Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005349C070205
Original file (20060005349C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        5 December 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060005349


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick H. McGann Jr.         |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Donald W. Steenfott           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his herniated disc and heart attack be
approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that these disabilities were incurred under combat
training conditions.

3.  The applicant provides a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of
Medical Care, which shows that on 8 October 1991, he was treated for lower
back pain and a loss of feeling in his left leg.  The applicant reported at
that time that he had this pain since he had been hospitalized for the same
condition 7 months earlier.  The Standard Form 600 also records that the
applicant had been in the field for 2 weeks prior to him seeking medical
treatment.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment
of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for
combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for
a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by
the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are
those retirees who have
20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service
creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that
are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty,
training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of
war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least
10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute
was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been
awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are
rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially
hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an
instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must
have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of
the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to
the military retiree.

2.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy.  The


OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be
considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a
direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The SF 600 submitted by the applicant merely shows that he was treated
for lower back pain and a loss of feeling in his left leg, which he had
experienced for the 7 months after his hospitalized for the same condition.
 While the applicant may have just returned from field duty when he sought
medical treatment, there is no evidence or indication that an injury while
simulating war during his field duty caused either of his medical
conditions.  To the contrary, the applicant’s reported 7 month history of
the same pain clearly establishes that it existed prior to his field duty.

3.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the
applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is
insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___lds___  ____phm_  ___dws__  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            _________Linda D. Simmons_______
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060005349                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061205                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003523C070206

    Original file (20050003523C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for back strain be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013327

    Original file (20070013327.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Ms. Linda D. Simmons Chairperson Mr. David K. Haasenritter Member Mr. Edward E. Montgomery Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011044

    Original file (20110011044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incurring disabilities in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. In order to qualify for CRSC, the military retiree must show the disability met the established disability criteria and was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001574

    Original file (20090001574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his injuries were determined to have been incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009699

    Original file (20070009699.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant has not stated that a particular injury caused any of his VA rated disabilities. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship between the applicant’s VA rated disabilities and war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003158C070205

    Original file (20060003158C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Those medical records show that when the applicant was given a physical examination on 15 February 1968, he had pes planus; when he was treated for back pain on 5 July 1968 he reported that he fell down steps the day before; and a neurosurgical evaluation dated 13 July 1992 in which it was stated that the applicant injured his lower back 25 years ago while lifting a heavy object. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002005C070206

    Original file (20050002005C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for spinal disc disorder be considered as being incurred while simulating war and, as a result, that he be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012293

    Original file (20060012293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and excerpts from his military personnel and medical records. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017498

    Original file (20080017498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10 percent disabled or who are rated at least 60 percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001436C070205

    Original file (20060001436C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hypertension be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.