RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 October 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003345
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Dean L. Turnbull | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Patrick H. McGann | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. David R. Gallagher | |Member |
| |Mr. Roland S. Venable | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, to extend his enlistment in the Army
Reserve beyond age 60.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his request to extend his
enlistment for
1 year, 10 months, and 1 day will extend his enlistment beyond his 60th
birthday. He states that this will allow him to attain 20 years of military
service required for retired pay and benefits. He states that the United
States Army Reserve (USAR) had denied his request for extension. He also
states that USAR made its decision based on incorrect retirement point data
which is now corrected, and that a statement from the Army National Guard
enlistment stipulation which states "…understand that he will not be able
to retire at age 60 unless a waiver is granted at the time IAW then current
regulations." He further states that he had been told that an enlistment
extension beyond age 60 is not uncommon and would most likely be granted
provided he is still capable of adequate performance as a Soldier.
3. The applicant provides:
a. a copy of his Chronological statement of retirement points;
b. a copy of DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record);
c. a copy of DA Form 2A (USAR) (Personnel Qualification Record-
Enlisted);
d. a copy of discharge order from USAR, dated 3 February 2006;
e. a copy of military service summary; and
f. a copy of his current Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report
(NCOER).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 9 February 2006, the date of his discharge from the
(USAR). The application submitted in this case is dated 20 February 2006.
2. The applicant's military summary shows that he was inducted in 1965.
He trained as a Combat Engineer and served as an Infantryman with the 7th
Infantry Division in Korea. He was honorably released from active duty in
1966. He served with the California Army National Guard during the period
1988 to 1991. In 1991, he entered the USAR.
3. On 1 May 2005, the applicant's records show that he requested to extend
his enlistment past maximum age (age 60). His chain of command recommended
approval of that request. However, on 26 August 2005, his request was
disapproved by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis. Noted in
the disapproval was the fact that the applicant would reach his 60th
birthday on
6 March 2006 and that the applicant would only have 16 years, 11 months,
and
12 days of qualifying service by retirement year ending 29 November 2005.
Also noted was the fact that the applicant would require retention until
age 63 to qualify for retired pay.
4. A chronological statement of retirement points, dated 13 February 2006,
from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis shows that the
applicant's total qualifying years for retired pay as 17 years, 11 months,
and 12 days.
5. Section IV (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 1966/4 (Record of
military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States), signed when he
enlisted in the California Army National Guard in 1988, shows that the
applicant did in fact sign a statement with the understanding that he will
not be able to retire at age
60 unless a waiver was granted at the time in accordance with then current
regulations.
6. On 28 February 2006, the applicant was honorably discharged from the
USAR.
7. Table 4-1 (Waivable reenlistment disqualifications and approval
authorities) Rule A of Army Regulation 140-111 (Reserve Components
Personnel-Update 19), states that Age 55 or older and currently not
eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 but can complete 20 qualifying
years of service for retired pay by age
60 may qualify for a waiver. The intent of the waiver requirement is to
ensure that only those personnel who can qualify for retired pay at age 60
are retained in the Ready Reserve. Personnel who cannot qualify for
retired pay by age 60 will not be processed for reenlistment or extension.
8. Table 4-2 (Nonwaivable moral and administrative disqualifications) Rule
F of Army Regulation 140-111, states, in pertinent part, that personnel who
are unable to complete 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay by
age 60 must submit a request for a waiver to be retained beyond age 60 to
the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis. The U.S. Army Human
Resources Command-St. Louis must determine that there is an implied or
actual moral obligation incurred by the USAR to grant a waiver to permit
the member to remain in the Ready Reserve beyond age 60 to qualify for
retired pay, based on long service in the USAR.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, to extend his enlistment in the Army
Reserve beyond age 60.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant did sign a statement
which clearly states that he understood he would not be able to retire at
age 60 unless a waiver was granted. The fact that there was an error in
the calculation of his retirement points has no bearing in this case. The
corrected retirement point summary still shows that the applicant cannot
complete 20 qualifying years of service before age 60.
3. Since the applicant was allowed to enlist in the Army National Guard
with the understanding that he could not qualify for retired pay, there is
no error or injustice for the Board to correct.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___phm _ ___drg __ ___rsv___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
__________Patrick H. McGann_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060003345 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20061011 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004162C080407
The applicant requests, in effect, that he receive credit for United States Army Reserve (USAR) service he performed after he reached age 60; and that his retirement pay be changed accordingly. This HRC retirement official further states that AMEDD officer MRD extension procedures are well known; however, it appears the applicant submitted his request to his chain of command in August 2005, which was just three months prior to his MRD and retirement date, and his request was processed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009671C071029
He concludes his request by stating, in effect, that he would appreciate the opportunity to continue to serve his country until he reaches the age of 62 and assist in alleviating the immediate and long term shortages of qualified CA officers in an active duty or reserve component environment. The Human Resources Specialist, Transition and Separation Branch, continued the opinion by stating that the applicant had been granted an extension to his mandatory removal date to 23 February 2008 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014995C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to his expiration of term of service (ETS) on 30 January 2005, or extension of his enlistment contract until his 60th birthday (11 February 2005). It would now be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his 2 February 2005 discharge from the USAR and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 29 January 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003463
The applicant requests, in effect, that her mother's records, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that she was eligible for non-regular Army retirement. The FSM's ARPC Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) shows that the FSM would have completed 20 years of creditable service on 24 June 2003, beyond her 60th birthday. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004062C070206
Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve- Qualifying Service for Retired Pay - Non Regular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (a) attained age 60; (b) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and, (c) served the last 8-years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Components Soldier. Applicable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009744
The ABCMR granted relief to the applicant by allowing him service credit from the date he was placed in the Retired Reserve until his reinstatement in the IRR. The applicant also requested compensation or relief for colonel promotion boards. If the applicant is selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board sufficiently early, his records should be submitted to a Special Selection Board for promotion consideration to colonel under the appropriate criteria. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013020
Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 21 years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60 at the time of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020947
The applicant requests, in effect, the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for non-regular retirement at age 60. On 24 August 1995, the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate). The evidence of record shows the FSM served in the ARNG and completed a total of 24 years, 10 months, and 2 days of service for retired pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008542
The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-regular retirement and that he be issued a 20-year letter. His discharge order from AR-PERCEN, St. Louis, shows reason as "Completed 20 or more Years Reserve Duty." In a 6 June 2006 letter from HRC-St. Louis, the applicant was informed that he was never issued a 20-year letter, only an order that incorrectly notified him that he had 20 years of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011865
The FSM's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 March 1969. The FSM's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points shows he completed only 6 years of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records pertaining to the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing for the FSM a notice of eligibility for retired pay at age 60; b. having the U. S. Army Human...