Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005520C070206
Original file (20050005520C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           6 December 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050005520


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Bernard P. Ingold             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Donald W. Steenfott           |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Edward E. Montgomery          |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Overseas Service
Ribbon.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Overseas
Service Ribbon and it is not included in the list of awards contained on
his Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22).  He
claims he served overseas and is entitled to this award.

3.  The applicant provides State of California, Office of The Adjutant
General (OTAG) Orders Number (#) 110-4 and North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) Travel Orders in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 31 August 1993.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
1 April 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s record shows he was discharged from the ARNG and
transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 August 1993.  The NGB Form 22 he
was issued at the time shows he held the rank of colonel at the time.  Item
15 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign
Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he earned the following awards:  Army
Commendation Medal; Army Achievement Medal; Army Reserve Components
Achievement Medal (2); Armed Forces Reserve Medal; and two State awards.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of State of California, OTAG Orders # 110-
4, dated 24 May 1990, which ordered him to active duty for training for 21
days from 10 through 30 June 1990.  These orders attached him to the 2nd
General Hospital, Lundstuhl, West Germany for duty.  NATO travel orders
provided by the applicant corroborate the information contained in Orders #
110-04.
5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army’s awards
policy.  Paragraph 5-3 contains guidance on award of the Army Reserve
Components Overseas Training Ribbon.  It states, in pertinent part, that it
is awarded to members of the Reserve Components of the Army, (Army National
Guard and U.S. Army Reserve), for successful completion of annual training
(AT) or active duty for training (ADT) for a period not less than 10
consecutive duty days on foreign soil.

6.  Paragraph 5-4 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the
Overseas Service Ribbon.  It states, in pertinent part, it is authorized
for members upon completion of a normal overseas tour as defined in Army
Regulation 614-30, which stipulates the normal with dependents tour length
for Germany is 36 months and the normal without dependents tour length is
24 months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim of entitlement to the Overseas Service Ribbon and
the supporting documents he submitted were carefully considered.  However,
by regulation, the Overseas Service Ribbon is authorized to members serving
on active duty who are credited with completing a normal overseas tour.
The normal with dependents tour for Germany is 36 months and the normal
without dependents tour is 24 months.  As a result, the applicant’s ADT in
Germany does not qualify him for this award.

2.  By regulation, members of the Reserve Components are authorized to
receive the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon for successful
completion of AT or ADT for a period of not less than 10 consecutive duty
days on foreign soil.  The evidence in this case confirms the applicant
completed more than 10 consecutive days of ADT in Germany between 10 and 30
June 1990.  As a result, he is entitled to this award, and it would be
appropriate to add this award to his record and separation document at this
time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

___BPI__  __DWS__  __EEM__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is entitled
to the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon; and by providing
him a correction to his NGB Form 22 that reflects this change.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Overseas Service Ribbon.




            ____Bernard P. Ingold____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050005520                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/12/06                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1993/08/31                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |NGR 635-100                             |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Maximum Age                             |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT PARTIAL                           |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.  46   |107.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001123

    Original file (20080001123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his entitlement to the Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA), Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-KU), Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with silver hourglass (2nd Award) and "M" (Mobilization) Device; Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal (ARCAM) 5th Oak Leaf Cluster (6th Award), and Army Reserve Component Overseas Training Ribbon (ARCOTR) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007036

    Original file (20100007036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he needs the copies of orders from SOCEUR so he can update his active duty records to reflect the training he completed. One period is from 10 March 1987, the date he was released from active duty, and 3 September 1993, the date he was discharged from the Selected Reserve. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to justify awarding the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009321

    Original file (20100009321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service record does not indicate he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty after 11 June 1991. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for issuance of a DD Form 214 to show the following actions which occurred after the period covered his DD Form 214, dated 11 June 1991: * promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 29 June 1992 * 2 years of time in grade which he served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016804

    Original file (20140016804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or his military service records to show he: a. held military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 75C (Personnel Management Specialist) while serving in Active Reserve units; b. was awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090828C070212

    Original file (2003090828C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served with the Florida Army National Guard for 6 years and completed his enlistment and did not receive a Good Conduct Medal; that the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal was not put on his separation document; and that he served overseas in Norway from 15 February through 16 March 2003 and the Overseas Service Ribbon was not given him on his release from this short period of active duty. The applicant was a member of the Florida Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001050C070208

    Original file (20040001050C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. There is no DD Form 214 in the record for this period of active service. The applicant's records do not support his request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the OSR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009717

    Original file (20100009717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) and the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows, in Item 12f (Foreign Service), that the applicant completed 3 months and 15 days of overseas service. However, based on the applicant's active duty service subsequent to 1 August 1981, he is entitled to the OSR for his overseas tour completion in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021501

    Original file (20090021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (2nd Award), and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “Hourglass” and “M” device. With respect to award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant’s immediate commander awarded him the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal for service from 10 December 1986 through 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004806C070206

    Original file (20050004806C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with "M" Device and Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (ARCOTR). The applicant states, in effect, that pursuant to Presidential Executive Order 12743, dated 18 January 1991, he was ordered to active duty and mobilized in support of Operation Desert Storm. The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Army and entered active duty on 18 November 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002114

    Original file (20080002114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002114 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It is awarded to members of the Reserve Components of the Army, (Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve), for successful completion of annual training (AT) or active duty for training (ADT) for a period not less than 10 consecutive duty days on foreign soil. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...