Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004187C070206
Original file (20050004187C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        8 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050004187


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Diane Armstrong               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Delia Trimble                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his discharge date be changed from 29 May
1986 to 29 August 1986.

2.  The applicant states that the reason for the discrepancy is over 30
years old.

3.  The applicant provides a supplemental letter dated 15 January 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 29 May 1986.  The application submitted in this case is dated
22 March 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 12 April 1966.  He
completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was
awarded military occupational specialty 94B (Food Service Specialist).  He
was discharged on 11 June 1968 for immediate enlistment in the Regular
Army.

4.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 June 1968 and
continued to serve on active duty through a series of reenlistments.

5.  He was promoted to sergeant first class on 1 July 1982.

6.  A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) evaluated the applicant on 20
September 1985 and he was diagnosed as having chronic active hepatitis,
osteonecrosis left hip, and low back pain with radiculitis.  He was
referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  The MEB Proceedings
indicated that the applicant did not desire to continue on active duty
under Army Regulation 635-40.

7.  On 21 March 1986, an informal PEB found the applicant's medical
conditions prevented satisfactory performance of duty as a Food Service
Specialist in the grade of E-7.  The PEB recommended permanent retirement
with a 90 percent disability rating.
8.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders D81-
8 dated 1 May 1986 released the applicant from assignment and duty because
of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay with an
effective date of retirement of 29 May 1986.

9.  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) on the applicant's DD Form 214
shows he was released from active duty on 29 May 1986.

10.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) on the applicant's DA Form 2-1
(Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows he was retired on 29 May
1986.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation
of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the
Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a
brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from
active duty, retirement or discharge.  In the version in effect at the
time, it directed that the date separation was accomplished would be
entered in item 12(b) of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A 21 March 1986 PEB found the applicant unfit for military service at a
90 percent disability rating.  His MEB Proceedings indicated he did not
desire to continue on active duty.  As a result, the applicant was released
from active duty on 29 May 1986 and placed on the retired list.

2.  Orders and the applicant's Personnel Qualification Record show he was
released from active duty on 29 May 1986.  His DD Form 214 was prepared to
properly reflect the effective date of his separation as 29 May 1986.
Therefore, there is no basis for amending his DD Form 214 to show he was
released from active duty on 29 August 1986.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 29 May 1986; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 28 May 1989.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

SK______  DA______  DT______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  Stanley Kelley__________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050004187                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051108                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0200                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006370

    Original file (20080006370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 will be prepared for active Army soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration term of service (ETS)), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the UCMJ); Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training (ADT); Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD), active duty for special work (ADSW), temporary tours of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007021

    Original file (20120007021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his: * records to show he was retired in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * retirement certificate to show his rank as SP4 2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of SP4 on 1 September 1984. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * correcting his records to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013149

    Original file (20070013149.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 13 of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart and the applicant's records do not contain an order awarding the applicant the Purple Heart. This period of active military service is correctly shown in Item 12d of the DD Form 214, dated 28 August 2006. Evidence of record further shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (entered active duty) on 5 April 1989 and was discharged (temporary disability retirement) on 28 August 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012481

    Original file (20110012481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was not awarded and/or granted her a monetary disability benefit at the time of her separation for her disabilities incurred while on active duty and permanently aggravated by the service. However, her records contain a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows she was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-3 on 23 September 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 7-17B(1),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007072

    Original file (20090007072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The formal PEB concurred with the findings and recommendation of the informal PEB and directed the applicant be removed from the TDRL and separated with a disability rating of 20 percent for Addison’s disease. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30 percent. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015617

    Original file (20140015617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – lieutenant colonel (LTC) instead of major (MAJ) * item 4b (Pay Grade) – O-5 instead of O-4 * item 12b (Separation Date this Period) – 18 March 1996 instead of 17 April 1991 * item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 29 June 1995 instead of 29 June 1989 * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000935

    Original file (20150000935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, a medical evaluation board (MEB) be held to determine if his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) should be corrected to show in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) that he was discharged from active duty on 7 May 1987 by reason of physical disability with severance pay or by reason of a medical retirement. His narrative reason...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008734

    Original file (20120008734.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he received a medical retirement, nor does it support his request for correction of item 9 of his final DD Form 214 to show he retired with more than 20 years of service. The applicant states the PEB failed to consider the physical profiles he received during his service; however, having had a temporary or permanent physical profile is not evidence of an unfitting condition. The record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011519C070208

    Original file (20040011519C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the applicant unfit and recommended a combined rating of 40 percent and that he be permanently retired from the service. Title 10, US Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of an unfit member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30 percent. The evidence shows that the applicant appeared before an MEB and PEB and was found unfit for duty and was permanently retired by reason of his physical disabilities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026151

    Original file (20100026151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 24 May 1995, he enlisted in the Regular Army as a food service specialist for a period of 3 years and assignment to Europe. The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that the evaluation and the rating rendered by the PEB was incorrect or that he should have received a higher disability rating...