Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001436C070205
Original file (20060001436C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        24 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001436


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Jeanette R. McCants           |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Scott W. Faught               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Rowland C. Heflin             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
rated disability for hypertension be approved for Combat-Related Special
Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his medical records will show
that his hypertension is combat related.

3.  The applicant provides the partial denial of his request to reconsider
his CRSC application, excerpts from his military medical records, and an
operative report from a civilian physician.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The military medical records provided by the applicant show that he was
treated for hypertension and chest pain while on active duty.  These
medical records also show the treatment the applicant received for other,
unrelated symptoms.  The operative report from the civilian physician
describes his left total hip arthroplasty.

2.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment
of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for
combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for
a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by
the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are
those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or
20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who
have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially
hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by
an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA
and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the
date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which
they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled
or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war,
or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved
for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since
CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived
retired pay to the military retiree.

3.  On 19 January 2006, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
CRSC Branch approved the applicant for knee condition (two 30% ratings),
and limited flexion of knee (two 20% ratings), for a combined CRSC rating
of 80 percent.  However, the PDA CRSC Branch denied the applicant’s request
for CRSC for hypertension (10% rating).

4.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant has submitted abundant evidence to show that his
hypertension is service related.  However, he has not submitted any
evidence which would show that his hypertension is combat related.  As
stated above, the fact that a disability was incurred in a theater of
operations or during a training exercise is insufficient, in and of itself,
to warrant approval of CRSC.

3.  The applicant appears to confuse service connection for VA purposes
with CRSC eligibility.  These are not necessarily the same.  If they were
the same, CRSC would be automatic for those military retirees with VA
disability pensions.  Service connection for VA purposes means the VA has
determined that the disability was incurred or aggravated during military
service.  CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal
relationship to the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the
simulation of war.

4.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the
applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is
insufficient basis in which to grant his request.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





                                  ___________Jeanette R. McCants____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2006001436                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060824                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007745C070206

    Original file (20050007745C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and military medical records. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015325

    Original file (20100015325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) determination be corrected to show he is eligible for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for his arteriosclerotic heart disease. The guidance states that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011334C070206

    Original file (20050011334C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry J. Olson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hypertension be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s hypertension to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018831

    Original file (20080018831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Specifically, the VA determined the following conditions to be service-related but there is insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related: a. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002235

    Original file (20090002235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his leukemia was determined to have been incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war and that his disabilities are qualifying for award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004445C070205

    Original file (20060004445C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    David K. Haasenritter | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for essential hypertension be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). While the evidence of record conclusively shows that the applicant was a parachutist and was taken off parachute duty due to essential hypertension, these facts do not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011369C070206

    Original file (20050011369C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010813C070206

    Original file (20050010813C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for arteriosclerotic heart disease be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the partial denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application; his separation document; a statement from a military physician who states that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002876C070205

    Original file (20060002876C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009710C070206

    Original file (20050009710C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension. It was also stated that the applicant reinjured his elbow while in a tank. As for the applicant’s hypertension, as stated above,...