Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021973
Original file (20090021973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021973 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his last extension in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 11 January 2009 be cancelled and removed from his records.  He also requests the issuance of an antedated DD Form 4 (Enlistment Reenlistment Document) for a period of 3 years effective on the original expiration of his term of service (ETS) date, 9 October 2009.

2.  The applicant states that he was informed by his unit that he had to execute a 4-month extension in the USAR in order to attend Duty Military Occupational Skill Qualification (DMOSQ) for military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist) to satisfy the time in service (TIS) requirements for his assignment to the 310th Expeditionary Sustainment Command (ESC).  However, he later found out that the TIS requirement had already been waived by the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) and that his extension in the USAR was unnecessary.  Had he not extended, he would have qualified for a reenlistment bonus based on a 3-year reenlistment. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or reenlistment), dated 11 January 2009; a copy of his DD Form 4, dated 10 January 2001; a copy of Orders 09-211-00001, issued by Headquarters, 88th Regional Support Command, Fort McCoy, WI, on 30 July 2009; a copy of a sworn statement, dated 24 November 2009, from his career counselor; and a copy of the USARC Memorandum, dated 8 December 2004, in support of his request.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR for a period of 8 years under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 10 October 2001.  He was discharged from the DEP on 7 November 2001 and he subsequently enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 8 November 2001.  He held MOS 94E (Radio and Communications Security Repairer).

2.  He was honorably released from active duty on 31 October 2007 and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) for completion of his Reserve obligation.

3.  On 11 January 2009, he executed a 4-month extension of his initial 8-year USAR enlistment, under Rule J, Table 3-1, Army Regulation 140-111 (U.S. Army Reserve Enlistment Program).  Rule J of Table 3-1 states that a Soldier may be extended for the period of time necessary to meet the service remaining requirements when that Soldier had been selected for attendance at a military school or training course.  This extension changed his ETS date from 7 November 2009 to 7 March 2010.

4.  On 13 June 2009, he successfully completed MOS 42A training (31 May 2009 to 13 June 2009) and on 22 June 2009, he was promoted to sergeant/E-5.

5.  On 30 July 2009, he was awarded primary MOS 42A and secondary MOS 94E.

6.  On 2 March 2010, he executed a 3-month extension of his initial 8-year USAR enlistment, under Rule M, Table 3-1, Army Regulation 140-11.  Rule M of Table 3-1 states that a Soldier may be extended for a period not to exceed 3 months when that Soldier is not eligible for reenlistment for reasons cited in this regulation or other directives; however, the disqualification is under adjudication pending a final determination, or may be waivable, and it is apparent the Soldier’s ETS will occur before adjudication or waiver processing can be finalized.

7.  His career counselor submitted a sworn statement, dated 24 November 2009, wherein he states that the applicant's intent had been to reenlist for a period of 3 years and that he extended him for 4 months under Rule J because his unit required him to extend.  This extension put him beyond his military service obligation (MSO) and thus moved him from a first term status to career status for the purpose of reenlistment.  However, the career counselor later learned that USARC had waived TIS requirements for DMOSQ training.  Since his MSO expired on 9 October 2009 (8 years from the date he enlisted in the DEP), he would have been eligible for a $5000.00 reenlistment bonus on that date.  But, since he only extended, he was eligible for half that amount. 

8.  Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, memorandum, dated 23 November 2004, Subject: Exception to Policy Regarding Ready Reserve Obligation Upon Completion of Training, waived the TIS requirement upon completion of training for Ready Reserve Soldiers provided they are otherwise qualified.   This policy was further clarified on 4 March 2009 to show the waiver applies to TIS requirements subsequent to MOS training only. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was improperly counseled with respect to the need to extend his enlistment contract in order to meet the DMOSQ training.  Accordingly, he executed a 4-month extension on 11 January 2009 followed by a 3-month extension on 2 March 2010.

2.  Since the DCS, G-1, approved a waiver of TIS requirements for Ready Reserve Soldiers who attend training, the applicant's 4-month extension, and his later 3-month extension, were not required.  He should have been allowed to reenlist in the USAR, provided he was otherwise qualified.  Considering he was allowed to extend twice, it appears he was otherwise qualified.

3.  Therefore, to improve unit cohesion through continuity and retain a high level of combat readiness, his 2 extensions should be cancelled and the forms should be removed from his records.  He should also be issued an antedated 3-year reenlistment (DD Form 4) in the USAR, effective 10 October 2009, with all the reenlistment incentives applicable on that date. 

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  voiding his DA Forms 4836 dated 11 January 2009 and 2 March 2010; and

	b.  granting him an antedated reenlistment for a period of 3 years effective on 10 October 2009 with all the reenlistment incentives applicable on that date.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021973





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021973



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012620

    Original file (20070012620.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 9 November 2007, obtained in the processing of this case, the Director, Army Reserve Active Duty Management Directorate, cited Rule P, table 3-8, Army Regulation 140-111 and recommended approval of the applicant's request to have his reenlistment contract, dated 26 June 2005, voided. AR 140-111 governs USAR reenlistment and extension programs. Since the applicant's ETS date is 21 March 2008, it is also appropriate to authorize an antedated extension or a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003301C070208

    Original file (20040003301C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his enlistment contract dated 8 October 1999; his DA Form 4836 dated 1 June 2000; his DA Form 4836 dated 29 April 2001; two USARC (U. S. Army Reserve Command) Forms 130-R (Reenlistment Eligibility Worksheet); and his DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record). The advisory opinion recommended correction of the 1 June 2000 extension, voiding of the 29 April 2001 extension, and authorizing the applicant a reenlistment bonus and the SLRP. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013240

    Original file (20130013240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is true he was not DMOSQ at the time of his extension * he was DMOSQ by 2 May 2007, well before his 12 July 2007 contract effective date * regarding acceptance of the AGR position, policy has since changed to allow a Soldier to retain incentives * he entered into a contract trusting he was eligible for the REB and SLRP * per the terms he had fully performed his end of the contract * he would not have agreed to the extension if not for the REB and SLRP 5. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021126

    Original file (20140021126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of his $15,000 reenlistment bonus (EB). A DA Form 4836, dated 3 June 2014, extended the applicant's enlistment, dated 9 July 2008, of 6 years for 22 months. His bonus addendum and Army Regulation 601-210 are clear that he was required to extend his enlistment within 90 days of his return to an active status on 20 July 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020456

    Original file (20110020456.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) that she executed on 3 February 2010 be voided and removed from her military service records. The applicant and a commissioned officer signed the document on 3 February 2010. d. Two email messages that show: (1) On 15 September 2011, an Army official indicated that the applicant: * was not authorized an affiliation bonus because she was required to reenlist for 1 year upon assignment and failed to do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011368

    Original file (20150011368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L to DD Form 4 – Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Addendum – Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS)), to show a properly approved and recorded bonus control number (BCN) on the date she enlisted; or, b. in the alternative, an exception to policy (ETP) to allow her to receive her Prior Service (PS) Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069746C070402

    Original file (2002069746C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that her unit extended her enlistment until 2 April 2001, and that extension together with the first 60 day extension met the guidance provided by the 88 th RSC. • On 21 September 2000 the 645 th SSA recommended to the 88 th RSC that based on the advice of the USARC (Army Reserve Command) [that even though the applicant was on the weight control program, the command still needed to address the erroneous extension], he recommended that separation action continue simultaneously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016316

    Original file (20140016316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he reenlisted for and is qualified to receive the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive. The applicant states, in effect: * his SLRP contract, dated 26 February 2010, was a valid contract for the incentive at the time of his extension * his unit readiness noncommissioned officer had him sign DA Forms 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) on 26 January and 25 February 2010, which when combined...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006220

    Original file (20050006220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Memorandum; Battalion Commander Memorandum of Support; DA Form 4836, dated 13 March 2003; Enlistment/Reenlistment Contract (DD Form 4, dated 18 May 1997; and Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A). Table 2-3 outlines the authorized periods of reenlistment for USAR TPU Soldiers, and paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on the USAR Indefinite Reenlistment Program. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001051

    Original file (20100001051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a reenlistment bonus in accordance with the terms of his approved antedated U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) reenlistment contract, dated 30 June 2007, and Bonus Control Number (BCN) ARG1-010808. On 4 June 2008, the applicant's battalion commander initiated a request for an exception to policy for him to execute an antedated enlistment contract effective 30 June 2007 to be eligible to receive a reenlistment bonus based on the fact that he had not been properly...