| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. W. E. Schnupp | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries suffered during World War II.
APPLICANT STATES: Through his elected representative, that his case should be reconsidered based upon a letter provided by a retired colonel who was present at the time of the incident.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR2000047383) on 30 January 2001.
The letter provided by the applicant is considered new evidence that requires Board consideration.
The letter is from a now retired colonel who was an Army captain at the time of the incident in which the applicant was burned while destroying excess ammunition propellant found in an enemy gun position. The colonel states that during the course of the cleanup a fire erupted injuring several soldiers. He goes on to say that the soldiers who were hurt were highly trained artillerymen and their injuries, he believes, were not the result of carelessness. The applicant is not mentioned by name as one of the injured soldiers.
The applicant’s medical treatment card shows that he was treated for 1st and 2nd degree burns to the buttocks, back, neck, elbows and hands, bilaterally on 31 July 1943. The physician’s statement of the circumstances of the injury indicates that the applicant was injured “when soldier was helping to burn gun powder when they dumped a cart of powder on a spark and which set fire to powder before soldier could get away causing burns…”
Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The supporting letter submitted in behalf of the applicant’s request for reconsideration is insufficient as a basis to award the Purple Heart in that the individual making the statement was not an eyewitness to the event nor does he identify the applicant specifically as being involved in the mishap.
2. Furthermore, the circumstances of the applicant’s burns as described by the treating physician (the only such documentary evidence found in the record) indicate that the incident was more likely the result of an accident than combat action. Accidental injuries, even though they may occur in a combat zone, that are not directly attributable to an act of the enemy, are not considered wounds received in action and do not entitle the individual to the Purple Heart.
3. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___mvt___ ___le___ ___rjw___ DENY APPLICATION
Carl W. S. Chun
| CASE ID | AR2002073944 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020808 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 107.00 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000485
The applicant states: a. An artillery round jungle pack exploded. The letters of support and other evidence provided by the applicant has been reviewed; however, there was no investigation conducted at the time of the incident to show the explosion was the direct result of enemy action (a booby-trapped artillery round).
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02470
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02470 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. They indicated that to be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), a member must provide documentation to support that wounds were a direct result of enemy action and that the wounds required or received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015548
There is nothing in four typical documents showing he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster * A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007779
A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) completed at the time of his release from active duty do not show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the RVN Gallantry Cross orders indicate he was wounded, his service record is void of evidence that he was wounded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009238
DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 27 June 1970, shows that the aircraft in which the applicant was flying made a long approach to the airfield. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. He submitted a letter from the physician who attended his injuries as a result of the airplane...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former Army Air Corps member who served on active duty from 28 September 1940 through 15 September 1945. The Purple Heart Review Board considered applicant’s request for award of the PH and found no evidence that he had been injured as a direct result of enemy action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019343
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. (3) Thus, these three statements (that do not show any evidence of being eyewitness statements) provide insufficient evidence to support a claim to the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016783
His DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in action, and his service record is void of orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that show the hospital commander awarded him the Purple Heart. With respect to the applicant's argument that other Soldiers received the Purple Heart as a result of friendly accidents, the ABCMR decides cases on the evidence of record and each case is considered on its own merits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001436
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110006613 on 11 October 2011. The two WD AGO Forms 234 and VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant are new evidence which require that the Board reconsider his request. As such, in the absence of corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004284C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the applicant's service records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Korea. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.