Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001683C070205
Original file (20060001683C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        28 September 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001683


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda Simmons                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Paul Smith                    |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Alice Muellerweiss            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her rank and discharge date be corrected on
her DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate).

2.  The applicant states that she was promoted to pay grade E-5 on 1 June
2003 but her discharge shows her rank as specialist.  She also contends
that her correct expiration term of service (ETS) was 26 January 2005.

3.  The applicant provides promotion orders and a DD Form 256A, dated
8 February 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 January
1997 for a period of 8 years.  She enlisted in the Regular Army on 14
February 1997 for a period of 5 years.  On 13 February 2002, she was
released from active duty in the rank of specialist to complete her
remaining service obligation in the USAR.

2.  The applicant provided promotion orders, dated 1 June 2003, which show
she was promoted to sergeant in the USAR.  These orders also state that the
promotion is not valid and that these orders will be revoked if she is not
in a promotable status on the effective date of promotion.  In addition,
these orders state that this promotion is awarded with the condition the
applicant must successfully complete the Noncommissioned Officer Education
System Course required for the grade to which promoted.

3.  Discharge orders, dated 8 February 2005, show the applicant was
honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of specialist.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 256A shows her rank as specialist and her
discharge date as 8 February 2005.

5.  Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies governing the
administrative separation of enlisted Soldiers from the Army National Guard
of the United States and the USAR.  In pertinent part it states that upon
ETS, the Soldier will be discharged by the separation authority.  It also
states that when through administrative error a Soldier is not discharged
on the actual date of his or her ETS, he or she will be considered to have
been retained beyond normal discharge date for the convenience of the
Government.

6.  Paragraph 8-2e of Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel
Classification, Promotion, and Reduction) states that a Soldier must be a
Primary Leadership Development Course or Primary Noncommissioned Officer
Course graduate to be eligible for promotion to sergeant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the orders provided by the applicant show she was promoted to
sergeant in the USAR on 1 June 2003, her discharge orders show she was
separated in the rank of specialist.  It appears she did not meet the
specific conditions for promotion to sergeant.

2.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was discharged
on 25 January 2005.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the
applicant’s request to amend her DD Form 256A.

2.  The applicant’s expiration term of service came up and by regulation
she was required to be discharged; however, since she was not discharged
until
8 February 2005, she was considered to have been retained for the
convenience of the Government.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

LS_____  __PS____  _AM_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the
existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



                                  ___Linda Simmons______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060001683                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060928                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0000                                |
|2.                      |100.0200                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019809

    Original file (20090019809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records show that he served in the Army National Guard (ARNG) from 25 September 1999 until he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 3 April 2003 for a period of 3 years. For this reason, the Board will not correct item 18 of his DD Form 214 to show a lesser number of days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011259C070208

    Original file (20040011259C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides her Active Guard Reserve assignment orders; her email notification of selection for promotion; a Personnel Action (DA Form 4187) requesting deferment of ANCOC with an attachment; a Personnel Action requesting to attend Service School; a Personnel Action requesting separation; her Request and Authority for Leave (DA Form 31); e-mails regarding her expiration of term of service (ETS) paperwork, rank reduction, and service member assistance; an amendment to reduction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000855C071029

    Original file (20070000855C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that after returning from BNCOC she was told she would have to wait until the following year for the IRR/IMA promotion board and that she would not have to compete on the active duty side at all. In these messages, she is communicating with both active duty and USAR promotion officials trying to determine how and when she would be considered for promotion. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was not eligible for consideration for promotion to SFC until she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012595

    Original file (20140012595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her record be corrected to show she retired in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7. The evidence appears to show the applicant was unable to attend ANCOC due to failing the APFT. Based on the foregoing, the applicant provided insufficient evidence to support her claim that her record should be corrected to show she retired in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088146C070403

    Original file (2003088146C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's personnel records contain a DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) dated 5 April 2001. In a telephone conversation on 29 January 2004 with the 6th Brigade, 84th Division, the staff of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records was informed that the applicant did not meet reenlistment criteria (APFT failure), she had less than 18 years of qualifying service as of October 2002, and she was flagged for [not meeting] body fat [standards]. When...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007889

    Original file (20120007889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 13 February 2006, to show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years vice 8 years * Orders Number 09-197-00001, dated 16 July 2009, issued by Headquarters (HQ), 151st Theater Information Operations Group (TIOG), Fort Totten, NY, be revoked 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the USAR, on 13 February 2006, for a period of 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011040

    Original file (20060011040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 28 September 1992, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and reenlisted in the USAR on 27 September 1995 for a period of 6 years making her expiration term of service (ETS) 26 September 2001. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center show the applicant received VSI payments from the time of her separation from active duty in 1992 to around September 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009853

    Original file (20060009853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 25 May 1985, that shows she was honorably REFRAD after completing 3 years of total active service. In support of her application, the applicant provides a DA Form 873 that shows, in pertinent part, she was granted a Secret security clearance on 23 May 1979; a DA Form 134 that shows she successfully completed 4 years of instruction in the Senior ROTC on 15 May 1981; 2 pages of a DA Form 2-1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009113

    Original file (20060009113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be amended to show her correct rank in item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank). Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Birmingham, Alabama Orders 03-132-00015, dated 12 May 2003, promoted the applicant from SGT to SSG with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 9 May 2003.