Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001774C070206
Original file (20050001774C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        1 NOVEMBER 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050001774


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Anderholm               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Thomas O’Shaughnessy          |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carol Kornhoff                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a 12 November 1976 sworn statement be
expunged from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states that he never spoke to a Major “M.”  He never made
such a statement.  The content in the statement is embarrassing to him, his
family, his country, and his God.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the above-mentioned statement, and a
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (JF) (Statement in Support
of Claim) in which he states that the contents of the interrogation are
totally false.  He received this (the statement) on 1 July 2005.  He states
that he had never seen or heard of the statement before this recent time
frame.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 30 November 1979.  The application submitted in this case
is dated 10 January 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Army for 3 years on 19 June 1974.  He was
trained as an electrician and assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia.

4.  The sworn statement that he provides shows that he and other Soldiers
were part of a work detail on 9 November 1976 on Grandstaff Range.  A
Soldier found a piece of metal on the ground and they were discussing
whether it was a dud or not.  After eating, he had the piece of metal and
threw it at one of the targets.  The metal missed the target and something
exploded.  One of the Soldiers stated that he was hit.  As he walked, he
saw some blood on his arm and knew that he must have been hit also.  He was
put in an ambulance and sent to the hospital.

5.  The statement shows that the applicant’s name was on the statement,
indicating that he made the statement.  The questions asked the applicant
were from a Major “M,” who witnessed the statement.  At the end of the
statement the applicant affixed his signature.  He initialed the first page
of the statement.  The affidavit shows that the statement was subscribed
and sworn to before a    Captain “L,” a Medical Service Corps officer at
Martin Army Hospital at Fort Benning on 12 November 1976, and that the
applicant signed it, attesting to its authenticity.

6.  A 28 April 1977 narrative summary for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)
shows that the examining physician, commenting on the applicant’s medical
history, stated that the applicant was injured on 9 November 1976, and the
applicant stated to him (the doctor) that “he was throwing a pork chop bone
to discard it when it inadvertently hit a ‘dud’ shell which he did not
realize was in the area.  This shell exploded and caused him multiple
fragment wounds (as I recall from reading the Line of Duty Determination
Report, the patient stated that he was throwing a bolt to discard them when
they inadvertently hit the shell fragment which he did not see because of
tall grass).”

7.  The applicant underwent MEB and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
proceedings, and on 30 September 1977 was placed on the temporary
disability retired list (TDRL) with a 60 percent disability rating.  He was
removed from the TDRL on 30 November 1979 and permanently retired on 1
December 1979 with a 70 percent disability rating.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant made a sworn statement, the
statement that he provides with his application, that he initialed the
first page of the statement, that he affixed his signature at the end of
the statement, and that the statement was subscribed and sworn to before by
an officer authorized by law to administer oaths.  He signed the statement,
and it was witnessed by the officer who questioned him.

2.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to cast
doubt on the authenticity of the statement.  He made the statement and
swore to it.  There is no error or injustice done to him.

3.  Accordingly, his request to have the statement expunged from his OMPF
is not granted.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1979; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
29 November 1982.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JA___  __TO ___  __CK ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ____ James Anderholm_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050001774                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051101                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |134.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001774C070206

    Original file (20050001774C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The statement shows that the applicant’s name was on the statement, indicating that he made the statement. The evidence shows that the applicant made a sworn statement, the statement that he provides with his application, that he initialed the first page of the statement, that he affixed his signature at the end of the statement, and that the statement was subscribed and sworn to before by an officer authorized by law to administer oaths.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018191

    Original file (20140018191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. PFC GPC noticed that PFC JPD had a mortar in his hands and told him that he should leave the mortar alone; however, PFC JPD ignored him. SFC WBA took the empty canister...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016215

    Original file (20100016215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. A statement, dated 22 January 2010, from a retired SFC and comrade who served with the applicant in Vietnam and has known him over the years. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061661C070421

    Original file (2001061661C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013271

    Original file (20090013271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1967. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010001

    Original file (20060010001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service) to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he sustained while serving in Dover, England, by enemy bombs from Calais across the channel, during World War II. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02089

    Original file (BC-2002-02089.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the PH based on wounds he received in 1944, when a booby trap exploded. There is no evidence in the applicant’s medical or personnel records which proves he was injured as a direct result of enemy action. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that his injuries were the direct result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022864

    Original file (20100022864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A self-authored statement, dated 21 October 2009, wherein he states he served as the platoon sergeant of the 1st Platoon, C Troop. d. An undated statement from another former member (tank gunner) of the applicant's platoon wherein he states on or around 20 August 1968, they were returning from a mine sweep mission to QTC when their tank hit a bomb that damaged the right front of the tank. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity and the sincerity of his former platoon members, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077670C070215

    Original file (2002077670C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II. However, this medical documentation prepared almost 33 years after the fact, is not sufficient by itself as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, in view of evidence of record which shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085691C070212

    Original file (2003085691C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, the applicant submitted a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge, with a date of separation of 4 December 1945, a self-authored letter adding detail to his application, three witness statements, a certificate awarding him the Bronze Star Medal dated 26 February 1987, a copy of a Certificate of Merit awarded him by the Commander of the 99th Infantry Division, and three other documents. In this statement,...