RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 October 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050009609
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John T. Meixell | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. James B. Gunlicks | |Member |
| |Ms. Jeanette R. McCants | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to chief
warrant officer three (CW3).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion packets were
incomplete.
3. The applicant provides copies of his officer evaluation reports for the
periods 1 December 2002 through 30 November 2003 and 1 December 2003
through 30 September 2004 in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis,
Missouri, It was determined that the applicant’s official military
personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and
non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2004 Reserve Components Selection
Board (RCSB). His officer evaluation report for the period ending 30
November 2003 was not seen. It was also determined that the applicant’s
OMPF did not contain material error when he was considered and non-selected
for promotion to CW3 by the 2003 RCSB. Therefore, he has no basis for
consideration under the 2003 criteria.
2. The applicant is currently serving on deployment on active duty.
3. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion consideration/
reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration
or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's OMPF did not contain material error when reviewed for
promotion to CW3 by the 2003 RCSB; therefore, he does not have a basis for
a SSB under the 2003 criteria.
2. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for
promotion to CW3 by the 2004 RCSB and should now be submitted for
appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose.
3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
_JBG___ _JRM____ __JTM__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by placing the officer evaluation report for the period ending 30
November 2003 on the OMPF of the individual concerned.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his
records be submitted to a duly constituted SSB as deemed appropriate for
promotion consideration for CW3 under the 2004 criteria.
3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to CW3 on his date of eligibility, as determined by appropriate
Departmental officials, under the 2004 criteria, provided he was otherwise
qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
4. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
____John T. Meixell_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050009609 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/10/20 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.00 |
|2. |131.10 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087565C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. Reserve promotion policy also specifies that promotion as a result of recommendation of an SSB convened under this section shall, upon such promotion, have the same date of rank, the same...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009527C070208
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resource Command (AHRC) – St. Louis reviewed the applicant’s record and determined he was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 and 2002 RCSBs, and that he was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2001 and 2002 CW4 RCSB selection criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. If selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090455C070212
The applicant states that he should have been selected for promotion to CW3 as there was no adverse or unfavorable information in his official military personnel file (OMPF) and he met all the fully qualified criteria to be selected for promotion. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062183C070421
He states that his microfiche was not correctly presented to the 1999 promotion selection board and did not contain his military education. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and nonselected by the 1999 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072419C070403
The applicant states that the only information submitted to the 2001 selection board were two officer evaluation reports (OER's). Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained a material error of missing documents when he was considered and non-selected by the 2001 CW3 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). c. that all documents related to his now-voided non-selection...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000609C070206
The evidence stated as being submitted with the applicant's application was not provided to the Board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2003 and 2004 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). The Board determined...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085036C070212
records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility and that if the applicant was separated because of his non-selection, his records be further corrected to show that his discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve, was void, and of no force or effect; that he was credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement for his respective retirement years, from the date of his now-voided transfer to the Retired Reserve to the date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091750C070212
The applicant states that he was not provided due process because the majority of his official military personnel file (OMPF) was not available for review by the promotion selection boards and the special selection boards (SSB's). Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), it was determined that the applicant’s OMPF contained material error when he was considered and not selected for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017287 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant was considered and not selected for...