Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001446C070205
Original file (20060001446C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        3 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001446


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Margaret Patterson            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Michael Flynn                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Gerald Purcelli               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of
the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served as a
helicopter gunner.

2.  The applicant states he was a gunner and did not perform medical
duties.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his
application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 20 September 1968.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 23 January 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 23 September 1966.  He
completed basic combat training and advanced individual training.

4.  Headquarters, General Leonard Wood Army Hospital, Special Orders
Number 37 dated 2 March 1967 awarded the applicant primary military
occupational specialty (PMOS) 91A (Medical Corpsman).

5.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was
awarded PMOS 91B (Medical Specialist) on 29 May 1967.

6.  Medical Company, General Leonard Wood Army Hospital Unit Orders Number
69 dated 23 October 1967 promoted the applicant to specialist four in MOS
91B.

7.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Headquarters and
Headquarters Detachment, 25th Aviation Battalion, 25th Infantry Division in
Vietnam in January 1968 in duty MOS 91B as a medical specialist.
8.  The applicant’s personnel records contain a form dated 15 February 1968
which recommended that he be placed on flying status effective 15 February
1968 until further disposition.  The form identified the applicant as a
“shotgunner” medic.  The flight surgeon indicated that this form should be
kept in the applicant’s flight records and, from a medical standpoint, the
applicant could perform flying duties as long as this form was not replaced
by a document specifying suspension from flying status.

9.  Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division Special Orders Number 117 dated
26 April 1968 assigned the applicant hazardous duty as a non-crewmember
effective 15 February 1968.  His MOS is shown as 91B on the standard name
line.

10.  The applicant departed Vietnam in June 1968 and was reassigned to Fort
Leonard Wood, Missouri.  His reassignment orders show his MOS as 91B.

11.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Leonard Wood Special
Orders Number 261 dated 17 September 1968 released the applicant from
active duty on 20 September 1968.  His separation orders show his MOS as
91B.

12.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) on the applicant's DD Form 214
shows the entry “91B20 MED SP.”

13.  Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the
DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's
most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-
cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty,
retirement or discharge.  In pertinent part, it directs that the primary
MOS code number and title will be entered in item 23a on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the applicant completed training in MOS 91A and was
awarded PMOS 91A.  He was later awarded PMOS 91B as a medical specialist.

2.  The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record shows he held PMOS 91B as
a medical specialist in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant contends that he was a gunner and did not perform medical
duties.  His service records do contain a disposition which identified him
as a “shotgunner” medic and it was recommended that he be placed on flying
status. However, there is no evidence of record which shows he w as later
reclassified into a PMOS as a helicopter gunner.
4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 20 September 1968.  At
that time, his DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect his PMOS as
91B.  The entry in item 23a was meant to indicate what MOS he held at the
time of his separation, not the MOS(s) in which he performed duties.
Therefore, there is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct his DD Form
214 to show he held a PMOS as a helicopter gunner.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 20 September 1968; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 19 September 1968.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

MP______  MF______  GP______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  Margaret Patterson____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060001446                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060803                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0500                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003920

    Original file (20110003920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there are no orders or any other evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded 67N or any other 67-series MOS as his PMOS. Thus, item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the correct PMOS code and title. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's military service records or the entry in item 23a of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069018C070402

    Original file (2002069018C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007503

    Original file (20090007503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 12B when he was released from active duty. The evidence shows that at the time the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he held MOS 62F. He was promoted in MOS 12B and on his release from active duty, he held this MOS as his primary MOS and MOS 62F as his secondary MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074427C070403

    Original file (2002074427C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she was entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Her DD Form 214 shows that she completed 4 months and 27 days of active military service and that she was awarded MOS 91A as her primary MOS. The available evidence supports that the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct in that it shows she served in the RA in an active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018847

    Original file (20080018847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Combat Medical Badge. The applicant contends that he suffers from PTSD due to him serving as a Medic during Vietnam and should be awarded the Combat Medical Badge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded PMOS 91B, Medical Specialist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021187

    Original file (20100021187.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 22 (MOS) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: Type Code Title Date PMOS 91A Medical Corpsman 24 Apr 1970 PMOS 91B Medical Specialist 16 Sep 1970 4. The applicant's contention that he was a 91B Medic instead of a 91E2O Medic with a related civilian occupation and DOT number of Dental Assistant 079.378 was carefully considered and found to have merit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012855

    Original file (20060012855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of or was caused by enemy action, that it required treatment by military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021377

    Original file (20140021377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for award of the Purple Heart. As part of his claim he includes orders showing his assignment as a crew chief. In order to request an award under Title 10 USC 1130, the applicant must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024494

    Original file (20100024494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 27 (Military Schools) shows he successfully completed the 8-week Cook course and he was awarded MOS 94B in 1967. c. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1968 through 23 January 1969. d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...