Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026823
Original file (20100026823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026823 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his retired pay be changed to major (MAJ)/O-4.

2.  He states he was promoted to MAJ in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and he turned 60 years old on 25 July 2010.  He was released from active duty as a captain (CPT)/O-3 on 1 January 1987 and came back on active duty on 2 January 1987 as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  He retired as a CPT on 31 August 1992.  

3.  He provides:

* a memorandum informing him of his promotion to MAJ in the USAR
* retirement orders
* two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Following a period of enlisted service, the applicant was commissioned in the USAR on 6 March 1975.  He served on active duty from the date he was commissioned until he was honorably relieved from active duty as a CPT on 1 January 1987.  He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) as a SGT on 2 January 1987 and served until he retired for length of service on 31 August 1992.  He completed 20 years and 1 day of active military service.

3.  On 17 August 1988, the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (Provisional), St. Louis, MO, informed him he was promoted to MAJ as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army effective 5 May 1988.  The memorandum noted he was serving on active duty as a staff sergeant/E-6 at the time.

4.  On 10 December 1991, the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, Alexandria, VA, issued Orders S236-3 retiring him from active service, placing him on the retired list, transferring him to the USAR (Retired Reserve), and assigning him to the USAR Control Group (Retired).  The orders show his retired grade of rank was CPT.  

5.  The record is void of documentation showing he served on active duty as a MAJ.

6.  On 25 March 2003, the Army Review Boards Agency Senior Legal Advisor informed him his case could not be forwarded to the Army Grade Determination Review Board.  He was informed that to be eligible to be advanced to MAJ/O-4 on the retired list he must have served on active duty in that grade for not less than 6 months.  He was asked to provide documentation showing he had served on active duty as a MAJ for not less than 6 months.  The record is void of evidence that he did so.  

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370 provides that, unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a commissioned officer (other than a commissioned warrant officer) will be retired in the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned, for not less than 6 months.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3964 provides that each retired RA enlisted member who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which he/she satisfactorily served on active duty, as determined by the Secretary of the Army.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The record is void of documentation showing the applicant served on active duty in the rank of MAJ.  The available records show CPT was the highest rank in which he served satisfactorily on active duty, and he was placed on the retired list in that rank.  In the absence of documentation showing he served on active duty satisfactorily in the rank of MAJ, he is not entitled to receive retired pay in that rank.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026823





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026823



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009125

    Original file (20120009125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his dual component status so he can be reissued a military identification (ID) card showing his rank as major (MAJ). The applicant provides: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 27 July 2012 * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel), dated 17 November 1980 * letter of appointment to CPT in the USAR * letter of promotion to MAJ in the USAR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003418

    Original file (20140003418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    TAPC Orders S130-21, dated 13 July 1994, states his retired grade for pay is CPT and his retired grade of rank is MAJ. 6. There is no evidence the applicant served on active duty as a MAJ. 7. There is no evidence he served on active duty in the grade of MAJ.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016773

    Original file (20090016773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 June 2008, the applicant was ordered to active duty to obtain 20 years of active Federal service under the Extended Active Duty (EAD) Sanctuary Program. The applicant's records show he was honorably retired on 30 November 2009 and was placed on the retired list in his retired rank/grade of MAJ/O-4. The applicant in this case completed 8 months and 28 days of active service in the promoted grade upon his retirement on 30 November 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015526

    Original file (20130015526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Highest grade held on active duty was CPT (USAR). The orders also show: * Retired Grade: SFC E-7 * Transferred to Retired Reserve as MAJ (USAR) * Highest grade held on active duty was CPT (USAR) 8. There is no evidence the applicant served on active duty in the rank of MAJ.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011178C070206

    Original file (20050011178C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served from November 1967 to March 1974 as a Reserve officer on active duty (AD). While serving on AD, in the rank of SGM/E-9, the applicant was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to lieutenant colonel effective 11 December 1986, without being called to AD in that rank. The Board also finds no evidence that the applicant served 6 consecutive months on active duty as a LTC/O-5 or to show that he served satisfactorily in the grade of LTC in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019739

    Original file (20130019739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he served continuously as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entitlement to adjustment of his pay and allowances at the pay grade O-4 rate. If selected, the Board further recommended correction of his records to show: a. he was promoted to MAJ on his date of eligibility provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion; b. his transfer to the Retired Reserve for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007246

    Original file (20080007246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his retired rank as a major (MAJ) instead of captain (CPT). Rather, his service on active duty after his REFRAD as a USAR CPT was entirely served as an enlisted member of the Regular Army. It has been noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he was REFRAD as a MAJ O-4 and further indicates that he was serving as a commissioned officer at the time of his REFRAD, when in fact he was serving on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018687

    Original file (20140018687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant truly believes that, after his acceptance of appointment to the rank/pay grade of chief warrant officer two (CW2)/W-2 and the pattern of his speedy advancement to the rank/pay grade of CW4/W-4, had he been retained on active duty as an RA officer in the rank/pay grade of MAJ/O-4, he would have advanced to at least the rank/pay grade of LTC/O-5 in a relatively short time and been able to retire in that grade. The applicant's requests for correction of his record to show that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062784C070421

    Original file (2001062784C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that in order for a Reserve officer below the rank of lieutenant colonel to be credited with satisfactory service in a higher grade, they must have served satisfactorily in that grade as a Reserve commissioned officer in an active status, or in a retired status on active duty, for not less than six months. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009887

    Original file (20070009887.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 December 1979, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, Virginia, published Orders Number 339-1, announcing the applicant's promotion to SFC/E-7 with an effective date of 1 January 1980 and a date of rank of 31 December 1979. Evidence of record further shows that the applicant held a dual status as a commissioned officer in the USAR and as an enlisted member of the RA on active duty. Although the applicant was promoted to the grade of MAJ/O-4 effective 16 December 1977, there...