 days 5. During his period of active service he served in USAREUR from 29 March 1972 through 14 November 1972 for a period of 7 months and 17 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022164
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered active service on 27 November 1964 instead of 27 November 1965. His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 11d (Effective Date) the entry 26 November 1967 * item 16 the entry 26 November 1971 * item 17c the entry 27 November 1965 6. Based on the correction to the applicant's date of entry, his net service during the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060342C070421
The DD Form 214 item by item preparation instructions contained in the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation, in effect, indicated that the years, months, and days actually served on active duty would be entered in the net service this period and total active service blocks of the form. However, it does allow for an entry in the remarks block of the DD Form 214 when a member is separated under some special program that authorizes them to be credited with completing...