Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003959C070206
Original file (20050003959C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            15 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:    AR20050003959


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
rated disability for his back condition be approved for Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that he had landed sideways in high-wind
conditions while parachuting in 1954.  He was dragged quite a ways when he
landed, and was momentarily stunned.  When medical personnel arrived he had
pretty well recovered though he had pain in his lower back.  He refused
medical treatment because he was hoping to become a helicopter pilot and
thought that any injury report would hurt his chances of becoming a pilot.


3.  The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC
application, a statement from an individual who states that the applicant
told him that he had landed hard in a parachute jump and his back hurt as a
result of that hard landing, and VA rating decisions.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was released from active duty on 1 June 1976 as a
lieutenant colonel and placed on the Retired List the following day.

2.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment
of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for
combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for
a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by
the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are
those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or
20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who
have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially
hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by
an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA
and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the
date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which
they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled
or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war,
or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved
for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since
CRSC consists of the Military Department returned a portion of the waived
retired pay to the military retiree.
3.  On 1 February 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s
request for CRSC.

4.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The statement the applicant submitted shows that he told his friend
that he hurt his back during a parachute jump in 1954.  However, he also
told his friend that he did not receive any medical treatment for that
injury.  While the applicant believes that his VA rated disability for his
back condition was the result of that injury, he has not submitted any
evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship between that injury and
his VA rated disability for his back condition.  It is noted that the
applicant served on active duty for 22 years after that injury, and retired
in the rank of lieutenant colonel.

3.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the
applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is
insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__sk____  ___jtm___  ___rld___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            _________Stanley Kelley_________
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003959                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051115                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |












-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003005C070206

    Original file (20050003005C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. However, medical records must establish that a military retiree was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000884C070205

    Original file (20060000884C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002617C070206

    Original file (20050002617C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Patrick H. McGann Jr. | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for back strain be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). In his second application he states that he wants the Purple Heart he was issued for hurting his back when his APC ran over a landmine “added.” 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013327

    Original file (20070013327.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Ms. Linda D. Simmons Chairperson Mr. David K. Haasenritter Member Mr. Edward E. Montgomery Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003492C070206

    Original file (20050003492C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He treated the applicant for back and knee injuries that were caused when he fell from his tank during combat training; and c. The applicant injured his shoulders in 1994 when he was bounced around in his tank. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011523

    Original file (20070011523.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, the VA informed the applicant that his disabilities were service-related but there was insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related or that they were sustained during training exercises that simulate war. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002738C070206

    Original file (20050002738C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002641C070206

    Original file (20050002641C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Brenda K. Koch | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On his VA rating decision it was stated that “Your contentions were that due to parachute landing falls in service you had arthritis of the lumbar spine . However, the VA rating decision cited by the applicant states that the applicant reported that his degenerative arthritis of spine was due to parachute jumping, and that there were no medical records to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002104C070206

    Original file (20050002104C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the applicant’s case the Board must consider whether the VA ratings for the applicant’s ankles, knees and back are combat related. At that time it was stated that the applicant’s back pain had been documented since 1977. Based on this chronological review of the treatment the applicant received for his VA rated disabilities, it is evident that the applicant submitted insufficient evidence to show: a. that his shoulder pain should be approved for CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012293

    Original file (20060012293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and excerpts from his military personnel and medical records. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an...