Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003040C070206
Original file (20050003040C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         6 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050003040


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Yvonne Foskey                 |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Curtis Greenway               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Laverne V. Berry              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests in effect, payment of a college loan under the
terms of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP).

2.  The applicant states, in effect that his recruiter at the Indianapolis
Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) after looking over his
promissory notes informed him that all of his student loans qualified for
repayment under the LRP and that the Army would be paying them in full.  He
further states, that he later received two letters from the Army stating
that they would not pay for three of his student loans.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application:  Self-Authored Letter, undated;  2 Letters from U.S. Army
Human Resource Command, dated November 18, 2003 and December 2, 2003;
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4/1); Record of Military
Processing-Armed Forces of the United States (DD form 1966/1); Statement of
Understanding – Army Policy (USAREC Form 1150); Statement for Enlistment
United States Army Enlistment Program (DA Form 3286-59); Statement for
Enlistment United States Army Station/Unit/Command Area Enlistment Program
(DA Form 3286-64); Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 (DD Form 2366); and
2 DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Applications (DD Form 2475)
with attached loan applications from Sallie Mae and Citibank.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that on 15 May 2002, he enlisted
into the Army Reserve for a period of 8 years.

2.  On 22 November 2002, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 5
years. A Statement of Understanding (Army Policy) prepared during his
enlistment processing confirms the option and incentives he contracted for
during his enlistment processing.  The LRP, Option 9C, is one of the
incentives authorized.  The applicable LRP terms are listed in paragraph 4
of this form.

3.  The LRP provisions of Annex D, in the Statement of Understanding state,
in pertinent part, that the applicant understood he must disenroll from the
GI Bill at the time he entered active duty and if he failed to do this he
would not be eligible for the LRP.  It also indicated that the applicant
understood that the Government will repay a designated portion of any loan
he incurred that was made, insured, or guaranteed under Part B of the
Higher Education Act (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under Part E of
such act (National Direct Student Loan) after
1 October 1975 and before he enlisted in the Army

4.  Annex D further indicated that the applicant’s enlistment for the LRP
ensured him, provided he met and maintained the prescribed prerequisites,
that the portion or amount of his student loans that could be repaid was 33
1/3 percent or $1,500, whichever was greater of the unpaid principal
balance for each year of service completed, up to an amount of $65,000.00.
The applicant and service representative signed this document on the date
he entered active duty on 1 May 2003.  There is no indication in this Annex
that any question was raised in regard to the eligibility of his loans for
repayment.

5.  On 22 November 2002, the recruiting guidance counselor completed
Section V (Recertification) and Section VI (Remarks) of the Record of
Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States (DD Forms 1966/3
and 1966/4).  These documents contained an entry confirming the applicant’s
participation in the LRP, but there were no entries regarding the
eligibility/ineligibility of any of his student loans.

6.  On 18 November 2003, the Acting Chief, Education Incentives and
Counseling Branch, Human Resources Command (HRC) notified the applicant his
Sallie Mae Servicing Corporation (SMSC) student loans of $3,346.00 did not
qualify for repayment under the LRP.  He further stated that the loan was a
Signature Student Loan, which are not made, insured or guaranteed under
Title IV Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act.  The applicant was
advised to apply to this Board if he believed he was not properly counseled
or that an error or injustice had occurred.

7.  On 2 December 2003, the Acting Chief, Education Incentives and
Counseling Branch, Human Resources Command (HRC) notified the applicant
that his loans that were disbursed on November 13, 1998 and September 4,
1999, totaling $22,778.96 did not qualify for repayment under the LRP.  He
further stated that the loans were private loans, which are not made,
insured or guaranteed under Title IV Part B, D, or E of the Higher
Education Act.  The applicant was advised to apply to this Board if he
believed he was not properly counseled or that an error or injustice had
occurred

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment
Program) prescribes eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of
persons, with or without prior service (PS), into the Regular Army (RA) and
the USAR.  Chapter 6, section II, contains guidance on the Guidance
Counselor Processing Phase.  It states, in pertinent part, that Guidance
Counselors will use the supporting automated systems and updated regulatory
material applicable to MOS and available options to counsel all applicants
on their enlistment options.  It further states that Guidance Counselors
will counsel applicants who fail to meet specific qualifications for
options for which they applied and advise them of other available options

9. Table 9-4 of the enlistment regulation, in effect at the time of the
applicant’s enlistment, contained guidance on enlistment option program 9C
(Bonus/Army College Fund/Loan Repayment Program).  It contained specific
guidance pertaining to the LRP and indicated that the government would
repay a designated portion of any loan incurred that was made, insured, or
guaranteed under part B of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Guaranteed
Student Loan) or any loan under part E of such act (National Direct Student
Loan) after 1 October 1975 and before enlistment into the Regular Army.  It
further stipulated that Guidance Counselors were required to confirm they
accomplished all the processing procedures by making the appropriate
entries in the DD Form 1966.  This included a statement regarding the
applicant’s eligibility for the LRP, which included any factors that could
disqualify him from receiving the LRP benefit, and ensuring the applicant’s
acknowledgement of this fact was also recorded in the remarks section of
the DD Form 1966.

10.  The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 2171 (10 USC 2171), which
provides the legal authority for the education loan repayment program for
enlisted members on active duty in specified military specialties.  The law
states, in pertinent part, that loans that qualify for repayment are
Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student
Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students,
Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate
Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS), and
consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, or William D. Ford Loan.  It further specifies that
payment of such loans shall be made on the basis of each complete year of
service performed as an enlisted member in a military specialty specified
by the Army.  The Government will not make any payments to the Soldier or
reimburse a Soldier if he or she pays off a student loan.  The Government
will only pay the lending institution

11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the law which provides for the
Board, states that “The Secretary may pay, from applicable current
appropriations, a claim for the loss of pay, allowances, compensation,
emoluments, or other pecuniary benefits, or the repayment of a fine or
forfeiture, if, as a result of correcting a record under this section, the
amount is found to be due the claimant on account of his or another’s
service in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps or Coast Guard, as the
case may be”.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is clear the applicant’s student loan did not meet the criteria
established by law and regulation to qualify for repayment by the Army
under the LRP.  The loans were not made, insured, or guaranteed under Title
IV, Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as is required.
However, this is not the overriding factor in this case given the equity
considerations and the resultant injustice.

2.  The Statement of Understanding of the applicant’s enlistment contract
established a contractual agreement between the applicant and the Army, and
the record clearly shows the responsible recruiting officials failed to
make reference to any loans ineligible for payment under the LRP, as
evidenced by the absence of an entry in the remarks section of the DD Form
1966.

3.  In addition, the governing regulation requires Army Guidance Counselors
to verify and counsel applicants on their eligibility for the options they
agreed to prior to their departing for active duty.  Further, these
counselors are obligated to advise applicants on any options they agreed
to, but are not eligible for, and on any available alternatives.  Finally,
the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s enlistment required
counselors to add entries to the enlistment contract and/or associated
documents confirming this verification of option and incentive eligibility,
and/or counseling on ineligibility, prior to a member departing for active
duty.  In this case, counselors failed to properly document the
ineligibility of the applicant's loans on the DD Forms 1966/3 and 1966/4,
prepared on the day he departed for active duty.

4.  In view of the facts of this case, it appears the applicant entered
into an erroneous contract with the Army, based on the failure of
recruiting personnel to follow established regulatory guidelines in
connection with this enlistment processing, through no fault of his own.
Given the failure on the part of government officials to follow their own
regulations during the applicant's enlistment processing, it is appropriate
to rectify the resultant injustice at this time.

5.  In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to
show his Statement of Enlistment was amended to include the sentence, “If a
student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as
payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student
loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965
and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the LRP or the
repayment or default of the loan, the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records may pay the loan, at its sole discretion, in accordance with Title
10, U.S. Code, section 1552".  This would allow the Board to invoke that
provision and pay him the $3,346.00 due for the Sallie Mae Servicing
Corporation Loans and the $22,778.96 for the Citibank loan.

BOARD VOTE:

___CG __  __RTD  _  __LVB___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
amending the applicant's Statement of Enlistment to include the sentence,
“If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for
enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that
the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education
Act of 1965, and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the LRP
or the repayment or default of the loan, the Army Board for Correction of
Military Records may pay the loan, at its sole discretion, in accordance
with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552".

2.  Further, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) shall remit
payment in the amount of $26,124.96 to the applicant as a result of this
correction, at the appropriate rate and manner.




                                  ____Curtis Greenway_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003040                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/10/06                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |ACTIVE DUTY                             |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.1026   |112.1200.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011753C070206

    Original file (20050011753C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program shows that he enlisted for the LRP up to a maximum repayment of $65,000 in addition to other incentives. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007573C070206

    Original file (20050007573C070206.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Title 10 of the United States Code, section 2171 (10 USC 2171), which provides the legal authority for the education loan repayment program for enlisted members on active duty in specified military specialties. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement of Enlistment was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003058C070206

    Original file (20050003058C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Title 10 of the United States Code, section 2171 (10 USC 2171), which provides the legal authority for the education loan repayment program for enlisted members on active duty in specified military specialties. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement of Enlistment was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009195C070206

    Original file (20050009195C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, payment of his student loan under the terms of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP). In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000365C070206

    Original file (20050000365C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Title 10 of the United States Code, section 2171, which provides the legal authority for the education loan repayment program for enlisted members on active duty in specified military specialties. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct the Statement of Enlistment to show it was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000311C070208

    Original file (20040000311C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the LRP or the repayment or default of the loan, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065475C070421

    Original file (2001065475C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010270C070208

    Original file (20040010270C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The LRP is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Title 10 of the United States Code, section 2171 (10 USC 2171), which provides the legal authority for the education loan repayment program for enlisted members on active duty in specified military specialties. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement of Enlistment was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003996C070206

    Original file (20050003996C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army repay a student loan under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP). The applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program, was amended to include the sentence, "If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011568C070206

    Original file (20050011568C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that he had any loans that do qualify for repayment under the LRP. The applicant’s military records should be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the LRP...