Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002588C070205
Original file (20060002588C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        26 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060002588


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Joyce Wright                  |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Marla J. N. Troup             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert Rogers                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. John G. Heck                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his enlistment contract be
corrected to show that the term of service he enlisted for be changed from
"indefinite" to "2 years and 00 weeks."

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his desire was to extend his
contract for 2 years and not to do an "indefinite" term, which he was led
to believe he had to do.  The retention NCO (noncommissioned) officer led
him to believe that an "indefinite" contract was his only option.  He
believed that the regulation, Army Regulation 140-111, chapter 2, page 21,
clearly states that a Soldier with at least 10 years and in pay grade E-6,
may reenlist indefinitely if he so desires.  At the time of his contract, 5
May 2005, he only had 8 years, 4 months, and 21 days of service; therefore,
he did not qualify, nor did he desire, to do an indefinite contract.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment
Document/Armed Forces of the United States), dated 5 May 2004, a copy of
his DA Form 2A (Enlisted Personnel Qualification Record), an extract of
Army Regulation 140-111, chapter 2, page 21, and e-mails exchanged by local
retention officials, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve
(USAR) on 14 December 1995.  He was ordered to active duty for training on
10 July 1996.  He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced
individual training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri.  On completion of his
advanced training, he was awarded the military occupational specialty
(MOS), 62B, Construction Equipment Repairer.  He was promoted to sergeant
first class (SFC/E-7) effective 1 June 2006.

2.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 2A, which shows his PEBD
(pay entry basic date) as 14 December 1995.

3.  DD Form 4/1, Section B (Agreements), shows that the applicant
reenlisted in the USAR for an indefinite period while he was in pay grade
of E-6.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of a series of e-mails that began on
26 January 2006 and terminated on 30 January 2006 which shows he attempted
to exhaust his administrative remedies through reenlistment channels within
his command regarding his indefinite enlistment contract.
5.  An advisory opinion was provided by the Army Reserve G-1, Headquarters,
United States Army Reserve Command (USARC), on 28 September 2006.  The
opinion states that the applicant enlisted for an indefinite term of
enlistment on 5 May 2004.  It states that the applicant believed this was
his only option and did not know that he did not meet the regulatory
requirements for an indefinite reenlistment.  He requests that the
indefinite contract be voided and he be allowed to extend his current
contract for 2 years.

6.  The opinion states that the applicant was correct when he stated that
he did not meet the regulatory requirements for an indefinite reenlistment.
 At the time he contracted for an indefinite reenlistment, the applicant
had 8 years of service. In accordance with Army Regulation 140-111, Table 3-
1, Rule A, a Soldier may extend for up to 12 months for any reason,
provided the Soldier is qualified for reenlistment.  Although the applicant
desired to extend his current contract for 2 years, further extensions
under this rule, after a 1-year extension of his contract is not
authorized.  The minimum length of service for which a Soldier may reenlist
under these circumstances is 3 years.

7.  The G-1 recommended that the length of service in the applicant’s
contract be corrected to reflect a reenlistment of 3 years and
entitlement to receive any incentive for which he was eligible had he
been allowed to reenlist for 3 years on 5 May 2004.

8. The applicant was provided a copy of the favorable opinion for his
acknowledgement and possible comment prior to consideration of this case.
 The applicant concurred on 11 October 2006.

9.  Army Regulation 140-111 governs the immediate reenlistment or extension
of current members of the USAR assigned to the Selected Reserve, the
Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), and the Standby Reserve, and personnel
serving on active duty in the AGR (Active Guard Reserve) Program.  Chapter
2, paragraph 2-4 pertains to the Indefinite Reenlistment Program.  It
states that the Secretary of the Army may accept USAR Soldiers for an
unspecified or indefinite term of service.  All USAR enlisted Soldiers are
required to enlist for an indefinite term unless exempted elsewhere in the
regulation or other regulations.  The eligibility criteria is as follows:
"TPU (troop program unit), IMA (Individual Mobilization Augmentation), and
IRR (Individual Ready Reserve) Soldiers in the grades of
SSG (staff sergeant) through CSM (Command Sergeant Major) eligible to
reenlist in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and who have at
least 10 years of total military service at the end of their current
enlistment may reenlist (but not extend) for an unspecified period of time.
 Reenlistment may be permitted for a specified period of time for
humanitarian reasons or while pending other ongoing personnel actions."

10.  Table 3, Rule A, in this same regulation, states that a Soldier may
extend for up to 12 months for any reason, provided the Soldier is
qualified for reenlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant reenlisted for an
indefinite period on 5 May 2004, while serving in pay grade E-6.  However,
his desire was to extend his current contract for 2 years and not to do an
"indefinite" term, which he was led to believe he had to do.  According to
regulation, a Soldier with at least 10 years, who is in pay grade E-6, may
reenlist indefinitely if he so desires.  At the time of the applicant's
contract, he had less than 10 years of service and did not desire to do an
indefinite contract.

2.  USARC Officials opined that the applicant was correct when he stated he
did not meet the regulatory requirements for an indefinite reenlistment.
He was eligible at the time of his enlistment on 5 May 2004, to extend his
contract for 12 months, for any reason, provided he was qualified for
reenlistment.  The applicant only desired to extend his current contract
for 2 years.  Further extensions after a first extension are not
authorized.  The minimum length of service for a reenlistment is 3 years.
The applicable regulation only allows one extension and for a maximum of 12
months.

3.  The opinion recommended that the applicant's contract be corrected to
reflect a reenlistment of 3 years, with entitlement to receive any
incentive for which he was eligible, had he been allowed to reenlist for
3 years on 5 May 2004.  The applicant concurred with the opinion and it
would, therefore, be unjust and inequitable to deny the applicant the
relief he has agreed to by his concurrence of the advisory opinion.
Therefore, his DD Form 4, Section 8, should be corrected to reflect his
term of service as "3 years and 00 weeks."






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

__RR ___  ___T ___  ___JGH _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected
by:  amending the applicant's reenlistment contract (DD Form 4/1),
Section B (Agreements), dated 5 May 2004, to show that he reenlisted in
the USAR for 3 years and 00 weeks, instead of for an unspecified
"indefinite years," that is now shown on his reenlistment documents.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
the applicant's request to correct his enlistment contract to show he
enlisted for 2 years and 00 weeks.




                                  _____Marla J. N. Troup_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060002588                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061026                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . USAR ON AD                         |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |100                                     |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012620

    Original file (20070012620.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 9 November 2007, obtained in the processing of this case, the Director, Army Reserve Active Duty Management Directorate, cited Rule P, table 3-8, Army Regulation 140-111 and recommended approval of the applicant's request to have his reenlistment contract, dated 26 June 2005, voided. AR 140-111 governs USAR reenlistment and extension programs. Since the applicant's ETS date is 21 March 2008, it is also appropriate to authorize an antedated extension or a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005408

    Original file (20120005408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military record to void her enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 30 September 2004. On 30 September 2004, she reenlisted in the USAR and she was ordered to active duty in an AGR status for an indefinite period. The evidence of record confirms that after the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 7 January 2001 for a period of 6 years, she was subsequently ordered to active duty in an AGR status on 24 February 2001.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006220

    Original file (20050006220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Memorandum; Battalion Commander Memorandum of Support; DA Form 4836, dated 13 March 2003; Enlistment/Reenlistment Contract (DD Form 4, dated 18 May 1997; and Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A). Table 2-3 outlines the authorized periods of reenlistment for USAR TPU Soldiers, and paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on the USAR Indefinite Reenlistment Program. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009286

    Original file (20100009286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reenlistment contract, dated 23 December 2003, be corrected to show his reenlistment was for 6 years and not indefinite. He also provided a copy of his 23 December 2003 reenlistment contract that indicates his reenlistment was for an indefinite period in a TPU. The opinion stated the applicant's indefinite reenlistment contract was done correctly and the Soldier initialed block 8 of the reenlistment contract and several other forms which all state the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016532C070206

    Original file (20050016532C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides two enlistment contracts, dated 12 April 1999 and 15 July 2004; an extract from Army Regulation 140-111; an email dated 19 July 2005; her AGR active duty orders; and reassignment orders dated 19 April 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by voiding her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021973

    Original file (20090021973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his last extension in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 11 January 2009 be cancelled and removed from his records. His career counselor submitted a sworn statement, dated 24 November 2009, wherein he states that the applicant's intent had been to reenlist for a period of 3 years and that he extended him for 4 months under Rule J because his unit required him to extend. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050007607

    Original file (20050007607.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel (MILPER) message 04-353 states Soldiers in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status can reenlist anytime during their contract period. The 26 January 2005 message the applicant referred to was not available; however, he contended MILPER message 04-353 stated Soldiers in an AGR status can reenlist anytime during their contract period and that there is no window. The applicant had over 17 years of total military service at the time of his 8 June 2004 reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007364

    Original file (20140007364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    With MYOS suspended during the mobilization, Removal Rule #2 was used to calculate the ETS date, which is age 60 for enlisted Soldiers thus giving an ETS date of 3 January 2021. e. When he discussed this with Master Sergeant Ixxxx at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), he became evasive and stated, "you apply the active duty rules to a mobilized reservist as stated in AR 140-111 (USAR Reenlistment Program), chapter 8." The orders show he was reenlisted and ordered to active duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001059C070205

    Original file (20060001059C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 February 2005, the applicant was administered a "for record APFT" in which he passed the push-ups and sit-ups and failed the 2-mile run and was not within body fat standards. The applicant was administered a for record APFT in which he passed the push-ups and sit-ups but was not within body fat standards and he failed the 2-mile run. The advisory opinion restates that the applicant's contention that he was not allowed due process in appealing his bar to reenlistment carries...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016747

    Original file (20080016747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In an exchange of email messages between the applicant, the applicant's commander, and his HRC-St. Louis personnel manager, the personnel manager questions the recommendation to disapprove the applicant's request for reenlistment, to which the commander states that he disapproved the exception to policy to reenlist in the AGR program and, as a commander, he is not required by regulation to state his reasons. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered the AGR program in May 1999...