Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001994C070205
Original file (20060001994C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        17 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001994


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Peter B. Fisher               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Rowland C. Heflin             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was
discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 1 January 2005.

2.  The applicant states that the delay in processing his discharge, from
            1 January 2005 to 7 September 2005, has resulted in a debt of
$400 for Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance [premiums].

3.  The applicant provides a U. S. Army Human Resources Command – St. Louis
(USAHRC – STL) memorandum dated 1 July 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant has served in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

2.  After serving as a commissioned officer in the Regular Army, the
applicant was released from active duty on 29 September 1997 and
transferred to the USAR in the rank and grade of Captain, O-3.

3.  On 18 April 2004, the applicant was ordered to active duty, as an
Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA), and assigned to Headquarters and
Headquarters Company, 5th Corps.  He deployed to Kuwait/Iraq on 24 April
2004.

4.  By memorandum dated 1 July 2004, USAHRC – STL informed the applicant he
had been nonselected for promotion [for the second time].  He was informed
that he must be discharged not later than 1 January 2005.

5.  On an unknown date, the applicant requested early release from active
duty.  On 28 October 2004, his request was approved.

6.  On 16 November 2004, the applicant was released from active duty.

7.  Orders dated 8 September 2005 discharged the applicant from the USAR
effective 8 September 2005.

8.  The applicant’s Retirement Points History Statement confirms that he
did not perform any inactive duty after he was released from active duty in
November 2004.

9.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from
the Transition and Separations Branch, USAHRC – STL.  That office noted
that the applicant’s normal mandatory release date, after his second
nonselection for promotion, would have been 1 January 2005.  However, he
had been mobilized prior to receiving the notification and therefore was
not due to be removed until 90 days after demobilization (i.e., 16 July
2005) in accordance with the “Unit Stop Loss” [procedures outlined in]
Military Personnel Message Number 03-041.  The applicant was released from
mobilization early, in October 2005, but the systems were not corrected to
reflect his true status, and publication of his discharge orders was
prevented until his status codes did update.  That office noted that there
were no provisions in law for backdating his discharge orders.

10.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for
comment or rebuttal.  He rebutted that, in accordance with information
obtained from the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 (provided with his rebuttal),
reservists assigned to an Active Army unit are not subject to Stop Loss.
The Office of The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 confirmed that he was not
affected by the Stop Loss policy.  Nowhere on his memorandum of
nonselection does it mention that it may be overridden by Stop Loss.  He is
discouraged and frustrated that different sections within USAHRC do not
cross check data to eliminate issues such as these.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was an IMA who was mobilized, assigned to his Active Army
unit, and deployed to Operation Iraqi Freedom in April 2004.  In July 2004,
he was notified that he had been twice nonselected for promotion and was
required to be discharged no later than 1 January 2005.

2.  The applicant was released from active duty in November 2004.  However,
he was not discharged from the USAR until 8 September 2005.  His Retirement
Points History Statement confirms that he did not perform any inactive
training duties after his release from active duty.

3.  It appears that several Government errors occurred in this case.  It
appears the applicant’s status was not updated after he had been released
from active duty.  In addition, it appears his release date was originally
determined based upon a message pertaining to the Stop Loss of Reserve
Component units.  The applicant did not mobilize with a unit.  He mobilized
as an IMA.

4.  It would be equitable to correct the applicant’s records to show he was
discharged from the USAR effective 1 January 2005.

BOARD VOTE:

__jtm___  __pbf___  __rch___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing that orders discharging him from the USAR effective 1 January 2005
were published on 1 December 2004.




                                  __John T. Meixell_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060001994                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061017                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.10                                  |
|2.                      |135.00                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010830C070208

    Original file (20040010830C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant called the Delay and Exemption Board several times between 6 and 25 April 2004. The applicant states USAHRC – STL issued a memorandum notifying him he was being discharged. By memorandum dated 20 April 2004 and addressed to his home address, USAHRC – STL notified the applicant his request for exemption from active duty had not been finalized at that time and he was given an administrative delay of up to 30 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009433C070208

    Original file (20040009433C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By memorandum dated 24 September 2002, and apparently received by him on or about 10 October 2002, the applicant was notified that, even though he had not been recommended for promotion, a Selective Continuation board recommended him for continuation in his present grade. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states that a commissioned officer vacates his Army Reserve appointment when he accepts a Regular Army appointment in a commissioned grade; accepts a promotion to a higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003904

    Original file (20080003904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum, dated 11 September 2006, Subject: Promotion Policies for Reserve Component (RC) Enlisted Soldiers on Active Duty for Operational Support (ADOS) in Excess of 12 Months and Sanctuary Soldiers, USARC provided clarification to the 26 June 2006 memorandum. In a memorandum, dated 30 April 2007, Subject: Clarification and Change to Promotion Policies for Army Reserve Troop Program (TPU) Enlisted Soldiers on Active Duty for Operational support (ADOS) and Sanctuary Soldiers, USARC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016340C070206

    Original file (20050016340C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he believes that the effective date of his antedated Enlistment Contract should be 21 February 2005 and not 3 August 2004. The director stated that the applicant's ETS date was 2 August 2004 according to his Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment dated 24 July 2003, and that the memorandum approving the antedated reenlistment directed that the Department of the Army authorized date of 3 August 2004 would be used when preparing the DD Form 4/1. The director indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011707

    Original file (20070011707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was granted a military education waiver and he was promoted to the rank of Major (MAJ)/O4. That office stated that, on 14 February 2007, the applicant requested a military education waiver but was denied (board convened on 12 March 2007). Physicals are valid for five years and the applicant should have had enough time to obtain an updated physical prior to the selection board convening.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007799C071029

    Original file (20070007799C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a 7 August 2006 letter from HRC-STL to his Congressman, which indicated the applicant had been identified to, but removed from, the 2000 CPT, Army Promotion List, Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) due to his time spent in the Inactive Army National Guard as of 1 February 2000. Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance, chapter 13, states that a commissioned officer who is notified of a two-time nonselect for promotion, and is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002542C070205

    Original file (20060002542C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides promotion memorandums dated 28 February 2005 and 17 March 2005; a void promotion memorandum dated 28 February 2005; State promotion orders dated 31 May 2005; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) memorandum dated 1 September 2004; an 8 September 2005 letter from the Office of the Inspector General, NGB; active duty orders dated 9 June 2004; deployment orders dated 4 August 2004; and a DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), examination completed on 10 August 2003. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000585C080213

    Original file (20080000585C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records at the AGR Branch, USAHRC – STL show that the applicant was considered but not selected for promotion by the 2001, 2002, and 2003 AGR E-7 promotion boards. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, paragraph 1-8e, stated that, when orders are published revoking an advancement or promotion, the Soldier's service in the higher grade may be determined to have been de facto so as to allow the Soldier to retain pay and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010642C071029

    Original file (20070010642C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. USAHRC – STL Orders D-03-511765, dated 29 March 2005, discharged the applicant, as a Private, E-1 in MOS 11B, from the USAR effective 29 March 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. removing USAHRC –STL Orders C-03-505520, dated 25 March 2005, and USAHRC – STL Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003854

    Original file (20080003854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 26 August 2003, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command – St. Louis that he was not selected a second time for promotion. It stated, "A review of the applicant's records revealed that he was considered, but non-selected by the 2002 and 2003 Chief Warrant Officer Four Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board as a member of the Individual Ready Reserve. Evidence shows that he was well aware of the 2002 and 2003 DA RCSBs and...