RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 January 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050011363
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Kenneth L. Wright | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Dale E. DeBruler | |Member |
| |Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
rated disability for his foot condition be approved for Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states that he made 357 parachute jumps during his 15
years as a paratrooper in the Army. His foot condition is the result of
those parachute jumps.
3. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC
application and a VA rating decision. In the VA rating decision it was
stated that the applicant “acknowledged that there was no evidence of
treatment for the claimed condition noted in his service medical records.
Service medical records [from] 1975 to 1996 were reviewed, but failed to
produce any findings of treatment for, or diagnosis of, the claimed
condition.”
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment
of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for
combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for
a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension. Payment is made by
the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free. Eligible members are
those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or
20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who
have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially
hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by
an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA
and rated at least 10% disabling. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the
date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which
they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled
or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war,
or caused by an instrumentality of war. Military retirees who are approved
for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since
CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived
retired pay to the military retiree.
2. On 21 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s
request for CRSC.
3. In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
2. The applicant has not stated that a particular injury caused his VA
rated disability. By the applicant’s own admission, he was never treated
for foot problems while he was on active duty.
3. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the
applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is
insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___klw__ ____qas _ ____ded_ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_________Kenneth L. Wright______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050011363 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20060110 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003005C070206
Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. However, medical records must establish that a military retiree was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000884C070205
Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006308C070206
Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. While a disability resulting from a military parachute jump would certainly be considered combat related, the applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate that his traumatic arthritis was caused by an injury incurred during a parachute jump. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s COPD and traumatic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001015C070205
Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, VA rating decisions, excerpts from his military records, his separation document, and a correction to his separation document dated 1 April 2005 which adds the Basic Airborne course. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003959C070206
Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, a statement from an individual who states that the applicant told him that he had landed hard in a parachute jump and his back hurt as a result of that hard landing, and VA rating decisions. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002641C070206
Brenda K. Koch | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On his VA rating decision it was stated that “Your contentions were that due to parachute landing falls in service you had arthritis of the lumbar spine . However, the VA rating decision cited by the applicant states that the applicant reported that his degenerative arthritis of spine was due to parachute jumping, and that there were no medical records to show...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018831
The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Specifically, the VA determined the following conditions to be service-related but there is insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related: a. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001982C070205
Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002743C070206
Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 28 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s traumatic arthritis was not combat related and denied his request for CRSC. The applicant has not submitted any evidence which would show that his traumatic arthritis is combat related.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005183
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. It is noted that the applicant's records were destroyed during the fire at the Records Center in St. Louis, however,...