Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003565C070205
Original file (20060003565C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        11 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060003565


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. G. E. Vandenberg              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr.        |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. David R. Gallagher            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr.  Roland S. Venable            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a United States Coast Guard Unit
Commendation be added to his 6 January 2006 DD Form 215 (Correction to DD
Form 214).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, there is no error or injustice but he
would like to have the award added to his discharge document.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his 5 July 1968 DD Form 214 (Report of
Transfer or Discharge), a 6 January 2006 DD Form 215, and a 29 May 1999
Citation for Award of the Coast Guard Unit Commendation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 29 May 1999, the date of his award.  The application
submitted in this case is dated 1 March 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The records show the applicant entered active duty in the United States
Army on 8 July 1965.  He served honorably and was released from active duty
on 5 July 1968.

4.  His awards as listed on the DD Form 214 are the National Defense
Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, the
Combat Infantryman Badge, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with
Rifle and Machinegun bars.

5.  The applicant was awarded a Coast Guard Unit Commendation on 29 May
1999 for his service from June 1996 through June 1999.

6.  A 6 January 2006 DD Form 215 corrected the applicant's records to show
that in addition to the awards listed on his DD Form 214 he is also
authorized the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Meritorious Unit
Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor First Class Unit
Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
Badge, and to wear two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, stated
that only those awards or decorations authorized during the period covered
by the DD Form 214 will be included on that specific DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The inclusion of an award from the Coast Guard issued 31 years after
the DD Form 214 was issued is not appropriate as it does not reflect an
award earned or awarded during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

2.  Therefore, the applicant has established no basis for correcting his DD
Form 214 or his DD Form 215.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 29 May 1999; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 28 May 2002.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__PHM__  _DRG __  ___RSV__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  __Patrick H. McGann, Jr. ___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060003565                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061011                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |  . . . . .                             |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107                                     |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071496C070402

    Original file (2002071496C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 8 September 1969 shows the following entries in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): Republic of Vietnam Service Medal; National Defense Service Medal; and Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars. Evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Army as a member of the 9th Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075734C070403

    Original file (2002075734C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The 6 January 1999 Headquarters, USMC letter did not show that the applicant had been awarded a Silver Star or higher award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017944C070206

    Original file (20050017944C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (Army), the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Bronze Star Medal, the Combat Action Ribbon, the Navy Unit Commendation, the Presidential Unit Citation (Navy), and the Joint Service Commendation Medal. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); his letter to the Awards Branch; a citation for the Navy Unit Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006739C070206

    Original file (20050006739C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal, the 1960 Device to be affixed to the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, a second award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, one individual award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017457C070206

    Original file (20050017457C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, as issued on 31 January 1987 listed his awards as the Silver Star, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal (6th award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Parachutist Badge, the Aircraft Crewman Badge, the Air Assault Badge, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. His DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003738C070205

    Original file (20060003738C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was awarded two Purple Hearts. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on or about 26 March 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006414C070205

    Original file (20060006414C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and all other awards to which he is entitled. He also requests correction his DD Form 214 to show his rank as specialist five (SP5), E-5. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001633

    Original file (20110001633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * NAVPERS (Navy Personnel) 1650/65 (Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards) * Diploma of completion of the Infantry NCO Candidate Course * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Special Orders Number 306 (promotion to sergeant) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002024C070205

    Original file (20060002024C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), of the applicant's DA Form 20, showing that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Combat Action Ribbon. As a member of the United States Army, the applicant is not eligible for award of the Combat Action Ribbon. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001726C070205

    Original file (20060001726C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 24 (Decorations and Awards), of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 fails to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and given that he was awarded this award, it was apparent that he had served in a unit that was subordinate to USARV.