| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam.
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 27 February 1968 and never received the Purple Heart for the shrapnel wound he received to the head. In support of his application he submits a statement from a fellow member of his unit and a copy of a Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer’s Log (DA Form 1594) showing that he was wounded in action (WIA).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted with parental consent on 24 January 1964 for a period of 3 years and training as an armor crewman. He completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 13 June 1964.
5. He reenlisted on 9 March 1965 for a period of 4 years and training as a helicopter repairman. He departed Germany on 10 April 1966 and was transferred to Fort Eustis, Virginia for his training. Upon completion of his training he was transferred to Vietnam and was assigned to the 140th Transportation Detachment, 117th Assault Helicopter Company. He was promoted to the rank of specialist five (SP5) on 15 September 1967.
6. A line of duty investigation was conducted on 19 March 1968 in Bien Hoa, South Vietnam which determined that the applicant had been wounded in a fire fight (ambush) between Honour Smith Compound and Bien Hoa Air Force Base on 27 February 1968, that he had been treated at the Air Force dispensary for a shrapnel wound to the head and was returned to duty. The report concluded that his wound was in the line of duty. There is no indication in his records that he was ever awarded the Purple Heart for his wound.
7. He completed his tour in Vietnam on 21 May 1968 and was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona, with duty in El Paso, Texas. He remained there until he was honorably discharged on 7 March 1969. He had served 5 years, 2 months and 15 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Air Medal and the Aircraft Crewman Badge.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
9. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.
10. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was authorized awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with palm during the period (18 months) in which the applicant was assigned to the 117th Aviation Company.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 27 February 1968 while serving as SP5 in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel.
2. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that as result of an administrative oversight, he was not awarded the Purple Heart that he was entitled to receive. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct this error at this time.
3. The Board also determined that the applicant is entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/palm, and the MUC for his Vietnam service with the 117th Aviation Company during the period of 25 November 1966 to 21 May 1968. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against an armed enemy on 27 February 1968 while serving in Vietnam in the rank of SP5 and by also awarding him the RVNGC w/palm and the MUC that were awarded to his unit as well.
BOARD VOTE:
__inw___ ___fe ___ ___gw___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Irene N. Wheelwright___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001057002 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/08/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 3. 80 | 107.0034/MUC |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077699C070215
The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted on 19 July 1961 and served as a cook, until he was honorably discharged on 3 September 1964. Upon departing Vietnam, he was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona, where he served as a cook, was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 6 July 1967 and then served as a mess steward. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action or that he was treated for such.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019277
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016021
The applicant requests his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064440C070421
A review of his records, to include the medical and physical examination conducted at the time of separation fails to reveal that the applicant was wounded while in Vietnam. Additionally, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 11 April 1968 to 10 April 1970. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014545
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014545 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although the applicants name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, there is sufficient documentary evidence in this case to show the applicant sustained injury to his ears and a loss of hearing as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029965
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007746
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows the 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during a period of time the applicant was assigned to the unit based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970. Evidence of record shows the applicant's second digit of his service number is "4." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083054C070215
He had served 1 year, 11 months and 22 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Good Conduct Medal. The Board has noted the applicant's contentions; however, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his applicant or the evidence of record that he was wounded/injured as result of enemy action and that he was treated for the wound/injury at the time. In...