Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006064C070206
Original file (20050006064C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        6 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050006064


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson        |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Curtis L. Greenway            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he received an injury during contact with the
enemy at Firebase Ennis near Bien Hoa, South Vietnam.  The applicant
further states that he was evacuated by military helicopter to Bien Hoa for
medical attention and stitches.

3.  The applicant contends the medical officer who treated him assured him
that he would receive the Purple Heart for his injuries.

4.  The applicant further contends that he waited patiently for his
separation and that at the time of his injuries the Purple Heart and
bonuses were not important.  The applicant concludes that now the Purple
Heart means much more to him.

5.  The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a copy of his DA Form 20
(Enlisted Qualification Record), and a two-page chronological record of
medical care in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 3 June 1972, the date of his release from active duty.
The application submitted in this case is dated 11 March 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's records show that he was inducted on 18 August 1970.
He completed combat basic training and advanced individual training and was
awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B40 (Gunner).  The
applicant served a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam during the
period 28 July 1971 through 2 June 1972.  The applicant was honorably
separated from active duty on 3 June 1972.
4.  Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on the applicant's DD Form 214 does
not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification
Record) does not show any entries for wounds received.  Item 41 (Awards and
Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  There are no medical records in the applicant's official military
personnel file that show he sustained wounds as a result of hostile action
or that show he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile
action.

7.  There are no general orders in the applicant's records to show he was
awarded the Purple Heart.

8.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

9.  The applicant provided a chronological record of medical care dated, 9
April 1972.  This report shows the applicant was treated for a laceration
to his index finger on his left hand.  There is no indication on this
report that the injury was received as a result of hostile action.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been
treated by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made
a matter of official records.  This regulation also provides that there is
no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

11.  Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional
awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of
the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on
Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.

13.  The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service
Medal.  However, his DD Form 214 does not show any bronze service stars
indicating campaign credit.  His records indicate he participated in
Consolidation I, Consolidation II, and the Vietnam Cease-Fire campaigns.
14.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the applicant
participated in three campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.  This
same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear
on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart
because of injuries sustained while engaged in contact with the enemy.

2.  There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the
Purple Heart.  There is no evidence in his service personnel records which
shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or
treated for such wounds.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam
Casualty Roster.

3.  In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as
a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is
insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this
case.

4.  Orders show the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry
Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of
his records to show this award.

5.  Records show that the applicant participated in three campaigns during
his service in Vietnam.  Therefore is eligible for award of three bronze
service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 3 June 1972; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 2 June 1975.  Although the applicant did not file within the
ABCMR's statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to
timely file based on the fact there is no statute of limitations on
requests for award of the Purple Heart.

7.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_RTD____  _LMD___  _CLG___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that it was appropriate to waive failure to timely
file in this case.

2.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned to show award of the Purple Heart.

3.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with
Palm Unit Citation and three bronze service stars to be affixed to the
Vietnam Service Medal.



                                       __Curtis L. Greenway_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050006064                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/10/06                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |Deny                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0000.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206

    Original file (20050006023C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020056

    Original file (20090020056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014545

    Original file (20080014545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014545 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although the applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, there is sufficient documentary evidence in this case to show the applicant sustained injury to his ears and a loss of hearing as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010525

    Original file (20060010525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded the Parachutist Badge by Headquarters, Training Support Battalion, Fort Benning, Georgia, Special Order Number 31, dated 4 February 1970. Therefore, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal should be added to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072678C070403

    Original file (2002072678C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized). There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070823C070402

    Original file (2002070823C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that, on or about 29 March 1969, he was injured in a rocket attack while serving in Vietnam, but was not awarded the Purple Heart. In support of his application, the applicant submitted a 9 October 2001 statement from a former fellow soldier with whom he served in Vietnam; a copy of orders showing that this fellow soldier was assigned to the 520th Personnel Service Company; a 5 October 2001 statement from a second former soldier who states the he worked on the same...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009823

    Original file (20100009823.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 9 October 1969 through 31 December 1969. Kelly) Dxxxxx as being assigned to 1st platoon, Company D. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence showing the applicant met the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057002C070420

    Original file (2001057002C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was authorized awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with palm during the period (18 months) in which the applicant was assigned to the 117 th Aviation Company. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012637

    Original file (20090012637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry in Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 19 July 1968 to 14 May 1969 based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for service from 18 March 1868 to 2 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011273

    Original file (20090011273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and/or treated for such wounds. The statement submitted by the applicant's former unit member is insufficient by itself to support an award of the Purple Heart in this case. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action or as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle,"...