RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 November 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001830
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Linda D. Simmons | |Member |
| |Mr. Michael J. Flynn | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to
show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
2. The applicant states he would like his full allotment (i.e., retired
pay) without SBP as he originally requested. He was provided no help or
guidance in filling out the DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired
Personnel). The DD Form 2656 was filled out properly with the proper boxes
marked to receive his full retired pay. The instructions on the form
should give locations that provide assistance with filling out the form.
3. The applicant provides the first two pages of his DD Form 2656.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was born on 14 November 1944. After having had prior
service, he was appointed a first lieutenant in the Army National Guard in
1971. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-
year letter) is dated 21 June 1988. He apparently did not enroll in the
Reserve Component SBP at that time. He was separated from the Army
National Guard and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve in October 1988.
He was promoted to lieutenant colonel effective 5 October 1988. He was
assigned to the Retired Reserve effective 14 September 1993.
2. On 30 November 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656. The
instructions immediately beneath the title to the form state "(Please read
Instructions and Privacy Act Statement before completing form)."
3. In item 26g of Section IX (SURVIVOR BENEFIT PLAN (SBP) ELECTION (See
your Survivor Benefit Plan counselor before making an election)), the
applicant indicated he elected not to participate in the SBP. In item 27a,
he indicated he elected coverage to be based on full gross pay.
4. On the copy of the DD Form 2656 provided by the applicant, his spouse
and a witness signed (their original signatures are on the form) in items
30a and 31b of Section XI (SBP SPOUSE CONCURRENCE (Required when member is
married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse
coverage, or declines coverage. The spouse MUST NOT SIGN this statement
before the member makes the SBP election and signs the form)). The witness
is not the same witness who signed in item 33b of Section XII
(CERTIFICATION).
5. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) faxed a copy of the
applicant's DD Form 2656 to the Board analyst on 12 September 2005. That
DD Form 2656 was identical to the one provided by the applicant except his
spouse and a witness had not signed in Section XI.
6. The DD Form 2656 is a 4-part document, pages 3 and 4 consisting of
general instructions for the completion of the form. The general
instructions state the member's personnel office, disbursing/finance
office, and SBP Counselor will assist him or her in the proper completion
and submission of the form. The instructions for the completion of Section
IX indicate items 26 through 28 fall under Section IX. The instructions
for item 26g inform the member to mark if he or she does not desire
coverage under the SBP ("If married and declining coverage, items 30 and 31
of Section XI must be completed"). The instructions for item 27a inform
the member to mark if he or she desires the coverage (emphasis added) to be
based on his or her full gross retired pay without Supplemental SBP.
7. The instructions for Section XI of the DD Form 2656 inform the member,
in part, that an otherwise eligible spouse must concur if the member
declines to elect SBP coverage. The instructions also inform the member
that, if concurrence is not obtained when required, maximum coverage will
be established for the spouse.
8. The U. S. Army Human Resources Command – St. Louis (USAHRC – STL)
provides a general instruction sheet to members with their retired pay
application packet. The general instruction sheet states, in part,
"Questions pertaining to the completion of the enclosed forms may be
directed to the Customer Contact Office of this Command by dialing 1-800-
___-____."
9. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The
SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay
reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
10. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986,
required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election
that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.
11. Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to
terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on
the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to
withdraw from the SBP. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums
will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. The effective date of
termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the
month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The instructions on the DD Form 2656 itself (i.e., pages 1 and 2 of the
form) clearly indicated that Section IX pertained to the SBP. The
instructions on the two instruction pages of the DD Form 2656 (i.e., pages
3 and 4 of the form) provided more detailed instructions on completing the
form and Section IX.
2. The applicant's checking of both item 26g (that he elected not to
participate in the SBP) and item 27a (that he elected coverage based on
full gross pay) was contradictory. However, the instructions on the DD
Form 2656 itself clearly indicated that the applicant's spouse must provide
her concurrence if he declined coverage. The instructions for Section XI
on the two instruction pages of the DD Form 2656 informed him that, if
concurrence was not obtained when required, maximum coverage would be
established for the spouse. The available evidence shows his spouse did
not sign in Section XI concurring with an election not to participate in
the SBP at the time the DD Form 2656 was originally prepared.
3. Furthermore, the general instruction sheet provided by USAHRC - STL
with the applicant's retired pay application packet would have provided him
a contact number if he had any questions pertaining to the completion of
the DD Form 2656.
4. The applicant became eligible to draw retired pay on 1 December 2004.
He will have a 1-year period beginning on 1 December 2006 in which to
terminate his SBP enrollment. He is encouraged to contact the nearest
Retirement Services Officer prior to making his decision for more
information. A copy of the Retirement Services Officer Directory
(available in Army Echoes) will be provided to him.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mkp___ __lds___ __mjf___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_Margaret K. Patterson
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050001830 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20051110 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Chun |
|ISSUES 1. |137.03 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001830C070206
On 30 November 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656. The instructions for Section XI of the DD Form 2656 inform the member, in part, that an otherwise eligible spouse must concur if the member declines to elect SBP coverage. The available evidence shows his spouse did not sign in Section XI concurring with an election not to participate in the SBP at the time the DD Form 2656 was originally prepared.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001467C070205
The spouse MUST NOT SIGN this statement before the member makes the SBP election and signs the form. By a letter, dated 11 August 2006, the Board analyst requested that the applicant clarify whether her spouse had concurred with her election not to participate in the SBP or with her election to participate in the SBP based on full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The applicant’s spouse submitted a written statement on 24 August 2006 concurring with the applicant’s election not to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008254
The applicant states that he and his spouse elected not to participate in the SBP; however, when they completed the DD Form 2656 (Date for Payment of Retired Personnel), she erroneously entered the date "20061214" instead of "20071214," resulting in a "default" spouse coverage based on the full amount. The applicants DD Form 2656, dated 14 December 2007, shows he elected Not to participate in the SBP" and placed an "x" in Item 26g (I Elect Not to Participate in the SBP). As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019169
The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she elected, with her spouse's concurrence, not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and reimbursement of SBP premiums deducted from her retired pay. Evidence of record shows that the applicant declined SBP coverage on 12 May 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant's spouse concurred with her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019620
The applicant requests correction of the date in item 32b of his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel). The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) claimed the DD Form 2656 was invalid because the date was written incorrectly, which resulted in an automatic election of spouse-only SBP coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting item 32b of his DD Form 2656 to show "20120628."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006454
The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Level of Coverage) of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), to show Coverage with a Reduced Base Amount of $635.00 instead of Coverage Based on the Threshold Amount in Effect on the Date of Retirement. 2. The applicant states that he and his spouse elected coverage with a reduced base amount of $635.00 in Item 27 of his DD Form 2656, which was the minimum threshold amount in effect at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066266C070421
The spouse’s concurrence must be obtained and dated on or after the date of the member’s election but before the retirement date. Retiring members and spouses were to be informed of the SBP options and effects. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the DD Form 2656 almost two months prior to his retirement date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002610
The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse-only coverage. The applicant states: * an invalid election was made * she was shocked when the FSM's retirement pay was stopped after his death * entries on the FSM's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) are unclear and a determination should not have been made * the mistake would have been caught had the FSM listed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011042
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011042 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The iPERMS record does not contain copies of his retirement orders, any SBP election forms, or any other documentation dated after the 20-year letter issue date. The DD Form 2656 provided by the applicant is dated 27 August 2007.