Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004284C070206
Original file (20050004284C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        22 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050004284


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Fowler             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Eric N. Andersen              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Joe R. Schroeder              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier appeal for the
Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is submitting four eyewitness
statements that state his injuries were sustained under enemy fire while in
combat.

3.  The applicant provides four eyewitness statements from former fellow
Soldiers.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were
summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number
AR2004105347, on
9 December 2004.

2.  The applicant submitted four eyewitness statements from former fellow
Soldiers.  These statements are new evidence, which will be considered.
The statements show that the applicant helped a fellow Soldier whose
clothes were on fire by rolling him on the ground and assisting in putting
a fire out in a bunker which resulted in the applicant receiving burns to
his hand.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces
of the United States) covers his service in Korea.  Item 27 (Decorations,
Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaigns Ribbons or
Authorized) does not show award of the Purple Heart.  Item 29 (Wounds
Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) contains the entry
"NONE."

4.  The applicant's records contain information from the Hospital Admission
Cards created by the Office of The Surgeon General of the Army.  This
record showed the applicant was hospitalized for a non-combat burn received
to the hand on 21 May 1952.  The admission card further showed that the
causative agent to the burn was "Accidents in connection with use of own
instrumentalities of war:  Explosion of other ammunition."

5.  There is no evidence in the applicant's service records that shows he
was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Korea.



6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the
wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.  When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key
issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which
the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was
participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary
prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.  This regulation
also provides that there is no statute of limitations on requests for award
of the Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that
show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There is no evidence in the
available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows
his injury was a result of hostile action.  The eyewitness statements
submitted by former fellow Soldier's confirm that the applicant gave aid to
a Soldier whose clothes caught fire and assisted in extinguishing a fire to
an ammo bunker.  However, the applicant's Hospital Admission Card clearly
shows his hand injury was not a result of hostile action.

2.  The applicant's commander at the time of the incident must have been
aware of the ammo bunker incident as well the severity of the applicant's
injury and medical treatment.  Apparently the commander did not find it
appropriate at that time to recommend the applicant for award of the Purple
Heart.

3.  In the absence of military records which show the applicant was injured
as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis for award of
the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__TAP_ _  _ ENA __  _  _ JRS _  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of
the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR2004105347, on 9 December 2004.




                                  ____ Mr. Thomas A. Pagan ___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050004284                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |22 November 2005                        |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007127

    Original file (20140007127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's available military service records that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant's records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065453C070421

    Original file (2001065453C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. The Board also concluded that had the battalion surgeon determined the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, then he could have submitted the appropriate casualty report on 1 June 1952 which would have resulted in award of the Purple Heart. His argument 49 years after the fact that, it is “reasonable” to assume the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006834

    Original file (20120006834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, he received a copy of his military record and noted the following wounds were not annotated: * 16 February 1944, Anzio, Italy, head wound * 2 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, back wound * 8 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, finger wound * 28 December 1944, Colmar, France, hand wound * 9 January 1945, Orbey, France, leg wounds * 4 April 1945, Eichenbach, Germany, chest wound 3. The applicant provides: * Letter, dated 12 October 2010 * Excerpt from a newspaper, dated May 2011 * Self-authored...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002389

    Original file (20090002389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows his injury was a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083810C070212

    Original file (2003083810C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Purple Heart as authorized awards. The available records do not show that the applicant served in an infantry MOS or that he met the qualifications for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge during World War II.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000485

    Original file (20130000485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. An artillery round jungle pack exploded. The letters of support and other evidence provided by the applicant has been reviewed; however, there was no investigation conducted at the time of the incident to show the explosion was the direct result of enemy action (a booby-trapped artillery round).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073944C070403

    Original file (2002073944C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019343

    Original file (20140019343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. (3) Thus, these three statements (that do not show any evidence of being eyewitness statements) provide insufficient evidence to support a claim to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403

    Original file (2002073599C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...