IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 March 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090014361
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in the Republic of Vietnam.
2. The applicant states he was not issued his Purple Heart and it does not appear on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 21 July 1970.
3. The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 and two pages of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) monthly entitlement amount letter, dated 30 July 2009.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military personnel records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 July 1968. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3. The applicant was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 9 January 1969 to
5 January 1970.
4. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not contain any entries indicating that the applicant received any wounds.
5. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show the award of the Purple Heart.
6. On 21 July 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty by reason of the expiration of his term of service. He had completed 2 years of total active service during this period. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicants DD Form 214 does not show the award of the Purple Heart.
7. There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart.
8. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.
9. The applicant's service medical records were not available for review.
10. The applicant's VA monthly entitlement amount letter states the VA determined that a scar, residual of shell fragment wound to the calf of the left leg, was related to his military service and awarded him a 10 percent disability rating. The letter does not address whether or not the injury was a result of hostile action.
11. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart for the applicant.
12. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. armed services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
13. Title 38, U.S. Code, provides for the VA to make a determination and award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA does not make any determination as to whether an injury was received as a result of hostile action.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file showing he was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action.
2. The VA rating decision, submitted by the applicant, determined that a scar, a residual of a shell fragment wound, on the calf of his left leg was incurred while in the military service. However, this decision does not determine nor is it intended to determine whether the applicant's wound was a result of hostile action.
3. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ __X____ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090014361
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090014361
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917
However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064741C070421
Counsel also noted that the DVA rating decision granted service connection for shrapnel wounds to his shoulder and that the wounds are consistent with his history of being wounded in Vietnam. The rating decision states that the applicant’s service medical records were reviewed when his claim was considered and denied in 1989. The Board noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal or any unit awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793
He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006819
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). His DD Form 214 lists the Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars, United Nations Service Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018346
The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020541
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available service medical records show he listed a shrapnel wound in December 1969 and the military medical doctor found evidence of a scar on his right forearm. In the absence of orders or other additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024144
The applicant provides a statement from his spouse and a VA rating decision as new evidence that will be considered by the Board. d. Reasonable doubt was resolved in favor of the applicant and it was determined he suffered shell fragment wounds to the left leg during combat in World War II that have resulted in the three tender scars of the left lower leg shown by objective findings during his latest VA examination. The available evidence shows the VA granted the applicant service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027226
For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 1 August 1969 in Vietnam *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010304
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Army Regulation 15-185 provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicants request for the correction of a military record. However, the ABCMR is not an investigative agency and the ABCMR must decide cases on the evidence of record or on the evidence provided by the applicant.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000591
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an ammunition dump explosion when he appears to have sustained his low back injury and later received treatment for this injury. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional official documentary evidence to corroborate the events...